2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}
View Poll Results: Do you agree with this
Yes
41.76%
No
58.24%
Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll

Bad News for Retro Body Lovers (Cont. of the New Body Thread)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6/8/06 | 05:50 AM
  #21  
ford4v429's Avatar
legacy Tms Member
 
Joined: October 9, 2005
Posts: 2,599
Likes: 67
From: N.E. Ohio
I hope they make a 'call it what you want' version that looks like a modern 69. folks call the 05 retro, but park it beside an old one- it dwardfed the 69 for one thing(blew my mind first time I rolled my 69 out, parkedthe 06 next to it) and really its not at all like the older ones- yes the hood is longer than the trunk, its got a kinda fastback roofline, and the headlamps are angled back, and it dont have a pointy nose- but other than vague text references, there aint a similar line on the car.

I hope for the more 69/70 quarter top line, losing the hockey stick, and rolling the trunk into integral spoiler like 69/70. on the nose- as long as its got a big recessed grille, it will look more like a mustang- thats the one thing I hate about the new camaro- the pointy nose...the vette taillamps look wrong too.
Old 6/8/06 | 01:49 PM
  #22  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,609
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
I don' think the mustang will lose the side scallop ever again.. that seems to be one mustang only feature.
Old 7/2/06 | 09:21 PM
  #23  
MBStang's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: February 8, 2006
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
I was reading a magazine today and it said that the 2009 (Which they called a 2008 model) will be completely changed. The only thing that will stay the same is the roof centerline. Not really sure what they meant by that. I don't know if I am excited or afraid to see the new stang.

Old 7/2/06 | 10:07 PM
  #24  
Knight Rider's Avatar
Thread Starter
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: April 13, 2006
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
From: McAllen, Texas
lets just hope they don't mess it up
Old 7/2/06 | 11:23 PM
  #25  
SyNRG's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 22, 2005
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
From: Brea, CA
^^x2!
Old 7/2/06 | 11:33 PM
  #26  
BuzzyStang05's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: April 8, 2004
Posts: 765
Likes: 1
maybe ??? Only thing the same is the "roof centerline". Would seem to be a bit more stylized to compete with Challenger and Camaro.
Attached Thumbnails Bad News for Retro Body Lovers (Cont. of the New Body Thread)-mustcoupe_sketchredf3q.jpg   Bad News for Retro Body Lovers (Cont. of the New Body Thread)-mustcoupe_sktchredf3q2.jpg   Bad News for Retro Body Lovers (Cont. of the New Body Thread)-05sketch1102-9.jpg  
Old 7/3/06 | 11:35 AM
  #27  
KdF's Avatar
KdF
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 11, 2006
Posts: 428
Likes: 1
From: South Austin Texas
OOhh Louvers.

But THAT looks like a Camaro.
Old 7/13/06 | 01:53 PM
  #28  
Josh69's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: September 14, 2004
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
The front of that 05sketch reminds me of the fox body stangs. I doubt Ford will go back to that with the stang, it's had so much success with the hood overhang, which hasn't really been done in years. IMHO.
Old 7/15/06 | 12:08 AM
  #29  
monarchbball13's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: July 13, 2006
Posts: 19
Likes: 0
If there gunna have a Boss in 2009 it better look a little retro, and plus both the challenger and camro have a retro style, so they have to compete with that.
Old 7/15/06 | 12:40 AM
  #30  
jenks's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: June 6, 2006
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by KdF
OOhh Louvers.

But THAT looks like a Camaro.
I forget where(i think it was in motor trend maybe?) the Ford was talking about filing a lawsuit against GM because the new Camaro had some body lines too similar to the next Mustang.
Old 7/16/06 | 10:34 AM
  #31  
Knight Rider's Avatar
Thread Starter
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: April 13, 2006
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
From: McAllen, Texas
I wanted to post this in another thread, but thanks to jenks post, I ll post it right here.

Two days ago, I talked to a friend, who is a die hard bowtie lover, about the new Camaro. He told me that the Camaro concept was built in 1999 and that Ford copied their idea of a retro car.
Then he told me that the reason the Camaro is going back into production was not because of the success of the Mustang, but because the public wanted it to return.

Now tell me something; if this is true, why didn't the Camaro go into production in 2006 when they saw the 05 Mustang Concept, and why did they make that concept 3 years before the Camaro was put out of production.
Old 7/16/06 | 01:03 PM
  #32  
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
 
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,390
Likes: 2,293
From: Carnegie, PA
Because it's more than obvious, whoever your friend got his info from..Is full of This sounds nothing short of just another, typical GM publicity stunt, which doesn't make any logical sense, whatsoever...LMAO
Old 7/17/06 | 04:43 PM
  #33  
dekujala's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 11, 2005
Posts: 584
Likes: 0
I doubt it was built in 1999, actually if you have seen the video and article about the making of it, it says they were still creating the concept right up to the deadline of the unveiling. Although they could have had a different concept around for awhile, or just on paper.
Old 7/21/06 | 12:36 PM
  #34  
Farsyte's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: April 27, 2006
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
don't you remember the 2005 mustang concept...that was both retro and modern..the same crap they are saying about the new camero concept. I doubt ford will go away from the retro look..its selling and why would they wanna mess that up?
Old 7/22/06 | 07:59 PM
  #35  
Thunder Road's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: February 7, 2005
Posts: 615
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Knight
I don' think the mustang will lose the side scallop ever again.. that seems to be one mustang only feature.

I think the scallop is what makes the Boss type stripes look odd on the S197.
Scallops or no, dont change it a lot
Old 7/23/06 | 02:00 PM
  #36  
RaGsHoCkEy88's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: June 12, 2004
Posts: 3,071
Likes: 0
1st of all guys, the camaro and challenger will not look the way they do right now as concepts, lots will change before both hit the streets...dont forget that in the camaro design studio, a new mustang was used to take styling queues from
Old 7/24/06 | 07:42 AM
  #37  
jarradasay's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: February 17, 2004
Posts: 543
Likes: 1
From: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted by RaGsHoCkEy88
1st of all guys, the camaro and challenger will not look the way they do right now as concepts, lots will change before both hit the streets...dont forget that in the camaro design studio, a new mustang was used to take styling queues from
I agree about the camaro, but I'll wager that the challenger comes in pretty close to what we see now. Chrysler has a very strong reputation for building cars that mirror the concepts. Interiors, wheels are another story, but I bet the body is all but identical.
Old 7/27/06 | 12:07 AM
  #38  
AnotherMustangMan's Avatar
Cam Tease
 
Joined: September 30, 2004
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
I hope, and think, you'll be right for the most part, unfortunately the greenhouse is going to grow a couple inches =/.
Old 7/27/06 | 11:13 AM
  #39  
WindVeilS197's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 10, 2005
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Yea well its halarious to see the Challenger's interior. It looks almost like a carbon copy of the 05 Mustang. Check out the steering wheel, speaker placement on the doors, door inderts, center console, window switches...its horrible how similar they are.
Attached Thumbnails Bad News for Retro Body Lovers (Cont. of the New Body Thread)-04.jpg   Bad News for Retro Body Lovers (Cont. of the New Body Thread)-2005-mustang-7.jpg  
Old 7/27/06 | 12:06 PM
  #40  
AnotherMustangMan's Avatar
Cam Tease
 
Joined: September 30, 2004
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
Well, the three spoke steering wheel is typical for retro muscle, speaker placement on the doors is typical for....cars, as are the door inserts, and the center console is completely different. I see no abnormal level of similarity between the two.



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:22 AM.