S197 GT, then what's correct? You can't just say he's wrong & not back it up.

 

Look at the thread I started on s197forums.com chit chat section, title ghost cam legal issues. Let me know if anything is still unclear.

 

It is? Funny, that came right from Lund's forum posts.

 

Ok, so anyhow, does anyone on here have this tune? and does it run ok for you etc....?

 

If I were you I'd skip it. Just sayin...

 

Just get the cams changed in your car. You get the cool idle and performance.

 

 

Really? Where did he post that he had drivability issues?

 

Let me clarify; Lund simply posted that he was stopping due to Ford's request. He went on Lethal's forums and posted it. Article here:

http://www.mustangevolution.com/must...ost-cam-tunes/

There are numerous posts of people having issues with idle, and Lund even acknowledges that the tables he used to produce the tune were different than Ford used when developing the TracKey.

Now, as far as driveability issues, I have seen both the TracKey idle and the Lund idle in person, and spoke with owners running the Lund tune. The issue was that at low rpm's, the car would kick back into "lopey" mode, and they could never figure out why this was. AM's Chris Rose also hinted that the current tune that was offered by so many was a derivative of the Lund files, and would most likely have issues on the road:

http://www.mustangevolution.com/foru...08/#post902316



Bottom line, I wouldn't risk my motor for just a sound.

 

That's the sole reason why I wanted it, the sound it made. I will cross this off my list. Maybe in 6 yrs when car is paid off, they'll have kinks worked out? Thanks!!

 

What cams would you guys throw at it?

 

The tune on auto's drivability sucks. Lots of bucking at low rpm's. I found the power not to be as good as his aggressive tune. Ok for a couple of weeks or on the weekend but not a tune you want to drive all the time.