87 VS 91 gas
#1
87 VS 91 gas
Here is what i read elsewhere from FRPP about the octane being used in the 2011 GT.
One other thing, the 412hp is on 87 pump gas. FRPP is already stating there will be a kit out there with a 91 octane tune that can push hp close to 450hp. This is BMW M3 performance .
Hum, i wonder what kind of a kit they will be offering. I can just imagine filling up my 2011 with 94 octane at my local Petro-Canada.
One other thing, the 412hp is on 87 pump gas. FRPP is already stating there will be a kit out there with a 91 octane tune that can push hp close to 450hp. This is BMW M3 performance .
Hum, i wonder what kind of a kit they will be offering. I can just imagine filling up my 2011 with 94 octane at my local Petro-Canada.
Last edited by montreal ponies; 1/2/10 at 06:13 PM.
#2
One other thing, the 412hp is on 87 pump gas. FRPP is already stating there will be a kit out there with a 91 octane tune that can push hp close to 450hp. This is BMW M3 performance .
Hum, i wonder what kind of a kit they will be offering. I can just imagine filling up my 2011 with 94 octane at my local Petro-Canada.
Hum, i wonder what kind of a kit they will be offering. I can just imagine filling up my 2011 with 94 octane at my local Petro-Canada.
Keep telling self: soon I can order, soon I can order, soon I can order, soon I...
#4
Here is what i read elsewhere from FRPP about the octane being used in the 2011 GT.
One other thing, the 412hp is on 87 pump gas. FRPP is already stating there will be a kit out there with a 91 octane tune that can push hp close to 450hp. This is BMW M3 performance .
Hum, i wonder what kind of a kit they will be offering. I can just imagine filling up my 2011 with 94 octane at my local Petro-Canada.
One other thing, the 412hp is on 87 pump gas. FRPP is already stating there will be a kit out there with a 91 octane tune that can push hp close to 450hp. This is BMW M3 performance .
Hum, i wonder what kind of a kit they will be offering. I can just imagine filling up my 2011 with 94 octane at my local Petro-Canada.
Do you have a link to this because this is the first I have heard this.
#5
And like Bullitt's "Adaptive Spark Ignition", torque is reduced by 10 on 87. Bullitt info says nothing about HP diff.
Course the 5.0 has the TiVCT thrown in the mix too...
"Engine performance is further enhanced through the use of an innovative adaptive spark ignition system, new for the 2008 Mustang Bullitt.
The system can sense, within a few seconds, what type of fuel is being injected into the motor and adjusts the spark to provide maximum torque at any given speed – and as much as 10 pounds-feet more between 1,000 and 4,000 pm."
Last edited by cdynaco; 1/2/10 at 07:04 PM.
#7
#8
I believe I read somewhere on Ford's site that 91 is "reccommended" and thats probably what the 390 is based on. The car will probably run fine on 87, just might loose a little low end grunt.
#9
#10
I'm the one who posted that up on 6speedonline. What did you expect? If I had a dollar everytime I posted on a Mustang website my Porsche and have been told to get my "eurotrash" out of here I wouldn't be worrying making the note payment on my Speed Yellow beauty. BTW, there were quite a few of us on the "elitist" website that defended the Mustang and it was the track guys. They see Stangs on the track and follow Grand AM (Koni Challenge) and they know the deal.
Glad you were on the site...
As far as to the OP..it was the recent Car and Driver article that stated that the car will run on 87 octane but you will lose 10hp and 13lbs of torque. This is the only ariticle I saw this. I was under the impression from quite a few people that we would have 400+hp on 87 octane...I guess it was true. I mean you subtract 10hp from 412 and you got 402
Dave
Glad you were on the site...
As far as to the OP..it was the recent Car and Driver article that stated that the car will run on 87 octane but you will lose 10hp and 13lbs of torque. This is the only ariticle I saw this. I was under the impression from quite a few people that we would have 400+hp on 87 octane...I guess it was true. I mean you subtract 10hp from 412 and you got 402
Dave
Last edited by Dave07997S; 1/3/10 at 01:40 AM.
#15
#16
#17
#18
I'm the one who posted that up on 6speedonline. What did you expect? If I had a dollar everytime I posted on a Mustang website my Porsche and have been told to get my "eurotrash" out of here I wouldn't be worrying making the note payment on my Speed Yellow beauty. BTW, there were quite a few of us on the "elitist" website that defended the Mustang and it was the track guys. They see Stangs on the track and follow Grand AM (Koni Challenge) and they know the deal.
Glad you were on the site...
As far as to the OP..it was the recent Car and Driver article that stated that the car will run on 87 octane but you will lose 10hp and 13lbs of torque. This is the only ariticle I saw this. I was under the impression from quite a few people that we would have 400+hp on 87 octane...I guess it was true. I mean you subtract 10hp from 412 and you got 402
Dave
Glad you were on the site...
As far as to the OP..it was the recent Car and Driver article that stated that the car will run on 87 octane but you will lose 10hp and 13lbs of torque. This is the only ariticle I saw this. I was under the impression from quite a few people that we would have 400+hp on 87 octane...I guess it was true. I mean you subtract 10hp from 412 and you got 402
Dave
If I could afford a Porsche I would have one too. I certainly appreciate you and the others on that site who were standing up for the Stang. I know it goes both ways with some neanderthals on some Mustang sites too.
#19
I knew it was you Dave. I love all kinds of cars and have had the opportunity to drive a 911 way back in 1984 (I can't imagine how much better they are now). It just irks me when someone turns up their nose at the mere mention of the Mustang name and dismiss it as junk when they have no idea what the car is capable of.
If I could afford a Porsche I would have one too. I certainly appreciate you and the others on that site who were standing up for the Stang. I know it goes both ways with some neanderthals on some Mustang sites too.
If I could afford a Porsche I would have one too. I certainly appreciate you and the others on that site who were standing up for the Stang. I know it goes both ways with some neanderthals on some Mustang sites too.
I can't even tell you the ribbing I got back in 01-07 when I owned E46 M3s..the guys on Roadfly just tore me up. Anyway I'm not a fanbois anymore, I still have my favorites but I won't dismiss the obvious when it comes to talking about cars.
Dave
#20
Believe it or not I am a Mustang guy in my heart. I hit my mid 30's and something happened...I cared about the rest of the car..not just how fast it goes. Ford is finally building a car that I can enjoy to the full extent not just horsepower.
I can't even tell you the ribbing I got back in 01-07 when I owned E46 M3s..the guys on Roadfly just tore me up. Anyway I'm not a fanbois anymore, I still have my favorites but I won't dismiss the obvious when it comes to talking about cars.
Dave
I can't even tell you the ribbing I got back in 01-07 when I owned E46 M3s..the guys on Roadfly just tore me up. Anyway I'm not a fanbois anymore, I still have my favorites but I won't dismiss the obvious when it comes to talking about cars.
Dave