2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

5.0 confirmed for 2010

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5/20/08 | 05:26 PM
  #41  
max2000jp's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: September 2, 2004
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Boomer
The 5.0 sounds like its more based off of the old 4.6/5.4 mod family of motors with some sersious upgrades.
I would not doubt that the PJ Saleen 5.0 3v is a testbed of sorts, but you can bet if the PJ is making 400+hp in the 3v form, that doesn't have all the goodies that the Ford 5.0 4v has...that the ford 5.0 can trump it.
The PJ 5.0 is rated at 400hp advertised, but the dynos that I've seen show that number to be over-rated (roughly 20 hp at the crank). I am looking forward to see what Ford can do.
Old 5/20/08 | 06:13 PM
  #42  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Overated?
As in they show 380@crank?

Or underated
420@crank?
Old 5/20/08 | 06:24 PM
  #43  
jsaylor's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by 2k7gtcs
Boomer what's the deal? He was just asking a question in a thread he started you could have answered the question in less time than it took to type your response. I guess you own the 2010 forum now?
I think your just taking Boomer's response too seriously. I can't imagine he meant any offense and I think the language in his post which you likely interpreted as being a bit 'short'...specifically the 'thank you, carry on' comment.....was actually intended to be more light hearted than you assume. IMO the rest of the post was just a legit reference to the fact that the answer any questions the poster may have about the upcoming 5.0L V8 could be found in the sticky above, or at least what we know about it can be.

Last edited by jsaylor; 5/20/08 at 06:29 PM.
Old 5/20/08 | 06:26 PM
  #44  
max2000jp's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: September 2, 2004
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Boomer
Overated?
As in they show 380@crank?

Or underated
420@crank?
Over-rated, as in Saleen isn't honest with the numbers. They are making 380 at the crank.
Old 5/20/08 | 07:20 PM
  #45  
Topnotch's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 31, 2004
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 2
From: NYC
Originally Posted by 2k7gtcs
Boomer what's the deal? He was just asking a question in a thread he started you could have answered the question in less time than it took to type your response. I guess you own the 2010 forum now?
GUESS YOU DIDN'T READ TODAY'S PAPER!
Attached Thumbnails 5.0 confirmed for 2010-boomer.jpg  
Old 5/20/08 | 07:49 PM
  #46  
MustangFanatic's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: September 10, 2004
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte NC
Old 5/20/08 | 08:25 PM
  #47  
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
 
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,365
Likes: 2,257
From: Carnegie, PA
Originally Posted by 2k7gtcs
Boomer what's the deal? He was just asking a question in a thread he started you could have answered the question in less time than it took to type your response. I guess you own the 2010 forum now?
Just for the record: Boomer isn't the type of person who's known for being offensive towards anybody. For it seems to me, that you somehow just misunderstood his response to the poster's question, in which he was actually being humorous, when he posted the Thank you, carry on quote.
Old 5/21/08 | 06:57 AM
  #48  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Cool

Originally Posted by 2k7gtcs
Boomer what's the deal? He was just asking a question in a thread he started you could have answered the question in less time than it took to type your response. I guess you own the 2010 forum now?
I admin it, so yeah I guess

People may have questions, but rather than having multiple threads and multiple responses on the same question/issue, I just mearly pointed to the source of all information we have.

Just trying to keep the forum clean folks

I try not to tick people off, but I'm sure I'll rub someone the wrong way one time or another

Last edited by Boomer; 5/21/08 at 06:58 AM.
Old 5/21/08 | 07:18 AM
  #49  
2k7gtcs's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,752
Likes: 159
Just show me a next time and no harm no foul. MustangBoss429 is kind of new here and I didn't want him to get the wrong idea about the site. I love sarcasm, but it can be hard to discern in text. On a lighter note thanks for all you do Boomer for keeping us up to date on the 2010.



Gary
Old 5/21/08 | 08:46 AM
  #50  
lowblustang00's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: November 19, 2005
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 18
From: Central Alabama
Originally Posted by Topnotch
GUESS YOU DIDN'T READ TODAY'S PAPER!
Old 5/21/08 | 09:59 AM
  #51  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,609
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
Originally Posted by max2000jp
Over-rated, as in Saleen isn't honest with the numbers. They are making 380 at the crank.
I read the same thing. I heard saleen was trying to say it was 400hp using the old 15% drivetrain loss and saying 340rwhp would be 400hp. when in reality the current stang is around 12% loss giving the engine around 386hp.
Old 5/26/08 | 11:01 AM
  #52  
metroplex's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: October 2, 2006
Posts: 4,778
Likes: 16
From: Southeast Michigan
Originally Posted by max2000jp
The PJ 5.0 is rated at 400hp advertised, but the dynos that I've seen show that number to be over-rated (roughly 20 hp at the crank). I am looking forward to see what Ford can do.
That make more sense... I bet Ford will release the 5.0 with 350 hp (detuned).
Old 5/26/08 | 07:02 PM
  #53  
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
 
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,365
Likes: 2,257
From: Carnegie, PA
IMO that doesn't make any sense at all. In other words, if Ford is just going to add 50 more HP, then why even bother replacing the current 4.6L to begin with.

The 2010+ needs at least 400HP, in order to keep pace with the upcoming base Challenger R/T, and base Camaro V8.
Old 5/27/08 | 04:08 AM
  #54  
metroplex's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: October 2, 2006
Posts: 4,778
Likes: 16
From: Southeast Michigan
Originally Posted by m05fastbackGT
IMO that doesn't make any sense at all. In other words, if Ford is just going to add 50 more HP, then why even bother replacing the current 4.6L to begin with.

The 2010+ needs at least 400HP, in order to keep pace with the upcoming base Challenger R/T, and base Camaro V8.
The Challenger R/T will have 370 hp and the Camaro is supposed to get 400 hp. Since when has the Mustang GT competed on the same level? IIRC the Mustang GT was never faster than the F-body for the same model year.

It makes much more sense for Ford to include a 350 hp engine than to jump ahead and make a 400 hp engine.

98-98 GT: 215 hp
99-04 GT: 260 hp
05-09 GT: 300 hp
10-1x GT: 340-350 hp? vs 400 hp
Old 5/27/08 | 04:39 AM
  #55  
Black331's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 28, 2004
Posts: 266
Likes: 1
From: Long Beach, Ca
Originally Posted by metroplex
The Challenger R/T will have 370 hp and the Camaro is supposed to get 400 hp. Since when has the Mustang GT competed on the same level? IIRC the Mustang GT was never faster than the F-body for the same model year.

It makes much more sense for Ford to include a 350 hp engine than to jump ahead and make a 400 hp engine.

98-98 GT: 215 hp
99-04 GT: 260 hp
05-09 GT: 300 hp
10-1x GT: 340-350 hp? vs 400 hp

What doesn't make sense is failing to keep up with the competition again, just because something was done one way in the past doesn't mean it should be done that way in the future.

You can buy the V6.
Old 5/27/08 | 04:52 AM
  #56  
metroplex's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: October 2, 2006
Posts: 4,778
Likes: 16
From: Southeast Michigan
I am just saying that a 400 hp GT would be inconsistent with the Mustang branding. It was never intended to be the fastest pony/muscle car. It would also be harder for Ford to back up a 400 hp 5.0 3V/4V V8 with a 5 year / 60k powertrain warranty. A 350 hp V8 would be more conservatively tuned and is aligned with Ford's modus operandi.
Old 5/27/08 | 05:17 AM
  #57  
Indystang's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 16, 2004
Posts: 851
Likes: 0
From: Greenfield In.
If Ford waits till 2011 for the 302, 2010 won't go over big in sales. The magazines will have a field day with it. Car and Driver is already saying 6.2 400 HP in 2010. Those guys are setting the average reader up for a letdown if the 4.6 is still there. The Camaro and Challenger will be gobbling up lots of sales with their offerings by then. If the 4.6 "Is Dead" why put it in the "New" 2010 especially with the competition in full speed by then? I think it would be a big mistake to string along the 4.6 in 2010. Just my opinion. I want a 2010 and I want the 5.0
Old 5/27/08 | 05:26 AM
  #58  
GTJOHN's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: June 25, 2004
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by metroplex
The Challenger R/T will have 370 hp and the Camaro is supposed to get 400 hp. Since when has the Mustang GT competed on the same level? IIRC the Mustang GT was never faster than the F-body for the same model year.

It makes much more sense for Ford to include a 350 hp engine than to jump ahead and make a 400 hp engine.

98-98 GT: 215 hp
99-04 GT: 260 hp
05-09 GT: 300 hp
10-1x GT: 340-350 hp? vs 400 hp
The Challenger R/T automatic will have 370hp, while the manual will have 375hp. When looking at the options for the Camaro, its going to be in the 360hp-400hp range - most likely 400hp. The V6 Camaro is rumored to have a 300hp V6.

The Mustang is one of the few "hits" Ford has had recently. It would be a huge mistake for Ford to sit around with their hands in their pockets.
Its imperative that Ford keeps up or surpasses the competition. I've always been a Ford and Mustang guy, but I have to admit, I am a bit wary at this point.
Old 5/27/08 | 07:54 AM
  #59  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
I'm confident as long as they stick with the 'plan' we've heard..

Just too bad that plan doesn't come in 1 year earlier..
Old 5/27/08 | 08:42 AM
  #60  
GTJOHN's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: June 25, 2004
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Boomer
I'm confident as long as they stick with the 'plan' we've heard..

Just too bad that plan doesn't come in 1 year earlier..

A couple months ago, my source told me February 2010. I am foolishly hoping that things speed up, and we see it in fall 2009.


Quick Reply: 5.0 confirmed for 2010



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:22 AM.