Notices
2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By:

3.7L V6 - 48.5 mpg!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6/24/10, 10:57 AM
  #1  
Post *****
Thread Starter
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Thumbs up 3.7L V6 - 48.5 mpg!

press release
June 24, 2010, 9:10 a.m. EDT
Mustang V-6 Averages 48.5 mpg; Runs 1,457 Laps at Bristol on a Single Tank of Gas



BRISTOL, Tenn., June 24, 2010 /PRNewswire via COMTEX/ -- The 2011 Ford Mustang V-6 sets a new record by averaging 48.5 mpg on a track while completing 1,457 laps with an average speed of 43.9 mph
Mustang is powered by a new 3.7-liter V-6 engine that uses advanced engineering and technology to deliver great performance and fuel economy
More than 51,000 entries were received for the Mustang 1,000 Lap Challenge with 22 entries guessing the winning number of laps
A team of five drivers, including four Ford Mustang engineers and Ford NASCAR star David Ragan, drove the Mustang during its record run
The 2011 Ford Mustang, which made history when it became the first car ever to deliver more than 30 mpg and 305 horsepower, has set a new record by running 1,457 laps at Bristol Motor Speedway while averaging 48.5 mpg.
The Mustang 1,000 Lap Challenge was designed to demonstrate that a stock production Mustang V-6 could run 1,000 laps and 533 miles on a single of tank of fuel. With the aid of fuel efficient driving techniques by Ford engineers, the Mustang far surpassed its goal of 1,000 laps.

continued...
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/mus...gas-2010-06-24
Old 6/24/10, 10:59 AM
  #2  
Team Mustang Source
 
Karpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 28, 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I bet none of you lunatics will get that mileage, but you'll have a lot more fun!!
Old 6/24/10, 10:59 AM
  #3  
MOTM Committee Member
 
stangfoeva's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 17, 2006
Location: SoCal
Posts: 9,181
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Well I wan't even close. I guessed 1071 or 1171 lol
Old 6/24/10, 11:09 AM
  #4  
 
06GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 29, 2005
Posts: 4,618
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Wow. I guess that means I didn't win the contest
Old 6/24/10, 11:19 AM
  #5  
Bullitt Member
 
WarpdSpazm's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 26, 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
43.9 MPH average... **** that took a long time. Almost 18 hours.
Old 6/24/10, 11:51 AM
  #6  
Bullitt Member
 
jadedpony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lol I guessed like 13xx and thought I was insane!
Old 6/24/10, 11:53 AM
  #7  
Mach 1 Member
 
csledd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 23, 2010
Location: Paducah, KY
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
also with no A/C
Old 6/24/10, 11:58 AM
  #8  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
I can't believe 24 people guessed that number though. They must have been "in the know". I also assumed they would be doing 55-60mph. Oh well.
Old 6/24/10, 12:08 PM
  #9  
Mach 1 Member
 
csledd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 23, 2010
Location: Paducah, KY
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by laserred38
I can't believe 24 people guessed that number though. They must have been "in the know". I also assumed they would be doing 55-60mph. Oh well.
They did have 50,000 entries though
Old 6/24/10, 12:22 PM
  #10  
Bullitt Member
 
3.73-11's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 27, 2010
Posts: 283
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
**** I guessed 1237 laps lol I wasn't even close major props to those drivers though those are make a prius blush numbers
Old 6/24/10, 12:28 PM
  #11  
 
jacostang's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 27, 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 3,613
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
I guessed 1111 and people said I was nuts too! That is great though!!!
Old 6/24/10, 12:34 PM
  #12  
legacy Tms Member MEMORIAL Rest In Peace 10/06/2021
 
David Young's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 16, 2009
Location: Clinton Tennessee
Posts: 3,377
Received 125 Likes on 101 Posts
That must be the lowest speed (43.9 m.p.h.) for the 2.73 rear gears to go into 6th gear. My automatic with 3.31 rear gears doesn't go into 6th gear until 41 or 42 m.p.h.

This should help the sales of the V-6 Mustang.
Old 6/24/10, 01:09 PM
  #13  
Mach 1 Member
 
Gene K's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 24, 2007
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fuel efficient driving techniques could mean aggressive acceleration at low rpm followed by cutting the engine off and costing back down to minimum rpm and repeat. Thats normal procedure for fuel mileage competitions. An internal combustion engine is more efficient at heavier loads. That said I dont know if that would work on the steepest banks in NASCAR. At any rate they likely did things like accelerating down the banking (Using gravity) and allowing deceleration coming into the turns on the banking (That doesnt necessarily mean more or less throttle) . Much like using light throttle and allowing a car to loose some speed when climbing hills and letting it pick up speed on its own on down hills. I can guarantee they were not using the cruise control.
Old 6/24/10, 01:13 PM
  #14  
Cobra Member
 
Red Jay's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 9, 2009
Location: Tulsa OK
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
**** thats good! thats like the territory of a certain japanese hybrid, isnt it?
Old 6/24/10, 02:15 PM
  #15  
Bullitt Member
 
jadedpony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 19, 2004
Location: Buffalo
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Red Jay
**** thats good! thats like the territory of a certain japanese hybrid, isnt it?
Haha, good call!
Old 6/24/10, 02:21 PM
  #16  
V6 Member
 
MattN03's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 13, 2005
Location: Harrodsburg, KY
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's an impressive number but not likely to be reproduced in the real world, so what's the point?
Old 6/24/10, 02:42 PM
  #17  
V6 Member
 
SpOnkey21's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 18, 2009
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I guessed 1227 and my wife thought it was high. Would've been nice...
Old 6/24/10, 03:18 PM
  #18  
GT Member
 
iBookmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 24, 2010
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It might not be real world driving but, it does show that Ford as a 300+ HP V6 sports car that weighs 3600 lbs and if driven conservatively it can get well above 30 miles per gallon. It's a very nice car.
Old 6/24/10, 03:37 PM
  #19  
Mach 1 Member
 
Lancel's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 22, 2010
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well sure you aren't going to achieve that kind of number in reality, but the point of the matter is that it's a fuel efficient V6. I guessed just slightly over 1000 laps myself.
Old 6/24/10, 03:40 PM
  #20  
Legacy TMS Member
 
tom281's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 8, 2005
Location: Medina county, OH
Posts: 12,397
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
Crazy stuff!

Last edited by tom281; 6/24/10 at 03:41 PM.


Quick Reply: 3.7L V6 - 48.5 mpg!



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:30 AM.