2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

2011 V6 weight

Old Dec 7, 2009 | 05:37 PM
  #1  
GT40 2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: February 1, 2004
Posts: 940
Likes: 3
2011 V6 weight

How much does the new V6 mustang weigh? Is it more or less?
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 05:47 PM
  #2  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
No one knows. Lighter engine, probably heavier transmission. Will probably be close to a wash.
Reply
Old Dec 7, 2009 | 06:20 PM
  #3  
unnoticedtrails's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: April 27, 2004
Posts: 5,472
Likes: 65
From: Colorado
I heard the weight gains were going to be minimal.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 08:50 AM
  #4  
jsaylor's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 2,358
Likes: 1
What we know so far....

1:The V6 with the Performance Package will be under 3500lb.
2:The V6 with Performance Package will be at least a little heavier the a base V6 due to the larger wheels, sway-bars, brakes, etc.....so some V6 models will weigh in at considerably less than that.
3:A Mustang V6 will weigh at least 300lb less than a comparably equipped V6 Camaro.

Ford also commented in their press release that the 2011 Mustang has undergone a 'slimming down', which would be in line with what we have been hearing for months now, and we have long know that the 3.76L V6 weighs less than the old Cologne V6, so the car could actually weigh less than the old one. That said, the generic details above are all we really have right now.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 02:41 PM
  #5  
Ministang's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 11, 2006
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
A couple of the unknowns are how much more (if any) the new 6-spd transmission weighs than the current 5-speed, and which rear end will be used, if the 8.8 is used with the new V6, it is documented to weigh a fair bit more than the current 7.5.

The dual exhaust will also weigh more than the current single, and as mentioned, the suspension and larger wheels will also add weight.
Reply
Old Dec 8, 2009 | 05:52 PM
  #6  
thomasstang09's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: September 11, 2009
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
I would say that it will be the same-ish. The 3.7 will be lighter than the 4.0 but with the larger breaks, more exhaust etc they will probably balance out.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2009 | 08:41 PM
  #7  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Yeah... mass neutral, I can get onboard with that, hopefully it will be about the same with the GT.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 11:08 AM
  #8  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bob
Yeah... mass neutral, I can get onboard with that, hopefully it will be about the same with the GT.
The GT will have to be heavier. The 4.6L 3v is an all aluminum, light engine. Maybe the engines weight near the same, but add the bigger brakes, 6 speed etc, I don't see how it could get all that and not gain weight.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 11:15 AM
  #9  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
5.0 is all Al too. I'm thinking the 5.0 will be really close to the weight of the '10. If it is heavier it won't be by much. There are lots of ways to trim weight.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 12:14 PM
  #10  
SpOnkey21's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: October 18, 2009
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
the new 5.0 is rumored to have some new tech that allows for weight savings. I heard something about cylinder sleeves saving a total of like 40 pounds or something insane like that. In addition, the motor has a wider angle and lower deck because it doesn't have to fit in a stupid front wheel drive lincoln like the 4.6 did. The angle allows for tidier packaging. Not sure on all the specifics, but I would not be surprised if it weighed the same or even less despite larger displacement.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 12:42 PM
  #11  
FordBlueHeart's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 24, 2008
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
From: Traverse City
I recall hearing the 5.0 would weigh less as well. Internet fodder beware.
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 01:01 PM
  #12  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
It won't lose weight overall.
But it won't gain a boatload either...similarly optioned vs 2010
Reply
Old Dec 10, 2009 | 02:51 PM
  #13  
FordBlueHeart's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 24, 2008
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
From: Traverse City
Hey Boomer! What about the motor specifically?
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 12:26 AM
  #14  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Originally Posted by SpOnkey21
the new 5.0 is rumored to have some new tech that allows for weight savings. I heard something about cylinder sleeves saving a total of like 40 pounds or something insane like that. In addition, the motor has a wider angle and lower deck because it doesn't have to fit in a stupid front wheel drive lincoln like the 4.6 did. The angle allows for tidier packaging. Not sure on all the specifics, but I would not be surprised if it weighed the same or even less despite larger displacement.
I dont see where they would change the V from anything other than 90 degrees, you have balancing issues that crop up when you change that on a V8. I think the biggest area is probably the cylinderheads. The 2v heads were pretty big, the 3v heads fairly compact, and the 4v heads are just plain monsterous for the MOD motors. In comparison IIRC the Coyote is using a fairly compact 4v design (hopefully without to much compromise). Also juggling the bore and stroke as well as connecting rod and piston design can yield some results there to.

I suspect that the Coyote sans heads is probably wee bit wider and longer if the bores are bigger, but shorter in overall height. None of which is a really problem thanks to the need for fitting that monster of a 5.4 4V S/C mill in the S-197's engine bay.

While I'd like to see the GT stay pretty much in the 3500 lbs range, even if for some reason it comes in close to the V6 Camaro's curb weight, I'd still call it a win since the car will have more torque and horsepower than GM's V6.
Reply
Old Dec 11, 2009 | 07:17 AM
  #15  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Originally Posted by FordBlueHeart
Hey Boomer! What about the motor specifically?
Sorry don't know the weight of the motor itself.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 01:33 PM
  #16  
Mitchell Colvin's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: December 12, 2009
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Modesto, Ca
The guy who originally posted the "Decent video of 2011 v6" on youtube claims that he works for Ford. I asked him about the curb weight and if that was the new Race Red and he says, "Curb weights are still estimated as it hasn't been put through all the official testing and things can change before it goes on sale. That said, at this time, estimated base curb weight for the manual and automatic coupe is 3,750lbs. I think that is the new Race Red and it looks really good in person!". Not sure if he is telling the truth or if he's just yanking our chain. You can read his actual comment on youtube for yourself.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 04:27 PM
  #17  
Ministang's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 11, 2006
Posts: 911
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Mitchell Colvin
.........That said, at this time, estimated base curb weight for the manual and automatic coupe is 3,750lbs.......Not sure if he is telling the truth or if he's just yanking our chain.
Can't be true. Curb weight for the 2010 V6 with manual trans is right around 3400 lbs, no way Ford would add 350 lbs to the car, especially when they've said the V6 with the Performance Package will weigh less than 3500 lbs. The standard V6 with manual trans should come in around 3450 lbs or so, not 3750 lbs.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 08:45 PM
  #18  
Mitchell Colvin's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: December 12, 2009
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: Modesto, Ca
Originally Posted by Ministang
Can't be true. Curb weight for the 2010 V6 with manual trans is right around 3400 lbs, no way Ford would add 350 lbs to the car, especially when they've said the V6 with the Performance Package will weigh less than 3500 lbs. The standard V6 with manual trans should come in around 3450 lbs or so, not 3750 lbs.
That's what I was thinking. Just thought i'd share to you guys what this guy said. It would be scary if it was correct though considering that the GT may gain more pounds as well.
Reply
Old Dec 17, 2009 | 10:07 PM
  #19  
thomasstang09's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: September 11, 2009
Posts: 91
Likes: 0
This car will weigh 3750 with my big but in it! Can't wait to test drive one.
Reply
Old Dec 25, 2009 | 12:44 AM
  #20  
GT40 2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: February 1, 2004
Posts: 940
Likes: 3
On Wikipedia it says the 3.7L weighs 40 lbs less than the 4.0.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:16 PM.