2011 Mustang V6 spec sheet
Legacy TMS Member
Joined: January 25, 2010
Posts: 3,971
Likes: 1,663
From: Massachusetts
Another interesting tidbit.
The GT Brake package wheels are 19"x9" dark stainless painted wheels.
GT/CS and optional wheel 19x8.5" painted with machined face.
V6 Performance Pack - 19x9" painted wheels.
So which ones in the Order Guide are the V6 Perf. Pack, the 64V?
I'm curious about the fact that the V6 PPack uses the same 255 tires, but with narrower rims. Does anyone have an idea which brakes the V6 PPack will use?
The GT Brake package wheels are 19"x9" dark stainless painted wheels.
GT/CS and optional wheel 19x8.5" painted with machined face.
V6 Performance Pack - 19x9" painted wheels.
So which ones in the Order Guide are the V6 Perf. Pack, the 64V?
I'm curious about the fact that the V6 PPack uses the same 255 tires, but with narrower rims. Does anyone have an idea which brakes the V6 PPack will use?
I didn't think the V6 Performance Pack was in the ordering guide yet? at least it's not in the one I downloaded a while back, maybe it has been updated?
MOTM Committee Member
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Another interesting tidbit.
The GT Brake package wheels are 19"x9" dark stainless painted wheels.
GT/CS and optional wheel 19x8.5" painted with machined face.
V6 Performance Pack - 19x9" painted wheels.
So which ones in the Order Guide are the V6 Perf. Pack, the 64V?
I'm curious about the fact that the V6 PPack uses the same 255 tires, but with narrower rims. Does anyone have an idea which brakes the V6 PPack will use?
The GT Brake package wheels are 19"x9" dark stainless painted wheels.
GT/CS and optional wheel 19x8.5" painted with machined face.
V6 Performance Pack - 19x9" painted wheels.
So which ones in the Order Guide are the V6 Perf. Pack, the 64V?
I'm curious about the fact that the V6 PPack uses the same 255 tires, but with narrower rims. Does anyone have an idea which brakes the V6 PPack will use?
The V6 pp wheels look like black chrome GT/CS wheels to me. I like them more than the star treks and would probably trade someone....
FR500 Member
Joined: July 1, 2008
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 0
From: Oxford, UK
MOTM Committee Member
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
MOTM Committee Member
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
FR500 Member
Joined: July 1, 2008
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 0
From: Oxford, UK
If they don't clear out of the box, I bet they will with a 1/4" spacer.
Legacy TMS Member
Joined: September 20, 2004
Posts: 883
Likes: 4
From: N.E. Wisconsin
Still show 19/29 MPG for the MT ... thought this was a typo before in many news releases (including Ford's) and it really gets 19/30 MPG.
Also shows the V6 AT Conv loosing 1 MPG hwy vs. the coupe, but the MT coupe/conv. are the same.
Glad to see the MT is still 20 lbs. lighter that the AT ... MT's have been getting heavier due to the added gears & torque capacity plus add in the heavy dual-mass flywheels that they feel is neccessary and MT's are getting closer & closer to the AT weight.
Doug
Also shows the V6 AT Conv loosing 1 MPG hwy vs. the coupe, but the MT coupe/conv. are the same.
Glad to see the MT is still 20 lbs. lighter that the AT ... MT's have been getting heavier due to the added gears & torque capacity plus add in the heavy dual-mass flywheels that they feel is neccessary and MT's are getting closer & closer to the AT weight.
Doug
FR500 Member
Joined: July 1, 2008
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 0
From: Oxford, UK
Still show 19/29 MPG for the MT ... thought this was a typo before in many news releases (including Ford's) and it really gets 19/30 MPG.
Also shows the V6 AT Conv loosing 1 MPG hwy vs. the coupe, but the MT coupe/conv. are the same.
Glad to see the MT is still 20 lbs. lighter that the AT ... MT's have been getting heavier due to the added gears & torque capacity plus add in the heavy dual-mass flywheels that they feel is neccessary and MT's are getting closer & closer to the AT weight.
Doug
Also shows the V6 AT Conv loosing 1 MPG hwy vs. the coupe, but the MT coupe/conv. are the same.
Glad to see the MT is still 20 lbs. lighter that the AT ... MT's have been getting heavier due to the added gears & torque capacity plus add in the heavy dual-mass flywheels that they feel is neccessary and MT's are getting closer & closer to the AT weight.
Doug
Bullitt Member
Joined: February 4, 2010
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: UAE
Have you got an inside track with Ford or just know a bunch of people with their orders serialized or what? I'd like to browse over some if that's possible for an average shmoe like myself.
FR500 Member
Joined: July 1, 2008
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 0
From: Oxford, UK
Bullitt Member
Joined: February 4, 2010
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
From: UAE
Thread Starter
GTR Member
Joined: February 18, 2010
Posts: 4,990
Likes: 1
From: S.E. Texas
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MRGTX
2012-2013 BOSS 302
12
Aug 7, 2015 08:29 AM
MRGTX
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
5
Jul 21, 2015 02:08 PM