2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 vs. 1992 Ford Mustang GT 5.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5/10/10 | 03:17 PM
  #1  
Zastava_101's Avatar
Thread Starter
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,637
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 vs. 1992 Ford Mustang GT 5.0

http://www.insideline.com/2011-ford-mustang.html

Old 5/10/10 | 03:25 PM
  #2  
hawkeye18's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 20, 2010
Posts: 733
Likes: 1
From: Norfolk, VA
Mach 460, eh? lol
Old 5/10/10 | 03:41 PM
  #3  
Flagstang's Avatar
Spam Connoisseur
I got هَبوب‎ed
 
Joined: September 8, 2009
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 5
From: Sun City AZ
if both of these cars ran into each other doing 40 mph which would come out best? My moneys on the fox. No one cares about the drivers health so keep that in a volvo forum.
Old 5/10/10 | 03:42 PM
  #4  
todd03blown's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: November 30, 2009
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
From: South
I loved my 1991 LX 5.0 hatch back..what a great car it was with the flowmasters, pulleys, etc. Oh to be 19-21 again!! My license plate read "55 HAHA"
Old 5/10/10 | 04:21 PM
  #5  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,181
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
@ the GB 5.0
Old 5/10/10 | 04:23 PM
  #6  
Ltngdrvr's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: February 18, 2010
Posts: 4,990
Likes: 1
From: S.E. Texas
Originally Posted by Flagstang
if both of these cars ran into each other doing 40 mph which would come out best? My moneys on the fox. No one cares about the drivers health so keep that in a volvo forum.
By "ran into each other", do you mean crashed into each other???

From a 40 roll or standing start or whatever, a stock fox 5.0 would just be looking at the 2011's taillights as it walked it going down the road.
Old 5/10/10 | 04:42 PM
  #7  
assasinator's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 24, 2009
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Flagstang
if both of these cars ran into each other doing 40 mph which would come out best? My moneys on the fox. No one cares about the drivers health so keep that in a volvo forum.
you have to be kidding me right? the weak rattle trap fox chasis. compared to the s-197/jag s type/ lincoln LS chasis that is the 2005+ stang. u r kidding right?
Old 5/10/10 | 04:52 PM
  #8  
fdjizm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: June 6, 2008
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 2
Sorry I love my foxies but NO it's not going to beat the 2011 from a roll or any other type of race.
I don't know who told you that flagstang lol
Old 5/10/10 | 04:58 PM
  #9  
todd03blown's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: November 30, 2009
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
From: South
Originally Posted by assasinator
you have to be kidding me right? the weak rattle trap fox chasis. compared to the s-197/jag s type/ lincoln LS chasis that is the 2005+ stang. u r kidding right?
the same chassis that was used since 1979.....
Old 5/10/10 | 05:04 PM
  #10  
Blue Notch's Avatar
 
Joined: December 5, 2006
Posts: 31,620
Likes: 70
From: Trapped in Minnesota
LX looks way better than the GT (foxes).
Old 5/10/10 | 05:08 PM
  #11  
assasinator's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 24, 2009
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by todd03blown
the same chassis that was used since 1979.....
i know. sn-95(fox4) was an improved version. the s-197 has nothing to do with the fox or fox4.
Old 5/10/10 | 05:10 PM
  #12  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
jimmy square box
Old 5/10/10 | 05:13 PM
  #13  
todd03blown's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: November 30, 2009
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
From: South
Originally Posted by assasinator
i know. sn-95(fox4) was an improved version. the s-197 has nothing to do with the fox or fox4.
oh yea, I wasn't disagreeing with you..LOL
Old 5/10/10 | 05:25 PM
  #14  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by assasinator
compared to the s-197/jag s type/ lincoln LS chasis that is the 2005+ stang. u r kidding right?
That isn't what's in the S197.
Old 5/10/10 | 05:26 PM
  #15  
Flagstang's Avatar
Spam Connoisseur
I got هَبوب‎ed
 
Joined: September 8, 2009
Posts: 9,705
Likes: 5
From: Sun City AZ
Im talking head on wreck. pfft race what race
Old 5/10/10 | 05:28 PM
  #16  
todd03blown's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: November 30, 2009
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
From: South
Originally Posted by eci
That isn't what's in the S197.
Considered a new platform by Ford Motor Company, D2C is loosely based on the Ford DEW platform which served as the basis for the Lincoln LS, Ford Thunderbird, and Jaguar S-Type. The 2005 S197 Mustang was originally designed to use a "Lite" version of the DEW98 platform, but while that plan was eventually scrapped as too expensive, most D2C platform development completed prior to that decision was retained. This led to the carryover of several DEW98 chassis components. These components include the floor pans, portions of the transmission tunnel, the front frame rails, and basic fuel tank design.

Differences between D2C and DEW98 are most noticeable in the suspension: The DEW98-based Lincoln LS uses a 4-wheel independent double wishbone suspension. The D2C platform's MacPherson strut front suspension and solid axle rear suspension are less expensive to produce than DEW's more complicated setup. D2C also shares components with other Ford platforms. These include Ford's global C1 platform, with which D2C shares front strut and rear trailing arm components.

Last edited by todd03blown; 5/10/10 at 05:29 PM.
Old 5/10/10 | 05:35 PM
  #17  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Yep. Many people think it got the DEW98. It's as much a DEW98 as it is a Fox chassis.
Old 5/10/10 | 07:13 PM
  #18  
laserred38's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,047
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by stangfoeva
@ the GB 5.0

OH hush! .

Ahh I miss our 92 LX notch. It shoulda been mine .
Old 5/10/10 | 07:37 PM
  #19  
assasinator's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 24, 2009
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by eci
Yep. Many people think it got the DEW98. It's as much a DEW98 as it is a Fox chassis.
wrong again.

it has no components of a fox chasis. of course it has a different suspension from a LS/t-bird/s type, but most of the chasis is the same.

This led to the carryover of several DEW98 chassis components. These components include the floor pans, portions of the transmission tunnel, the front frame rails, and basic fuel tank design.


let see, that means the roofline, body, rear suspension mounting points, and a few other differences. that really doesnt make it very similar to a FOX.

my bad for not saying the suspension is different, and the mounting points are different. i assumed that when everyone already knows they are different i didnt need to. jeez.
Old 5/10/10 | 07:38 PM
  #20  
assasinator's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 24, 2009
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by todd03blown
oh yea, I wasn't disagreeing with you..LOL
im good man.


Quick Reply: 2011 Ford Mustang GT 5.0 vs. 1992 Ford Mustang GT 5.0



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:08 PM.