2010 Ford Vehicles Have Mykey feature
2010 Ford Vehicles Have Mykey feature
May be old news? But I saw this on the news last night, pretty cool feature. I imagine it will end up on the 2010 Mustang
http://jalopnik.com/5059406/ford-nan...d-radio-volume
http://jalopnik.com/5059406/ford-nan...d-radio-volume
It's simply the computer changing the limits or behaviors of some of the vehicles systems IF activated to a certain key.
If you never turn it on you'll never know it's there.
But think of the possibilities for a valet key. Keep the teenager from hot ******* in your 400HP muscle car.
In theory this is already possible with a tuner like one from Brenspeed. Though reflashing your car everytime the kid takes it wouldn't be very convenient, technically your car already has everything it needs for this MyKey system except the button to activate it.
Last edited by AWmustang; Oct 7, 2008 at 03:45 PM.
Yeah, I think the tuner works fine for people who really want to limit the car.. but.. this is not a good thing.
<Paranoid Fearmongering>
If one day, every car produced has this feature, it will not be long before the government will mandate that every car has this feature - and then it's very easy to see the government imposing restrictions on our own driving.
Got a speeding ticket? Your car gets detuned by the State and you cannot rev past 5k RPM or drive faster than 80mph for 60 months.
And then 10 years after that, it will be easy to just do away with the speeding punishment completely - why not just make speeding impossible to begin with? Then your max speed will be automatically determined by the speed limit on the road you're on, as determined by the GPS.
Hard to believe? Remember this post in 25 years. Ok. Done fearmongering.
</Fearmongering>
<Paranoid Fearmongering>
If one day, every car produced has this feature, it will not be long before the government will mandate that every car has this feature - and then it's very easy to see the government imposing restrictions on our own driving.
Got a speeding ticket? Your car gets detuned by the State and you cannot rev past 5k RPM or drive faster than 80mph for 60 months.
And then 10 years after that, it will be easy to just do away with the speeding punishment completely - why not just make speeding impossible to begin with? Then your max speed will be automatically determined by the speed limit on the road you're on, as determined by the GPS.
Hard to believe? Remember this post in 25 years. Ok. Done fearmongering.

</Fearmongering>
All cars will have a "black box" by 2012, if not before. I blame greedy attys. My apologizes to the non-tort attys out there.
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/24/f...-to-black-box/
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/24/f...-to-black-box/
Could be useful. Once again, if it's there to use, I'll eventually find a use for it. Maybe to prevent lead-footed stepfathers (like mine) from hotdoggin' your car when he takes it to the store real quick, or if your like me, while I'm deployed. That's a LOT of oppertunities to ride it hard while I'm gone!
Yeah, I think the tuner works fine for people who really want to limit the car.. but.. this is not a good thing.
<Paranoid Fearmongering>
If one day, every car produced has this feature, it will not be long before the government will mandate that every car has this feature - and then it's very easy to see the government imposing restrictions on our own driving.
Got a speeding ticket? Your car gets detuned by the State and you cannot rev past 5k RPM or drive faster than 80mph for 60 months.
And then 10 years after that, it will be easy to just do away with the speeding punishment completely - why not just make speeding impossible to begin with? Then your max speed will be automatically determined by the speed limit on the road you're on, as determined by the GPS.
Hard to believe? Remember this post in 25 years. Ok. Done fearmongering.
</Fearmongering>
<Paranoid Fearmongering>
If one day, every car produced has this feature, it will not be long before the government will mandate that every car has this feature - and then it's very easy to see the government imposing restrictions on our own driving.
Got a speeding ticket? Your car gets detuned by the State and you cannot rev past 5k RPM or drive faster than 80mph for 60 months.
And then 10 years after that, it will be easy to just do away with the speeding punishment completely - why not just make speeding impossible to begin with? Then your max speed will be automatically determined by the speed limit on the road you're on, as determined by the GPS.
Hard to believe? Remember this post in 25 years. Ok. Done fearmongering.

</Fearmongering>
And actually if you are driving unsafely enough to have such a drastic measure taken, then I would probably be in favor of it.
And mark my words, they will enact these drastic measures on EVERYONE, eventually. Why spend billions on highway patrol when you can just make sure everyone drives exactly 55mph? Like I said, check back in 25 years.. you will not have to do anything unsafe in order to have your rights limited drastically.
All you (figuratively, you = the masses, the people) have to do is continue to be sheep.
Last edited by krnpimpsta; Oct 8, 2008 at 10:22 PM.
Why spend billions on highway patrol when you can just make sure everyone drives exactly 55mph? Like I said, check back in 25 years.. you will not have to do anything unsafe in order to have your rights limited drastically.
All you (figuratively, you = the masses, the people) have to do is continue to be sheep.
All you (figuratively, you = the masses, the people) have to do is continue to be sheep.
The only thing the government likes more than control of the sheep is fleecing the sheep... and believe it when I tell you that many traffic laws, while good in principle, are really just more ways to separate you from your money, giving it back to the government which in turn gets to make more laws... etc...
The government has the ability to, but it will take a few decades before the public will be swayed into supporting it.
And mark my words, they will enact these drastic measures on EVERYONE, eventually. Why spend billions on highway patrol when you can just make sure everyone drives exactly 55mph? Like I said, check back in 25 years.. you will not have to do anything unsafe in order to have your rights limited drastically.
All you (figuratively, you = the masses, the people) have to do is continue to be sheep.
And mark my words, they will enact these drastic measures on EVERYONE, eventually. Why spend billions on highway patrol when you can just make sure everyone drives exactly 55mph? Like I said, check back in 25 years.. you will not have to do anything unsafe in order to have your rights limited drastically.
All you (figuratively, you = the masses, the people) have to do is continue to be sheep.
Not gonna happen. We Americans are too ornery, too independent (and too self-centered, in all honesty) to allow our "leaders" to hobble us to that degree, IMHO. We will always (again, IMO) find a way to buck the system, to maintain at least an illusion of freedom and independence.
Yes, there are many sheep among us these days, but I think the non-sheep are still the majority, and even in some future minority status will be strong enough to keep us vehicularly independent for the next 100 years or more.
We may all be driving glorified golf carts in 50 years or so, but even then the hot-rodders among us will find a way to hop them up. The government tried to hobble us once before with the 55 mph speed limit. How many "sheep" obeyed that law? Not bloody many.
As for the "black boxes", there was already one recent attempt to allow them to collect & maintain speed, location, accelerator, braking, time of day, etc. data for "accident analysis". With GPS and all the sensors already in most vehicles, it's a very easy & cheap thing to do. Fortunately, this was beaten back by the civil libertarians as an invasion of privacy. While it is allowed for some fleet vehicles, IIRC, it is NOT allowed for POVs. (Not yet, anyway. One of the few instances where I support the ACLU...)
Long live vehicular freedom and driver-only control (at least, for adult drivers...)!!!
Last edited by Zoomie; Oct 9, 2008 at 08:12 AM.
Again, this same tune was sung over 25 years ago, and we ain't there yet. While we have the technology, the infrastructure cost to implement is prohibitive. We can't even maintain the infrastructure we have now, and all "mass" transit systems are so heavily subsidized by the vast majority that do NOT use them in order to keep the usage cost semi-reasonable that there's little room for improvement there. At least not until fuel prices reach $20/gal or so in today's dollars.
Not gonna happen. We Americans are too ornery, too independent (and too self-centered, in all honesty) to allow our "leaders" to hobble us to that degree, IMHO. We will always (again, IMO) find a way to buck the system, to maintain at least an illusion of freedom and independence.
Yes, there are many sheep among us these days, but I think the non-sheep are still the majority, and even in some future minority status will be strong enough to keep us vehicularly independent for the next 100 years or more.
We may all be driving glorified golf carts in 50 years or so, but even then the hot-rodders among us will find a way to hop them up. The government tried to hobble us once before with the 55 mph speed limit. How many "sheep" obeyed that law? Not bloody many.
As for the "black boxes", there was already one recent attempt to allow them to collect & maintain speed, location, accelerator, braking, time of day, etc. data for "accident analysis". With GPS and all the sensors already in most vehicles, it's a very easy & cheap thing to do. Fortunately, this was beaten back by the civil libertarians as an invasion of privacy. While it is allowed for some fleet vehicles, IIRC, it is NOT allowed for POVs. (Not yet, anyway. One of the few instances where I support the ACLU...)
Long live vehicular freedom and driver-only control (at least, for adult drivers...)!!!
Not gonna happen. We Americans are too ornery, too independent (and too self-centered, in all honesty) to allow our "leaders" to hobble us to that degree, IMHO. We will always (again, IMO) find a way to buck the system, to maintain at least an illusion of freedom and independence.
Yes, there are many sheep among us these days, but I think the non-sheep are still the majority, and even in some future minority status will be strong enough to keep us vehicularly independent for the next 100 years or more.
We may all be driving glorified golf carts in 50 years or so, but even then the hot-rodders among us will find a way to hop them up. The government tried to hobble us once before with the 55 mph speed limit. How many "sheep" obeyed that law? Not bloody many.
As for the "black boxes", there was already one recent attempt to allow them to collect & maintain speed, location, accelerator, braking, time of day, etc. data for "accident analysis". With GPS and all the sensors already in most vehicles, it's a very easy & cheap thing to do. Fortunately, this was beaten back by the civil libertarians as an invasion of privacy. While it is allowed for some fleet vehicles, IIRC, it is NOT allowed for POVs. (Not yet, anyway. One of the few instances where I support the ACLU...)
Long live vehicular freedom and driver-only control (at least, for adult drivers...)!!!
Second, the black boxes are available to the courts by court order. So you aren't completely safe. And in fact, to make those court orders easier to enforce the federal government has created regulations to standardize what info is recorded and how it is recorded. Much like the OBD system of every car is identical.
Similar so-called black boxes, or electronic data recorders (EDRs), are now standard equipment in a majority of passenger cars and light-duty trucks sold in the United States. Wired into airbag sensors, yaw and stability sensors, antilock brake and traction controllers, electronic throttle controls and engine monitors, EDRs soon will collect a bewildering amount of data in keeping with pending federal regulations aimed at standardizing information available from the devices. Those regulations, finalized earlier this year and set to go into effect Sept. 1, 2012 (on 2013-model-year vehicles), specify exactly how much and what types of information must be collected and saved electronically in the event of a crash or airbag deployment.
...
All data recorded by the EDR technically are owned by the vehicle owner or lessee, but every manufacturer has adopted a variation of a policy spelled out in most owner's manuals that says data will be released only with the permission of the owner or under court order to third parties and law-enforcement officers. Safety agencies also may have access to the data with vehicle owners' permission.
...
All data recorded by the EDR technically are owned by the vehicle owner or lessee, but every manufacturer has adopted a variation of a policy spelled out in most owner's manuals that says data will be released only with the permission of the owner or under court order to third parties and law-enforcement officers. Safety agencies also may have access to the data with vehicle owners' permission.
http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dl...809189970/1065
Yup, that was the reference I had in mind. Couldn't recall the source, though.
I also thought there was a reference somewhere to the recording being limited to the last 30 seconds before an "event", but I could be wrong.
Sorry I didn't get the less-than-serious intent. My bad.
The only point I was really trying to make is that it's up to us as Americans and individuals to keep this kind of stuff from taking over our lives, let alone our driving habits. And that I have faith in the contrary nature of enough Americans, especially car guys and gals, to keep "1984" from becoming reality...
I also thought there was a reference somewhere to the recording being limited to the last 30 seconds before an "event", but I could be wrong.
Sorry I didn't get the less-than-serious intent. My bad.
The only point I was really trying to make is that it's up to us as Americans and individuals to keep this kind of stuff from taking over our lives, let alone our driving habits. And that I have faith in the contrary nature of enough Americans, especially car guys and gals, to keep "1984" from becoming reality...
Yup, that was the reference I had in mind. Couldn't recall the source, though.
I also thought there was a reference somewhere to the recording being limited to the last 30 seconds before an "event", but I could be wrong.
Sorry I didn't get the less-than-serious intent. My bad.
The only point I was really trying to make is that it's up to us as Americans and individuals to keep this kind of stuff from taking over our lives, let alone our driving habits. And that I have faith in the contrary nature of enough Americans, especially car guys and gals, to keep "1984" from becoming reality...
I also thought there was a reference somewhere to the recording being limited to the last 30 seconds before an "event", but I could be wrong.
Sorry I didn't get the less-than-serious intent. My bad.
The only point I was really trying to make is that it's up to us as Americans and individuals to keep this kind of stuff from taking over our lives, let alone our driving habits. And that I have faith in the contrary nature of enough Americans, especially car guys and gals, to keep "1984" from becoming reality...
And I'm fairly sure that I read that most record only 5 seconds prior to the accident. But I think that was just referring to what was currently common practice not what the new regulations will require.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Diode Dynamics
Vendor Showcase
3
Jun 12, 2018 03:26 PM




