2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

2010 Ford Vehicles Have Mykey feature

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 01:20 PM
  #1  
Cocheese's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: August 28, 2007
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
2010 Ford Vehicles Have Mykey feature

May be old news? But I saw this on the news last night, pretty cool feature. I imagine it will end up on the 2010 Mustang

http://jalopnik.com/5059406/ford-nan...d-radio-volume
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 01:48 PM
  #2  
jgray5's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: July 20, 2005
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
ahh...thats terrible not a fan of that...but i guess i dont have kids yet but still....
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 02:11 PM
  #3  
stangrider98's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: April 15, 2008
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
From: Norfolk/Hampton VA
i would not like this in my mustang, it seems like something a soccer mom in a van would have.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 03:44 PM
  #4  
AWmustang's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 12, 2004
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 7
From: Milwaukee, WI
Originally Posted by stangrider98
i would not like this in my mustang, it seems like something a soccer mom in a van would have.
It's not like there would be some sticker in the car saying "Soccer Mom".

It's simply the computer changing the limits or behaviors of some of the vehicles systems IF activated to a certain key.

If you never turn it on you'll never know it's there.

But think of the possibilities for a valet key. Keep the teenager from hot ******* in your 400HP muscle car.

In theory this is already possible with a tuner like one from Brenspeed. Though reflashing your car everytime the kid takes it wouldn't be very convenient, technically your car already has everything it needs for this MyKey system except the button to activate it.

Last edited by AWmustang; Oct 7, 2008 at 03:45 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 03:58 PM
  #5  
MBK's Avatar
MBK
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 31, 2008
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
if i can control it i dont care
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 05:04 PM
  #6  
krnpimpsta's Avatar
 
Joined: May 31, 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: Washington DC Metro Area
Yeah, I think the tuner works fine for people who really want to limit the car.. but.. this is not a good thing.

<Paranoid Fearmongering>
If one day, every car produced has this feature, it will not be long before the government will mandate that every car has this feature - and then it's very easy to see the government imposing restrictions on our own driving.

Got a speeding ticket? Your car gets detuned by the State and you cannot rev past 5k RPM or drive faster than 80mph for 60 months.

And then 10 years after that, it will be easy to just do away with the speeding punishment completely - why not just make speeding impossible to begin with? Then your max speed will be automatically determined by the speed limit on the road you're on, as determined by the GPS.

Hard to believe? Remember this post in 25 years. Ok. Done fearmongering.
</Fearmongering>
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 06:21 PM
  #7  
mjbarnet's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 3, 2005
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Iowa City
All cars will have a "black box" by 2012, if not before. I blame greedy attys. My apologizes to the non-tort attys out there.

http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/24/f...-to-black-box/
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2008 | 10:24 PM
  #8  
sscobra's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 27, 2004
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Bad news!
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2008 | 08:37 AM
  #9  
Ice Hawk's Avatar
 
Joined: December 3, 2007
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Florida
Could be useful. Once again, if it's there to use, I'll eventually find a use for it. Maybe to prevent lead-footed stepfathers (like mine) from hotdoggin' your car when he takes it to the store real quick, or if your like me, while I'm deployed. That's a LOT of oppertunities to ride it hard while I'm gone!
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2008 | 12:35 PM
  #10  
AWmustang's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 12, 2004
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 7
From: Milwaukee, WI
Originally Posted by krnpimpsta
Yeah, I think the tuner works fine for people who really want to limit the car.. but.. this is not a good thing.

<Paranoid Fearmongering>
If one day, every car produced has this feature, it will not be long before the government will mandate that every car has this feature - and then it's very easy to see the government imposing restrictions on our own driving.

Got a speeding ticket? Your car gets detuned by the State and you cannot rev past 5k RPM or drive faster than 80mph for 60 months.

And then 10 years after that, it will be easy to just do away with the speeding punishment completely - why not just make speeding impossible to begin with? Then your max speed will be automatically determined by the speed limit on the road you're on, as determined by the GPS.

Hard to believe? Remember this post in 25 years. Ok. Done fearmongering.
</Fearmongering>
Modern computer controlled cars already have the capability to do this. If the government wanted to do it, they could be already.

And actually if you are driving unsafely enough to have such a drastic measure taken, then I would probably be in favor of it.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2008 | 10:20 PM
  #11  
krnpimpsta's Avatar
 
Joined: May 31, 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: Washington DC Metro Area
Originally Posted by AWmustang
Modern computer controlled cars already have the capability to do this. If the government wanted to do it, they could be already.

And actually if you are driving unsafely enough to have such a drastic measure taken, then I would probably be in favor of it.
The government has the ability to, but it will take a few decades before the public will be swayed into supporting it.

And mark my words, they will enact these drastic measures on EVERYONE, eventually. Why spend billions on highway patrol when you can just make sure everyone drives exactly 55mph? Like I said, check back in 25 years.. you will not have to do anything unsafe in order to have your rights limited drastically.

All you (figuratively, you = the masses, the people) have to do is continue to be sheep.

Last edited by krnpimpsta; Oct 8, 2008 at 10:22 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2008 | 11:14 PM
  #12  
SilverHorse-----Racing's Avatar
Legacy Tms Member
 
Joined: January 9, 2005
Posts: 2,037
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by krnpimpsta
Why spend billions on highway patrol when you can just make sure everyone drives exactly 55mph? Like I said, check back in 25 years.. you will not have to do anything unsafe in order to have your rights limited drastically.

All you (figuratively, you = the masses, the people) have to do is continue to be sheep.
While I agree with a lot of where you're going with this, remember one thing...

The only thing the government likes more than control of the sheep is fleecing the sheep... and believe it when I tell you that many traffic laws, while good in principle, are really just more ways to separate you from your money, giving it back to the government which in turn gets to make more laws... etc...
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2008 | 07:45 AM
  #13  
AWmustang's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 12, 2004
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 7
From: Milwaukee, WI
Originally Posted by krnpimpsta
The government has the ability to, but it will take a few decades before the public will be swayed into supporting it.

And mark my words, they will enact these drastic measures on EVERYONE, eventually. Why spend billions on highway patrol when you can just make sure everyone drives exactly 55mph? Like I said, check back in 25 years.. you will not have to do anything unsafe in order to have your rights limited drastically.

All you (figuratively, you = the masses, the people) have to do is continue to be sheep.
In 25 years we won't even be driving our cars. We'll have something like what's in I, Robot or The Minority Report.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2008 | 08:10 AM
  #14  
Zoomie's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 28, 2008
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by AWmustang
In 25 years we won't even be driving our cars. We'll have something like what's in I, Robot or The Minority Report.
Again, this same tune was sung over 25 years ago, and we ain't there yet. While we have the technology, the infrastructure cost to implement is prohibitive. We can't even maintain the infrastructure we have now, and all "mass" transit systems are so heavily subsidized by the vast majority that do NOT use them in order to keep the usage cost semi-reasonable that there's little room for improvement there. At least not until fuel prices reach $20/gal or so in today's dollars.

Not gonna happen. We Americans are too ornery, too independent (and too self-centered, in all honesty) to allow our "leaders" to hobble us to that degree, IMHO. We will always (again, IMO) find a way to buck the system, to maintain at least an illusion of freedom and independence.

Yes, there are many sheep among us these days, but I think the non-sheep are still the majority, and even in some future minority status will be strong enough to keep us vehicularly independent for the next 100 years or more.

We may all be driving glorified golf carts in 50 years or so, but even then the hot-rodders among us will find a way to hop them up. The government tried to hobble us once before with the 55 mph speed limit. How many "sheep" obeyed that law? Not bloody many.

As for the "black boxes", there was already one recent attempt to allow them to collect & maintain speed, location, accelerator, braking, time of day, etc. data for "accident analysis". With GPS and all the sensors already in most vehicles, it's a very easy & cheap thing to do. Fortunately, this was beaten back by the civil libertarians as an invasion of privacy. While it is allowed for some fleet vehicles, IIRC, it is NOT allowed for POVs. (Not yet, anyway. One of the few instances where I support the ACLU...)

Long live vehicular freedom and driver-only control (at least, for adult drivers...)!!!

Last edited by Zoomie; Oct 9, 2008 at 08:12 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2008 | 03:12 PM
  #15  
AWmustang's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 12, 2004
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 7
From: Milwaukee, WI
Originally Posted by Zoomie
Again, this same tune was sung over 25 years ago, and we ain't there yet. While we have the technology, the infrastructure cost to implement is prohibitive. We can't even maintain the infrastructure we have now, and all "mass" transit systems are so heavily subsidized by the vast majority that do NOT use them in order to keep the usage cost semi-reasonable that there's little room for improvement there. At least not until fuel prices reach $20/gal or so in today's dollars.

Not gonna happen. We Americans are too ornery, too independent (and too self-centered, in all honesty) to allow our "leaders" to hobble us to that degree, IMHO. We will always (again, IMO) find a way to buck the system, to maintain at least an illusion of freedom and independence.

Yes, there are many sheep among us these days, but I think the non-sheep are still the majority, and even in some future minority status will be strong enough to keep us vehicularly independent for the next 100 years or more.

We may all be driving glorified golf carts in 50 years or so, but even then the hot-rodders among us will find a way to hop them up. The government tried to hobble us once before with the 55 mph speed limit. How many "sheep" obeyed that law? Not bloody many.

As for the "black boxes", there was already one recent attempt to allow them to collect & maintain speed, location, accelerator, braking, time of day, etc. data for "accident analysis". With GPS and all the sensors already in most vehicles, it's a very easy & cheap thing to do. Fortunately, this was beaten back by the civil libertarians as an invasion of privacy. While it is allowed for some fleet vehicles, IIRC, it is NOT allowed for POVs. (Not yet, anyway. One of the few instances where I support the ACLU...)

Long live vehicular freedom and driver-only control (at least, for adult drivers...)!!!
First of all I wasn't being serious. I thought the movie references would have made that clear. I apologize for not putting a silly smiley face to drive the point home.

Second, the black boxes are available to the courts by court order. So you aren't completely safe. And in fact, to make those court orders easier to enforce the federal government has created regulations to standardize what info is recorded and how it is recorded. Much like the OBD system of every car is identical.

Similar so-called black boxes, or electronic data recorders (EDRs), are now standard equipment in a majority of passenger cars and light-duty trucks sold in the United States. Wired into airbag sensors, yaw and stability sensors, antilock brake and traction controllers, electronic throttle controls and engine monitors, EDRs soon will collect a bewildering amount of data in keeping with pending federal regulations aimed at standardizing information available from the devices. Those regulations, finalized earlier this year and set to go into effect Sept. 1, 2012 (on 2013-model-year vehicles), specify exactly how much and what types of information must be collected and saved electronically in the event of a crash or airbag deployment.
...
All data recorded by the EDR technically are owned by the vehicle owner or lessee, but every manufacturer has adopted a variation of a policy spelled out in most owner's manuals that says data will be released only with the permission of the owner or under court order to third parties and law-enforcement officers. Safety agencies also may have access to the data with vehicle owners' permission.

http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dl...809189970/1065
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2008 | 03:28 PM
  #16  
Zoomie's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 28, 2008
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
Yup, that was the reference I had in mind. Couldn't recall the source, though.

I also thought there was a reference somewhere to the recording being limited to the last 30 seconds before an "event", but I could be wrong.

Sorry I didn't get the less-than-serious intent. My bad.

The only point I was really trying to make is that it's up to us as Americans and individuals to keep this kind of stuff from taking over our lives, let alone our driving habits. And that I have faith in the contrary nature of enough Americans, especially car guys and gals, to keep "1984" from becoming reality...
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2008 | 07:16 AM
  #17  
AWmustang's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 12, 2004
Posts: 1,188
Likes: 7
From: Milwaukee, WI
Originally Posted by Zoomie
Yup, that was the reference I had in mind. Couldn't recall the source, though.

I also thought there was a reference somewhere to the recording being limited to the last 30 seconds before an "event", but I could be wrong.

Sorry I didn't get the less-than-serious intent. My bad.

The only point I was really trying to make is that it's up to us as Americans and individuals to keep this kind of stuff from taking over our lives, let alone our driving habits. And that I have faith in the contrary nature of enough Americans, especially car guys and gals, to keep "1984" from becoming reality...
I agree with you there on that point. My fear is that people will just sit back till it's too late.

And I'm fairly sure that I read that most record only 5 seconds prior to the accident. But I think that was just referring to what was currently common practice not what the new regulations will require.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jim74656
SN95 Mustang
8
May 1, 2023 02:15 AM
Diode Dynamics
Vendor Showcase
3
Jun 12, 2018 03:26 PM
JonathonK
GT350
6
Sep 17, 2015 10:13 AM
Sacmus
1964-1970 Mustang
1
Jul 22, 2015 02:59 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:33 AM.