2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

1,145 HP & 1,018 lb-ft of torque @ 20 PSI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 15, 2016 | 03:53 PM
  #21  
xtc.inc's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: December 22, 2010
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 9
Originally Posted by Stage_3
LOL
Gary,.............
Youre getting a camaro? Saw your avi changed lol, whats that about?
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2016 | 07:32 AM
  #22  
ford20's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 1, 2010
Posts: 3,033
Likes: 66
From: White Plains, NY
Originally Posted by MRGTX
Thats not a built motor, right? How long do you suspect a Coyote would live at that power level?
Only a quality tune, as Tony said, it should last for quite some time. Although Turbo > Blower without a shadow of a doubt IMO. The video above that has a turbo car at 8lbs. making more power than the S/C car at 11lbs. not to mention it also leaves a little wiggle room for the engine. You can creep higher into the "danger zone" since the turbo kit puts less strain on the engine since it is all about efficiency.
Reply
Old Feb 16, 2016 | 09:47 AM
  #23  
MRGTX's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: May 18, 2010
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 15
From: CT
Originally Posted by ford20
Only a quality tune, as Tony said, it should last for quite some time. Although Turbo > Blower without a shadow of a doubt IMO. The video above that has a turbo car at 8lbs. making more power than the S/C car at 11lbs. not to mention it also leaves a little wiggle room for the engine. You can creep higher into the "danger zone" since the turbo kit puts less strain on the engine since it is all about efficiency.
Interesting, Ford20...could this be related to the ramp-up of power with a turbo versus the instantaneous hit of power with the SC?

IIRC, the big boost at low RPM with the SC means higher cylinder pressures while the piston is essentially spending more time at TDC...and therefore absorbing more heat from the compressed mixture...

...more heat means impending knock.

Is that about right?
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2016 | 08:38 PM
  #24  
ford20's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 1, 2010
Posts: 3,033
Likes: 66
From: White Plains, NY
Originally Posted by MRGTX
Interesting, Ford20...could this be related to the ramp-up of power with a turbo versus the instantaneous hit of power with the SC?

IIRC, the big boost at low RPM with the SC means higher cylinder pressures while the piston is essentially spending more time at TDC...and therefore absorbing more heat from the compressed mixture...

...more heat means impending knock.

Is that about right?
From what I can recall from my conversations with Eric @ JPC and I may not be remembering correctly is because the efficency of the turbo you can make the same amount of power at a lower boost level. This allows you to go further into the danger zone by upping the boost levels to that of supercharged cars. An example of the 2 videos posted where the turbo car was making 670 at 8lbs and the Roush was making 650 at 11lbs. You can then turn the boost up to 11lbs. and theoretically still be dealing the same amount of pressures on the internals while gaining more power.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mopa
GT
1
Dec 30, 2015 04:48 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:57 AM.