Notices
2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By:

0-60 - what does track apps say?are they?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 6/6/15, 08:18 PM
  #1  
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
 
jim010's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 7, 2006
Location: Alberta
Posts: 2,790
Received 40 Likes on 35 Posts
0-60 - what does track apps say?are they?

I am trying to determine what is normal for a 5.0 automatic and I am asking those of you with Track Apps - what are you recording in Track Apps for a 0-60 time?

My car is a 2012 5.0 automatic. Running on 91 octane, I am able to achieve 0-60 of 5.5 -6.0 sec. Once I did 5.2 This seems slow to me. What are all of you getting with your automatics? Please share.

Cheers
Old 6/7/15, 12:12 AM
  #2  
V6 Member
 
stewarts359's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 28, 2015
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I've done a 5.2 in my stock manual
Old 6/7/15, 03:40 AM
  #3  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
2011 Kona Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 26, 2011
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by jim010
I am trying to determine what is normal for a 5.0 automatic and I am asking those of you with Track Apps - what are you recording in Track Apps for a 0-60 time?

My car is a 2012 5.0 automatic. Running on 91 octane, I am able to achieve 0-60 of 5.5 -6.0 sec. Once I did 5.2 This seems slow to me. What are all of you getting with your automatics? Please share.

Cheers
You're track apps must be way off. My slow little 3.7 automatic runs 0-60 mph around 4.7 seconds
Old 6/7/15, 07:29 AM
  #4  
GT Member
 
Turbo302's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 24, 2014
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Just last weekend I got my all time best of 4.5 sec 0-60. 100%stock fully loaded late 2014 5.0 6A car.

Was in "s" mode trac control on and I just stomped on it from dead stop with perfect traction.

I don't buy any stock 3.7 being anywhere near sub 5 sec. I've driven plenty and there a pooch. Maybe get lucky with sticky tires and an aggressive launch stick car, but no way stock showroom condition.

Last edited by Turbo302; 6/7/15 at 08:14 AM.
Old 6/7/15, 12:58 PM
  #5  
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
 
jim010's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 7, 2006
Location: Alberta
Posts: 2,790
Received 40 Likes on 35 Posts
Originally Posted by Turbo302
Just last weekend I got my all time best of 4.5 sec 0-60. 100%stock fully loaded late 2014 5.0 6A car.

Was in "s" mode trac control on and I just stomped on it from dead stop with perfect traction.

I don't buy any stock 3.7 being anywhere near sub 5 sec. I've driven plenty and there a pooch. Maybe get lucky with sticky tires and an aggressive launch stick car, but no way stock showroom condition.
OK, I am slower than I should be, then. Do you consistently get 4.5? With a tune, I've gotten 5.1 - 6.0. I don't think I'm getting all my ponies under the hood.
Old 6/7/15, 01:13 PM
  #6  
Cobra R Member
 
Joeywhat's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 6, 2014
Location: Motor City
Posts: 1,575
Received 41 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by jim010
OK, I am slower than I should be, then. Do you consistently get 4.5? With a tune, I've gotten 5.1 - 6.0. I don't think I'm getting all my ponies under the hood.
If you're getting that wide a range, I'm betting it's a driver issue more then anything.

If you have traction control on then it will be a serious challenge to get anywhere close to the rated time. You'll also have to be good on the throttle to keep from just spinning the tires for a while.
Old 6/7/15, 04:43 PM
  #7  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
2011 Kona Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 26, 2011
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Turbo302
Just last weekend I got my all time best of 4.5 sec 0-60. 100%stock fully loaded late 2014 5.0 6A car.

Was in "s" mode trac control on and I just stomped on it from dead stop with perfect traction.

I don't buy any stock 3.7 being anywhere near sub 5 sec. I've driven plenty and there a pooch. Maybe get lucky with sticky tires and an aggressive launch stick car, but no way stock showroom condition.
You absolutely correct that a stock 3.7 is not getting sub 5 second 0-60 mph. My N/A 3.7 is far from stock and has no issue using its 300 rwhp, 3:73 gears achieving under 5 second 0-60 mph runs. Because the lack of torque in my 3.7 I don't have traction issues when the temps and roads are warmer so it hooks fine with factory tires.
Old 6/7/15, 04:48 PM
  #8  
Mach 1 Member
 
Cdvision's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 25, 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by 2011 Kona Blue
You absolutely correct that a stock 3.7 is not getting sub 5 second 0-60 mph. My N/A 3.7 is far from stock and has no issue using its 300 rwhp, 3:73 gears achieving under 5 second 0-60 mph runs. Because the lack of torque in my 3.7 I don't have traction issues when the temps and roads are warmer so it hooks fine with factory tires.
That's all I have to say.
Old 6/7/15, 04:52 PM
  #9  
Mach 1 Member
 
Cdvision's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 25, 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
I pulled a best of 4.4 with my wife's 5.0 stock. Had to roll on the throttle and it was still hazing the rear tires a little. I'm at sea level so that makes for quicker times than higher altitudes.
Old 6/7/15, 04:52 PM
  #10  
GT Member
 
Turbo302's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 24, 2014
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by jim010
OK, I am slower than I should be, then. Do you consistently get 4.5? With a tune, I've gotten 5.1 - 6.0. I don't think I'm getting all my ponies under the hood.
This was my all time best. I don't drive the car often and it currently has 2300 miles on it and I ran that 4.5 just recently. I figure it's "loosening up" and getting stronger. Mine is a "late 14" which has the 2015 head castings. When it had around 1000 mi on it I ran at strip and did a 12.9@109 and would consistently get between 4.6-4.9 at that point.
Old 6/7/15, 05:10 PM
  #11  
Cobra R Member
 
Joeywhat's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 6, 2014
Location: Motor City
Posts: 1,575
Received 41 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by 2011 Kona Blue
You absolutely correct that a stock 3.7 is not getting sub 5 second 0-60 mph. My N/A 3.7 is far from stock and has no issue using its 300 rwhp, 3:73 gears achieving under 5 second 0-60 mph runs. Because the lack of torque in my 3.7 I don't have traction issues when the temps and roads are warmer so it hooks fine with factory tires.
Then why even comment? What is the point of telling us that your not-stock 3.7 can run a sub 5 second 0-60? How is that in any way useful for the OP?
Old 6/7/15, 09:26 PM
  #12  
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
 
jim010's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 7, 2006
Location: Alberta
Posts: 2,790
Received 40 Likes on 35 Posts
Originally Posted by Joeywhat
If you're getting that wide a range, I'm betting it's a driver issue more then anything.

If you have traction control on then it will be a serious challenge to get anywhere close to the rated time. You'll also have to be good on the throttle to keep from just spinning the tires for a while.
The range was under different conditions, but being an auto, I can't imagine much input required on my end. I use the automatic start for timing.

I'll see what I get with trac off.
Old 6/7/15, 09:55 PM
  #13  
Cobra R Member
 
Joeywhat's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 6, 2014
Location: Motor City
Posts: 1,575
Received 41 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by jim010
The range was under different conditions, but being an auto, I can't imagine much input required on my end. I use the automatic start for timing.

I'll see what I get with trac off.
With as much power as a GT has, yes it requires a bit of work on your end. Can't just mash the go pedal, with traction control on it will certainly reduce torque to the rear wheels to keep them from spinning. With it off it will certainly just roast the tires.

Need to be on the throttle just enough to get maximum acceleration without spinning the tires.
Old 6/7/15, 09:58 PM
  #14  
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
 
jim010's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 7, 2006
Location: Alberta
Posts: 2,790
Received 40 Likes on 35 Posts
OK, I'll give it a go and report back. Car goes in for some waranty stuff and the airbag recall tomorrow, so I'll try again tonight or when I get it back.
Old 6/7/15, 10:34 PM
  #15  
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
 
jim010's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 7, 2006
Location: Alberta
Posts: 2,790
Received 40 Likes on 35 Posts
Just came back and tried without trac. Although, I can't spin my tires with track off either - or even in sport track mode. Time was 5.6, but I didn't launch perfect. I need to do this on a quiter stretch of road.
Old 6/7/15, 10:56 PM
  #16  
Cobra R Member
 
Joeywhat's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 6, 2014
Location: Motor City
Posts: 1,575
Received 41 Likes on 38 Posts
Turn advancetrac off entirely (long press the button). Sport mode allows only a slight amount of wheel spin.
Old 6/8/15, 06:12 AM
  #17  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
2011 Kona Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 26, 2011
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Joeywhat
Then why even comment? What is the point of telling us that your not-stock 3.7 can run a sub 5 second 0-60? How is that in any way useful for the OP?
It helps the OP because he has a 370 rwhp 5.0 and no way his track app is correct when my cylinder deficient 3.7 runs 0-60 mph in 4.7 seconds, his stock 5.0 should be faster than my modded 3.7. The point is, his track app is not correct and far from accurate. No way a factory 5.0 is running low to mid 5 second 0-60 mph runs. They are far faster than that. That's the point.

Last edited by 2011 Kona Blue; 6/8/15 at 06:13 AM.
Old 6/8/15, 07:59 AM
  #18  
Cobra Member
 
JoeMidnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 21, 2014
Location: Canada, Ontario
Posts: 1,099
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Hey OP, yeah, try and turn off the nannies and give it another whirl. Best I got on my V6 was 5.7

Others here on the forum have achieved mid 4's you Should be able to be in the mid to high 4's for sure!

practice makes perfect... I wouldn't waste too much time eating away at your tires trying to achieve it.
Old 6/8/15, 08:36 AM
  #19  
GT Member
 
Turbo302's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 24, 2014
Location: Twin Cities MN
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by jim010
Just came back and tried without trac. Although, I can't spin my tires with track off either - or even in sport track mode. Time was 5.6, but I didn't launch perfect. I need to do this on a quiter stretch of road.
One thing to consider is the elevation of where your at. I noticed Alberta is around 3500ft. Where I am in the Twin Cities MN is about 800ft. So I have denser air thus more power down here.

I remember driving my 92 Notch 5.0 through the Rockys once and felt like I had 30% less power up in elevation.
Old 6/8/15, 09:38 AM
  #20  
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
 
jim010's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 7, 2006
Location: Alberta
Posts: 2,790
Received 40 Likes on 35 Posts
Originally Posted by Turbo302
One thing to consider is the elevation of where your at. I noticed Alberta is around 3500ft. Where I am in the Twin Cities MN is about 800ft. So I have denser air thus more power down here.

I remember driving my 92 Notch 5.0 through the Rockys once and felt like I had 30% less power up in elevation.
Good point. When I was doing most of this testing this weekend, I was in the mountains.


Quick Reply: 0-60 - what does track apps say?are they?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:36 PM.