Dyno: Stock vs. Cat-Back vs. Headers + Tune
Thread Starter
The Mustang Source FOUNDER





Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 9,890
Likes: 11
From: Vestavia Hills, Ala.
The red line is the stock run; the green line is with the Magnaflow cat-back; the blue line is with the JBA titanium ceramic-coated headers and the BamaChips tune, although the tune wasn't what we'd expected since the tank was full of 87 instead of 93. We'll give it another shot with the right fuel. 
The peak numbers with the headers and tune aren't much better than the run with just the cat-back, but the gains across the RPM range are awesome.
The peak numbers with the headers and tune aren't much better than the run with just the cat-back, but the gains across the RPM range are awesome.
- Stock: 265.89 hp/280.05 ft.-lbs.
- Cat-Back: 269.72 hp/286.28 ft.-lbs.
- Headers + Tune: 271.43 hp/293.09 ft.-lbs.
Not a bad improvement with just a cat-back. +4 HP & +6 ft-lbs. I've got my Magnaflows in the garage. Running with the JBAs for now.
Which tune did you have installed? 87 performance or torque? No CAI yet? I've got my SCT X2 coming from Doug. Looking forward to it.
I'll be looking for an update with the 93 fuel as I'm getting one of those tunes too.
Which tune did you have installed? 87 performance or torque? No CAI yet? I've got my SCT X2 coming from Doug. Looking forward to it.
I'll be looking for an update with the 93 fuel as I'm getting one of those tunes too.
I acctually think he has a 93 tune in the car. The intent was to burn the tank of 87 and refil with 93, but Brad would have to verify as I was not there.
Originally posted by Scothew@December 6, 2005, 6:39 PM
I acctually think he has a 93 tune in the car. The intent was to burn the tank of 87 and refil with 93, but Brad would have to verify as I was not there.
I acctually think he has a 93 tune in the car. The intent was to burn the tank of 87 and refil with 93, but Brad would have to verify as I was not there.
Originally posted by joesmustang@December 10, 2005, 2:34 PM
I'm pretty sure Doug wouldn't put in a 93 octane tune while brad had a full tank of 87 octane.
I'm pretty sure Doug wouldn't put in a 93 octane tune while brad had a full tank of 87 octane.
Maybe Brad or Doug will chime in
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



