Ford Discussions Non-Mustang Ford Products

Production Lincoln MKS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8/12/06, 04:18 PM
  #21  
Legacy TMS Member
 
TomServo92's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,970
Received 24 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by 1969 Mustang Mach 1
Don't say the administrators didn't warn you
If you say so....
Old 8/12/06, 04:20 PM
  #22  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Knight Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 13, 2006
Location: McAllen, Texas
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

So the MKS should compete with who?
Old 8/12/06, 04:24 PM
  #23  
Legacy TMS Member
 
TomServo92's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,970
Received 24 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by 1969 Mustang Mach 1

So the MKS should compete with who?
I would say the Acura TL, Cadillac CTS, Infiniti G35, among others.
Old 8/12/06, 04:26 PM
  #24  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Knight Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 13, 2006
Location: McAllen, Texas
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They're heading the right way
Old 8/12/06, 04:32 PM
  #25  
Legacy TMS Member
 
TomServo92's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,970
Received 24 Likes on 20 Posts
I forgot Lexus GS.

I agree it's heading the right way if they stay as true to the concept as possible and build it with substantial quality.
Old 8/12/06, 04:59 PM
  #26  
Closet American
 
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 17, 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by TomServo92
The topic was the Lincoln MKS, not Lincolns in general.
In YOUR reality, maybe.

But if you really want to engage in this silly semantic debate, hey, I'm available...
Old 8/12/06, 05:06 PM
  #27  
Legacy TMS Member
 
TomServo92's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,970
Received 24 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by BC_Shelby
In YOUR reality, maybe.

But if you really want to engage in this silly semantic debate, hey, I'm available...
No, I don't really want to continue, especially since I didn't start it. However, I will give you a clue as to the subject of this thread since it seems to have eluded you: read the thread subject line.
Old 8/13/06, 04:14 AM
  #28  
Closet American
 
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 17, 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by TomServo92
However, I will give you a clue as to the subject of this thread since it seems to have eluded you: read the thread subject line.
Yeah, thanks for that, Captain Obvious.

I believe we're discussing LINCOLNS in this thread. You know, new models...current models...curb appeal...quality...safety...blah, blah, blah.

It's A to B to C stuff. It ain't rocket science.
Old 8/13/06, 06:31 AM
  #29  
Legacy TMS Member
 
TomServo92's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,970
Received 24 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by BC_Shelby
Yeah, thanks for that, Captain Obvious.

I believe we're discussing LINCOLNS in this thread. You know, new models...current models...curb appeal...quality...safety...blah, blah, blah.

It's A to B to C stuff. It ain't rocket science.
Since it took Captain Obvious to point out to you, what does that make you....Ensign Obvious???

BTW, even if A leads to B leads to C, it's still off-topic.
Old 8/13/06, 12:51 PM
  #30  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Moosetang's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To quote Kissenger's head: This is not a productive line of discussion
Old 8/13/06, 01:24 PM
  #31  
GT Member
 
05MustangFanII's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 2, 2005
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This gonna be powered by the 4.4l Yamaha V8? 3.5 Duratec V6? Both?

And, for the record, if SVT pulled an SRT..how would THIS beast be all SVT'ed up?
Old 8/13/06, 01:52 PM
  #32  
Legacy TMS Member
 
TomServo92's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,970
Received 24 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by 05MustangFanII
This gonna be powered by the 4.4l Yamaha V8? 3.5 Duratec V6? Both?

And, for the record, if SVT pulled an SRT..how would THIS beast be all SVT'ed up?
I read where it'll initially be powered by the 3.5L and the 4.4L V8 will arrive later. I'm not sure if later means "later in the model year" or the next model year.

SVT could supercharge the 4.4L to the tune of 400HP. Couple it with the AWD and you'd have a nice little luxury screamer!
Old 8/13/06, 10:52 PM
  #33  
Bullitt Member
 
SyNRG's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 22, 2005
Location: Brea, CA
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TomServo92
I would say the Acura TL, Cadillac CTS, Infiniti G35, among others.

really!? i would think since they're touting it as the "LS replacement", it would more or less be competing with say the 5 series, infiniti M's, Lex GS, Acura RL, no? eeeh, then again im just a peon, what do i know........
Old 8/14/06, 08:36 AM
  #34  
Legacy TMS Member
 
TomServo92's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,970
Received 24 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by SyNRG
really!? i would think since they're touting it as the "LS replacement", it would more or less be competing with say the 5 series, infiniti M's, Lex GS, Acura RL, no? eeeh, then again im just a peon, what do i know........
Well, I did mention the Lexus GS in a later post. You could be right though. Those were cars that popped into my head right off the bat.
Old 8/14/06, 12:59 PM
  #35  
Mach 1 Member
 
f1-cobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 770
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by TomServo92
I read where it'll initially be powered by the 3.5L and the 4.4L V8 will arrive later. I'm not sure if later means "later in the model year" or the next model year.

SVT could supercharge the 4.4L to the tune of 400HP. Couple it with the AWD and you'd have a nice little luxury screamer!
This might be a stupid question, but what happened to the 3.9L V8? I think it's a great little engine.
Old 8/14/06, 01:32 PM
  #36  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Moosetang's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
3.9L? You mean the AJ-V8 in 3.9L? It was panned for not being powerful enough in the T-Bird and LS. It died with the LS, though jag and LR use bigger-bore versions still.

The 4.4L can be transversely-mounted, which I think is a neccesity in the MKS's platform.
Old 8/14/06, 02:21 PM
  #37  
Legacy TMS Member
 
TomServo92's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,970
Received 24 Likes on 20 Posts
Originally Posted by Moosetang
The 4.4L can be transversely-mounted, which I think is a neccesity in the MKS's platform.
Correct. The 4.4L is a 60 degree "V" configuration instead of the normal 90 degree you see in most other V8s. It's makes it easier to implement in a transverse configuration since it's narrower.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
carid
Vendor Showcase
6
3/30/21 09:29 AM
UOP Shadow
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
6
9/27/15 07:24 AM
HoosierDaddy
Ford Discussions
0
9/22/15 03:18 PM
Evil_Capri
Mustang Motorsports
1
9/11/15 08:39 AM
carid
Vendor Showcase
0
9/10/15 08:31 AM



Quick Reply: Production Lincoln MKS



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:56 PM.