Lincoln MKS
#21
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
Originally posted by max2000jp@January 10, 2006, 11:10 AM
Here is the article I read: http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/a...=2005601090340
It states the MKS as Lincoln's Flagship. The TC is currently Lincoln's flagship vehicle. The MKS is a big car judging by the pics.
Edit: http://media.ford.com/products/press_artic...J$94$
Ford states it's a "full size" luxury sedan. The LS is a mid-sized luxury sedan. Sounds like a TC replacement to me.
Here is the article I read: http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/a...=2005601090340
It states the MKS as Lincoln's Flagship. The TC is currently Lincoln's flagship vehicle. The MKS is a big car judging by the pics.
Edit: http://media.ford.com/products/press_artic...J$94$
Ford states it's a "full size" luxury sedan. The LS is a mid-sized luxury sedan. Sounds like a TC replacement to me.
Secondly, you might want to read all the information from the links you post. The wheelbase of the MKS is 114.4, which is nearly identical to the LS at 114.5. Also, the overall length of the MKS (203.8) is very close to the LS (194.3). The TC by comparison has a wheelbase of 117.7 and a length of 215.4. I'd say the evidence leans more toward the MKS being an LS replacement rather than a TC replacement.
#22
Shelby GT500 Member
Join Date: September 2, 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by TomServo92@January 10, 2006, 12:36 PM
First, the Ford article states that it "hints" at the direction for large, flagship sedan but it doesn't say the MKS is a large sedan.
Secondly, you might want to read all the information from the links you post. The wheelbase of the MKS is 114.4, which is nearly identical to the LS at 114.5. Also, the overall length of the MKS (203.8) is very close to the LS (194.3). The TC by comparison has a wheelbase of 117.7 and a length of 215.4. I'd say the evidence leans more toward the MKS being an LS replacement rather than a TC replacement.
First, the Ford article states that it "hints" at the direction for large, flagship sedan but it doesn't say the MKS is a large sedan.
Secondly, you might want to read all the information from the links you post. The wheelbase of the MKS is 114.4, which is nearly identical to the LS at 114.5. Also, the overall length of the MKS (203.8) is very close to the LS (194.3). The TC by comparison has a wheelbase of 117.7 and a length of 215.4. I'd say the evidence leans more toward the MKS being an LS replacement rather than a TC replacement.
#23
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
Originally posted by max2000jp@January 10, 2006, 12:50 PM
Hints meaning that it's a concept car that has strong production possibilities in the near future. The car is a large sedan, look at the picture. I am sure we will see this car soon, but IMO it's too large to be an LS replacement. The LS was a midsized sedan. With a modern chassis and I am assuming a transverse mounted engine, you don't need the long vehicle length to sustain a large trunk and interior compartment. This car is about the size of an A8 or 745i which are large luxury sedans. Judging by size, it's closest to the late Continental. Either way it's a step in the right direction for Lincoln.
Hints meaning that it's a concept car that has strong production possibilities in the near future. The car is a large sedan, look at the picture. I am sure we will see this car soon, but IMO it's too large to be an LS replacement. The LS was a midsized sedan. With a modern chassis and I am assuming a transverse mounted engine, you don't need the long vehicle length to sustain a large trunk and interior compartment. This car is about the size of an A8 or 745i which are large luxury sedans. Judging by size, it's closest to the late Continental. Either way it's a step in the right direction for Lincoln.
#24
Shelby GT500 Member
Join Date: September 2, 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by TomServo92@January 10, 2006, 12:54 PM
Great way to sidestep the fact that the LS and MKS are the same size. I think you have a great future in politics!
Great way to sidestep the fact that the LS and MKS are the same size. I think you have a great future in politics!
Same Size?
LS: Overall Length 194.4 in
MKS: Overall Length 203.8 in.
Since when is a 9.4" difference the same size???????? Again, the LS is a midsized vehice(like the Jag S-type). This is a full sized sedan with similar dimesions to an A8 or 745i.
#25
Originally posted by max2000jp@January 10, 2006, 12:43 PM
Kenny I read that the MKS will be Lincoln's Flagship, so I would think that it's a replacement for the TC. Lincoln touts it as a large sized luxury sedan. The LS was and should remain a mid sized luxury sedan.
Kenny I read that the MKS will be Lincoln's Flagship, so I would think that it's a replacement for the TC. Lincoln touts it as a large sized luxury sedan. The LS was and should remain a mid sized luxury sedan.
The problem in the reporting is probably due to this. It has been well known that Ford is going to have 2 new sedans in 2007 as 2008 models for Lincoln. They were supposed to be built in Atlanta, but with the approaching rumors of the Jan. 23 company restructuring, there is a lot of belief that the new products will be shifted to the Wixom, Michigan plant, which had previously been rumored to close, and the closure may now be Atlanta's fate. We will not know any thing definate till the 23rd announcement. Also, it is worth pointing out that Wixom does currently build the Town Car.
For the past 1 to 2 years, it has been consistently reported that the two new models would be replacements for the LS and probably the Continental. There are rumors that the current Town Car will continue production in St. Thomas, Canada where it's structural twins the Crown Vic and Grand Marquis are currently built. So there is a mess of "what-ifs" going around. I think the general belief has been that the current Town Car would continue as it is, which would explain why the ideal of a Continental would arise, to fit between the LS replacement and an aging Town Car.
At closer look of the specifications, this MKS showcar is actually just a couple inches longer than the current FiveHundred in both wheelbase and overall length, so that would make good sense that this is the larger of the two cars, and not the smaller of the two as has been reported. The MKS is almost certainly the replacement for the Continental or Town Car, which one I do not think any can really answer with accuracy just yet. However, this platform will still very likely be the basis for the shorter sedan that will replace the LS too.
So like I mentioned, I think we are both right. This is the flagship model, but there will be an LS based off of it.
#27
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
Originally posted by max2000jp@January 10, 2006, 12:59 PM
Same Size?
LS: Overall Length 194.4 in
MKS: Overall Length 203.8 in.
Since when is a 9.4" difference the same size???????? Again, the LS is a midsized vehice(like the Jag S-type). This is a full sized sedan with similar dimesions to an A8 or 745i.
Same Size?
LS: Overall Length 194.4 in
MKS: Overall Length 203.8 in.
Since when is a 9.4" difference the same size???????? Again, the LS is a midsized vehice(like the Jag S-type). This is a full sized sedan with similar dimesions to an A8 or 745i.
2006 A8: WB 121" OL 204.4"
2006 S-Type: WB 114.5 OL 193.1"
The S-Type is exactly the same size as the LS and shares the same wheelbase as the MKS. A8 is essentially the same length as the MKS but has a longer wheelbase that yields more interior room and is closer in size to the TC than any of the other three. The MKS fits somewhere in between the LS and TC but due to the wheelbase, it's closer to the LS in size than the TC.
#28
Shelby GT500 Member
Join Date: September 2, 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by TomServo92@January 10, 2006, 1:45 PM
From Edmunds.com:
2006 A8: WB 121" OL 204.4"
2006 S-Type: WB 114.5 OL 193.1"
The S-Type is exactly the same size as the LS and shares the same wheelbase as the MKS. A8 is essentially the same length as the MKS but has a longer wheelbase that yields more interior room and is closer in size to the TC than any of the other three. The MKS fits somewhere in between the LS and TC but due to the wheelbase, it's closer to the LS in size than the TC.
From Edmunds.com:
2006 A8: WB 121" OL 204.4"
2006 S-Type: WB 114.5 OL 193.1"
The S-Type is exactly the same size as the LS and shares the same wheelbase as the MKS. A8 is essentially the same length as the MKS but has a longer wheelbase that yields more interior room and is closer in size to the TC than any of the other three. The MKS fits somewhere in between the LS and TC but due to the wheelbase, it's closer to the LS in size than the TC.
#29
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
Before this gets out of hand, I wanted to stop and reason this thing out. So let's review the facts. The MKS has the same wheelbase as the LS (114") yet it is 9.4" longers. So the questions is this: where is the extra length? Well, it can't be in the cabin area since that sits between the wheels. Therefore, it must be in the front and rear overhangs. Only in the rear overhang does that translate into more space (trunk) but based on the photos, it appears that the MKS has less rear overhang than the LS. So the additionaly inches must be in the front which is of little use to the occupants. Now, like was said earlier, the interior space could be optimized. While this is true, you still only have 114" of space between the wheels to work with and if memory serves, the LS was a pretty roomy car. So without any real data on interior volume I would have to guess there isn't that much more room in the MKS vs. LS. So, in review, you have a car that is longer than the LS yet most probably isn't that larger from an interior standpoint. We also know the wheelbase is shorter than other larger sedans (A8). So, IMO the MKS is more than likely not much larger than the LS from an interior standpoint (and certainly not as large as the TC) but is longer in overall length. Of course, interior volume is what determines if a car is mid- vs full-size not overall length so it's possible the MKS crosses the threshold into the full-size segment based upon more optimized interior space.
#30
Shelby GT500 Member
Join Date: September 2, 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by KWMJ-KTP@January 10, 2006, 1:37 PM
I agree with you, but I think we are both right. The information has been a little mixed between sources, and here is probably why. Ford is showing this car and acting as if it is just one car, instead of the ideal behind two near to market cars.
The problem in the reporting is probably due to this. It has been well known that Ford is going to have 2 new sedans in 2007 as 2008 models for Lincoln. They were supposed to be built in Atlanta, but with the approaching rumors of the Jan. 23 company restructuring, there is a lot of belief that the new products will be shifted to the Wixom, Michigan plant, which had previously been rumored to close, and the closure may now be Atlanta's fate. We will not know any thing definate till the 23rd announcement. Also, it is worth pointing out that Wixom does currently build the Town Car.
For the past 1 to 2 years, it has been consistently reported that the two new models would be replacements for the LS and probably the Continental. There are rumors that the current Town Car will continue production in St. Thomas, Canada where it's structural twins the Crown Vic and Grand Marquis are currently built. So there is a mess of "what-ifs" going around. I think the general belief has been that the current Town Car would continue as it is, which would explain why the ideal of a Continental would arise, to fit between the LS replacement and an aging Town Car.
At closer look of the specifications, this MKS showcar is actually just a couple inches longer than the current FiveHundred in both wheelbase and overall length, so that would make good sense that this is the larger of the two cars, and not the smaller of the two as has been reported. The MKS is almost certainly the replacement for the Continental or Town Car, which one I do not think any can really answer with accuracy just yet. However, this platform will still very likely be the basis for the shorter sedan that will replace the LS too.
So like I mentioned, I think we are both right. This is the flagship model, but there will be an LS based off of it.
I agree with you, but I think we are both right. The information has been a little mixed between sources, and here is probably why. Ford is showing this car and acting as if it is just one car, instead of the ideal behind two near to market cars.
The problem in the reporting is probably due to this. It has been well known that Ford is going to have 2 new sedans in 2007 as 2008 models for Lincoln. They were supposed to be built in Atlanta, but with the approaching rumors of the Jan. 23 company restructuring, there is a lot of belief that the new products will be shifted to the Wixom, Michigan plant, which had previously been rumored to close, and the closure may now be Atlanta's fate. We will not know any thing definate till the 23rd announcement. Also, it is worth pointing out that Wixom does currently build the Town Car.
For the past 1 to 2 years, it has been consistently reported that the two new models would be replacements for the LS and probably the Continental. There are rumors that the current Town Car will continue production in St. Thomas, Canada where it's structural twins the Crown Vic and Grand Marquis are currently built. So there is a mess of "what-ifs" going around. I think the general belief has been that the current Town Car would continue as it is, which would explain why the ideal of a Continental would arise, to fit between the LS replacement and an aging Town Car.
At closer look of the specifications, this MKS showcar is actually just a couple inches longer than the current FiveHundred in both wheelbase and overall length, so that would make good sense that this is the larger of the two cars, and not the smaller of the two as has been reported. The MKS is almost certainly the replacement for the Continental or Town Car, which one I do not think any can really answer with accuracy just yet. However, this platform will still very likely be the basis for the shorter sedan that will replace the LS too.
So like I mentioned, I think we are both right. This is the flagship model, but there will be an LS based off of it.
#31
Shelby GT500 Member
Join Date: September 2, 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by TomServo92@January 10, 2006, 3:01 PM
Before this gets out of hand, I wanted to stop and reason this thing out. So let's review the facts. The MKS has the same wheelbase as the LS (114") yet it is 9.4" longers. So the questions is this: where is the extra length? Well, it can't be in the cabin area since that sits between the wheels. Therefore, it must be in the front and rear overhangs. Only in the rear overhang does that translate into more space (trunk) but based on the photos, it appears that the MKS has less rear overhang than the LS. So the additionaly inches must be in the front which is of little use to the occupants. Now, like was said earlier, the interior space could be optimized. While this is true, you still only have 114" of space between the wheels to work with and if memory serves, the LS was a pretty roomy car. So without any real data on interior volume I would have to guess there isn't that much more room in the MKS vs. LS. So, in review, you have a car that is longer than the LS yet most probably isn't that larger from an interior standpoint. We also know the wheelbase is shorter than other larger sedans (A8). So, IMO the MKS is more than likely not much larger than the LS from an interior standpoint (and certainly not as large as the TC) but is longer in overall length. Of course, interior volume is what determines if a car is mid- vs full-size not overall length so it's possible the MKS crosses the threshold into the full-size segment based upon more optimized interior space.
Before this gets out of hand, I wanted to stop and reason this thing out. So let's review the facts. The MKS has the same wheelbase as the LS (114") yet it is 9.4" longers. So the questions is this: where is the extra length? Well, it can't be in the cabin area since that sits between the wheels. Therefore, it must be in the front and rear overhangs. Only in the rear overhang does that translate into more space (trunk) but based on the photos, it appears that the MKS has less rear overhang than the LS. So the additionaly inches must be in the front which is of little use to the occupants. Now, like was said earlier, the interior space could be optimized. While this is true, you still only have 114" of space between the wheels to work with and if memory serves, the LS was a pretty roomy car. So without any real data on interior volume I would have to guess there isn't that much more room in the MKS vs. LS. So, in review, you have a car that is longer than the LS yet most probably isn't that larger from an interior standpoint. We also know the wheelbase is shorter than other larger sedans (A8). So, IMO the MKS is more than likely not much larger than the LS from an interior standpoint (and certainly not as large as the TC) but is longer in overall length. Of course, interior volume is what determines if a car is mid- vs full-size not overall length so it's possible the MKS crosses the threshold into the full-size segment based upon more optimized interior space.
#32
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
Originally posted by max2000jp@January 10, 2006, 3:15 PM
Good analysis, but you are basing interior room strictly on wheelbase. There are other factors that limit interior volume. You are leaving out engine layout, which is a huge factor in interior size. The pics make it look like it has ample interior room. Like Kenny stated above, this may well be the a new "Continental" and a larger Town Car replacement will be developed alongside the MKS.
Good analysis, but you are basing interior room strictly on wheelbase. There are other factors that limit interior volume. You are leaving out engine layout, which is a huge factor in interior size. The pics make it look like it has ample interior room. Like Kenny stated above, this may well be the a new "Continental" and a larger Town Car replacement will be developed alongside the MKS.
Either way, it's an excellent concept for Lincoln and hopefully is sign of good things to come!
#34
Shelby GT500 Member
Join Date: September 2, 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by TomServo92@January 10, 2006, 3:22 PM
That's kind of where I was going with the last statement although I didn't explicitly mention engine layout as a contributor to the "optimized" interior space.
Either way, it's an excellent concept for Lincoln and hopefully is sign of good things to come!
That's kind of where I was going with the last statement although I didn't explicitly mention engine layout as a contributor to the "optimized" interior space.
Either way, it's an excellent concept for Lincoln and hopefully is sign of good things to come!
#35
Mach 1 Member
I got this link of the reveal in an e-mail today from lincoln:
http://www.lincoln.com/reachhigher/default...alHome_20060109
Also, If you click on MKS at the bottom, it shows some more pics.
http://www.lincoln.com/reachhigher/default...alHome_20060109
Also, If you click on MKS at the bottom, it shows some more pics.
#36
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
Originally posted by f1-cobra@January 10, 2006, 4:30 PM
I got this link of the reveal in an e-mail today from lincoln:
http://www.lincoln.com/reachhigher/default...alHome_20060109
Also, If you click on MKS at the bottom, it shows some more pics.
I got this link of the reveal in an e-mail today from lincoln:
http://www.lincoln.com/reachhigher/default...alHome_20060109
Also, If you click on MKS at the bottom, it shows some more pics.
#37
Cobra Member
Join Date: June 25, 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I only have 1 or 2 more Mustangs left in me. I plan on keeping my next Stang ( SE or Shelby ) for a very long time. So this MKS really has me interested in the future of Lincoln. I am getting to that age where I want all the goodies and power too! If this MKS has 315hp and is AWD? I am sold!
#38
The car that Ford should have built was the Continental concept from a couple years ago.
The MKS doesn't do it for me, it looks like a cross between a Maximua and an Acura TL, that is Japanese generic design.
While large @ 203" long (just barely longer than a Challenger) the MKS is tiny when compared to a Town Car, which is 214" long.
Looks like I'll be keeping my Lincoln LS for a few more years.
The MKS doesn't do it for me, it looks like a cross between a Maximua and an Acura TL, that is Japanese generic design.
While large @ 203" long (just barely longer than a Challenger) the MKS is tiny when compared to a Town Car, which is 214" long.
Looks like I'll be keeping my Lincoln LS for a few more years.
#39
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The continental was ok but like the MK.9 just not developed enough nor particularlly thrilling to anyone not a fan of the 60s. If Linc is going to survive it has to break out of the old man's car company persona and build cars that BMW/Mercedes/Lexus owners would give consideration to. That's where the MKS is aimed. I think we'll see another large, conservatively-styled TC-sized vehicle before it's had its run, just to keep the Vegas cab companies and mob-wannabies happy, but mainstream Lincoln's gonna head down the Chris Bangle road from here.
#40
Originally posted by GTJOHN@January 11, 2006, 4:21 PM
If this MKS has 315hp and is AWD? I am sold!
If this MKS has 315hp and is AWD? I am sold!
A very nice package I think.