Ford Discussions Non-Mustang Ford Products

At Least FORD Understands....

Old Nov 13, 2008 | 07:00 AM
  #1  
FLAstangx3's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: September 16, 2005
Posts: 1,705
Likes: 2
From: Yatta-Abba, AL
Thumbs up At Least FORD Understands....

From today's Detriot News Press:

http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll...811130413/1148
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 08:44 AM
  #2  
Evil_Capri's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,160
Likes: 73
Moving to 'Other Fords' section . . . but will leave a link for a couple days.

My favorite part of the article.

Global product development chief Derrick Kuzak -- backed by Mulally -- countered: If Ford has a future, it depends on delivering a new generation of class-leading cars and trucks that people actually want to buy. They fought off every challenge to one of the most ambitious product plans ever put together, albeit at the cost of thousands of jobs.

We're only going to be in business if we create products that people really do want and value," Mulally told The Detroit News in an exclusive interview Tuesday. "This is the essence of creating a viable Ford."
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 09:09 AM
  #3  
TomServo92's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 34
From: Conroe, TX
Originally Posted by Evil_Capri
Moving to 'Other Fords' section . . . but will leave a link for a couple days.

My favorite part of the article.
Remember all of the opposition to Mulally because he wasn't part of the Detroit establishment? Now, he's the right leader at the right time and Bill Ford's gamble on him is paying off.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 10:25 AM
  #4  
MBK's Avatar
MBK
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 31, 2008
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Bill Ford is a good guy; i think he understands what needs to be done. i hope the UAW gets out of the guy's hair
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 08:45 PM
  #5  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally Posted by TomServo92
Remember all of the opposition to Mulally because he wasn't part of the Detroit establishment? Now, he's the right leader at the right time and Bill Ford's gamble on him is paying off.
Exactly. And yet clearly some of the old guard remain >> "With gasoline prices falling, some argued that Ford should abandon its costly plan to retool North American truck factories to produce smaller, more fuel-efficient cars from Europe."

Perhaps those individuals should be shown the door? Another way to save money.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 09:20 PM
  #6  
TomServo92's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 34
From: Conroe, TX
Originally Posted by Hollywood_North GT
Exactly. And yet clearly some of the old guard remain >> "With gasoline prices falling, some argued that Ford should abandon its costly plan to retool North American truck factories to produce smaller, more fuel-efficient cars from Europe."

Perhaps those individuals should be shown the door? Another way to save money.
I suspect that discussion had to happen if only to discount it. I don't imagine Mulally will let it go any further or what you stated will happen.

Last edited by TomServo92; Nov 13, 2008 at 09:23 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 09:20 PM
  #7  
SuperSugeKnight's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 29, 2007
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Hollywood_North GT
Exactly. And yet clearly some of the old guard remain >> "With gasoline prices falling, some argued that Ford should abandon its costly plan to retool North American truck factories to produce smaller, more fuel-efficient cars from Europe."

Perhaps those individuals should be shown the door? Another way to save money.
I agree they should be shown the door. Most likely gas prices will be much higher this time next year.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 09:38 PM
  #8  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
Ford should invest in smaller cars, but they also should keep their truck and SUV lineup. I don't wanna see Explorer and Expedition go away.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 09:48 PM
  #9  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally Posted by Red Star
Ford should invest in smaller cars, but they also should keep their truck and SUV lineup. I don't wanna see Explorer and Expedition go away.
Who the hell is buying Expeditions in this marketplace?

Kill that dinosaur already.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 09:54 PM
  #10  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
Expedition is currently outselling Taurus. Does that mean that Ford should kill Taurus too?

Expedition also outsold every Mercury, Lincoln and Volvo in 2008.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 10:13 PM
  #11  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally Posted by Red Star
Expedition is currently outselling Taurus. Does that mean that Ford should kill Taurus too?
Well, beating the current Taurus is like beating a one-legged man with a tricycle. All that proves is that the Taurus has been an abominable failure.

Originally Posted by Red Star
Expedition also outsold every Mercury, Lincoln and Volvo in 2008.
Singly...or collectively?

Meanwhile, let's see those numbers.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 10:39 PM
  #12  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
http://www.blueovalnews.com/index.ph..._articleid=694

What I'm trying to say is that bigger SUVs might become popular again and it would suck if Ford have to spend money for development of new SUV just because they killed Expedition (and/or Explorer) now.
Reply
Old Nov 13, 2008 | 11:15 PM
  #13  
GT40 2's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: February 1, 2004
Posts: 940
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by Red Star
Ford should invest in smaller cars, but they also should keep their truck and SUV lineup. I don't wanna see Explorer and Expedition go away.


Fords already killing the Explorer by turning it into a crossover.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2008 | 12:32 AM
  #14  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally Posted by Red Star
What I'm trying to say is that bigger SUVs might become popular again.
That's a bad strategy.

If you scrutinize the numbers you provided, you will see that compared to the smaller offerings in Ford's passenger car lineup like the Fusion and Focus, while all sales are down, Expedition sales are down about three times as much, amidst a downwards trend for all the truck/CUV/SUV vehicles. Ford needs to be paring those behemoths, not keeping them around anymore in a worsening economy.
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2008 | 06:22 AM
  #15  
05fordgt's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: June 19, 2004
Posts: 6,840
Likes: 2
From: Phoenixville, PA
Originally Posted by Red Star
http://www.blueovalnews.com/index.ph..._articleid=694

What I'm trying to say is that bigger SUVs might become popular again and it would suck if Ford have to spend money for development of new SUV just because they killed Expedition (and/or Explorer) now.
Thats an interesting list of cars sold Zoran. But its skewed a little bit, in terms of percentages and here is why? The Freestar is still listed, and they haven't made that vehicle in a few years. And the Ford GT is still listed, and that stopped production Sept 2006. No kidding that those cars will have a HUGE negative loss in sales this year compared to last year. They should have used CURRENTLY produced cars in the grid. And why is there no numbers for the 2007 year for Edge. That vehicle came out in the winter of 2006, as a 2007 model!
Reply
Old Nov 14, 2008 | 04:30 PM
  #16  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
I think you're looking at the wrong column. There are 2007 numbers for Edge, but not for Flex.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mark0006
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
15
Sep 8, 2023 09:46 AM
Diode Dynamics
Vendor Showcase
3
Jun 12, 2018 03:26 PM
jc46002003
Repair and Service Help
70
Apr 15, 2016 03:00 PM
JonathonK
GT350
6
Sep 17, 2015 10:13 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:01 AM.