Ford Discussions Non-Mustang Ford Products

Ford Ranger owners turning to competition

Old Aug 20, 2012 | 01:19 PM
  #1  
Zastava_101's Avatar
Thread Starter
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
Ford Ranger owners turning to competition

Now that the U.S.-spec Ford Ranger has been discontinued, many owners of the small pickup are leaving the automaker for midsize entries like the Toyota Tacoma and Nissan Frontier, The Detroit News reports. Ford hoped Ranger owners would turn to the larger F-150 to replace their Rangers, but it appears many are looking elsewhere.
While truck buyers who don’t want a full-size pickup can choose among the Toyota Tacoma, Nissan Frontier, and leftover Chevrolet Colorados, not all Ranger owners are abandoning Ford. Some who don’t turn to the F-150 are driving away from Ford dealerships in an Escape crossover and compact Focus, the report says, which could be due to the automaker offering Ranger owners big incentives to stick with the brand.
Ford decided to discontinue the Ranger pickup after sales of compact pickups shrunk to just 2 percent of the overall American automotive market. Between 1983 and last December when the last truck rolled off the assembly line, Ford built 6.6 million Rangers. While Ford sells a Ranger-badged midsize truck overseas, we don’t expect to see that truck – or Volkswagen’s similarly sized Amarok truck – here.
While high incentives and improving mileage make it easier for some midsize truck buyers to consider a full-size truck, some Ranger owners no doubt prefer the pickup’s compact size, which makes it more maneuverable than the larger F-150. For comparison a Ford Ranger SuperCab is 203.6 inches long compared to the 231.9-inch long F-150 SuperCab. A Toyota Tacoma Access Cab is 208.1 inches long while the Nissan Frontier King Cab is 205.5 inches long.


http://wot.motortrend.com/report-for...#ixzz247EjnmO5


Reply
Old Aug 20, 2012 | 01:25 PM
  #2  
texastboneking's Avatar
Bear Eats King...
Bear ****s Bone
 
Joined: September 5, 2011
Posts: 5,473
Likes: 2
From: Cleburne, Tx
rangers are good little trucks...
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2012 | 01:33 PM
  #3  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by Zastava_101
sales of compact pickups shrunk to just 2 percent of the overall American automotive market.
Aren't you the one always talking about the importance of market share in a company's decision process?

Personally, the Ranger didn't have good enough mileage for me to accept the small bed.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2012 | 02:01 PM
  #4  
Flagstang's Avatar
Spam Connoisseur
I got هَبوب‎ed
 
Joined: September 8, 2009
Posts: 9,651
Likes: 7
From: Sun City AZ
rangers have been over priced for many many years. but has bone said they are great little trucks.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2012 | 02:18 PM
  #5  
Zastava_101's Avatar
Thread Starter
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
Originally Posted by cdynaco
Aren't you the one always talking about the importance of market share in a company's decision process?
Have I ever criticized Ford for killing the Ranger?
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2012 | 06:22 PM
  #6  
postalworker's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: March 21, 2007
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
From: western mass
I am on my 3rd Ranger (2003) and wish they would have kept it going.
It would have been great to be able to get one with the new 3.7 instead
of the hog 4.0. I would have bought that combo in a heartbeat (hoofbeat ?)
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2012 | 03:47 PM
  #7  
rhumb's Avatar
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
From: DMV
I think Ford fell back to some old school Detroit Big-three thinking that Americans just want simple size/quantity and that Ranger buyers were little more than poor, frustrated F Series wannabuyers if they could chop the price enough.

However, perhaps the truth lies closer to being that Americans are indeed a bit more discerning than simply weighing the worth of their vehicle on a lb/$ scale but rather, include a high qualitative quotient too. In that light, the stolid little Ranger was seen for basically what it was, a stolid but very dated truck and that given the option of a high quality, up-to-date design would be quite happy to by such a smallish pickup rather than a decontented big F-Series.

Sometimes, a smaller package is an advantage in and of itself, especially to more urban buyers or those who simply don't like the inherent bulk, girth, clumsiness and thirst of a big, heavy full sized truck and don't need to haul three tons of lead ingots or tow dead M1 tanks back to their garage.

I guess vestiges of this old-Detroit bigger-is-better mantra still echoes in a few corners, even in Ford.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PonyShow
V6
8
Nov 17, 2017 02:00 PM
ustabawannab
5.0L GT Modifications
10
May 3, 2016 07:54 AM
SpeedyJoe
Suspension, Brakes, and Tire Tech
18
Aug 23, 2015 02:42 PM
PonyShow
Introductions
19
Aug 21, 2015 09:55 AM
roushcollection
Auto Shows and Events
0
Jul 28, 2015 02:08 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:29 AM.