Ford Discussions Non-Mustang Ford Products

2011 Excursion ... should Ford build it?

Old Jan 27, 2011 | 08:54 PM
  #1  
Zastava_101's Avatar
Thread Starter
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
2011 Excursion ... should Ford build it?

http://www.autoblog.com/2011/01/24/f...el-right-here/

The clever craftsmen at Custom Autos by Tim can turn any 2010 or 2011 Ford F-250 or F-350 into what looks to be a factory-perfect interpretation of what the Excursion would look like if it hadn't been axed in 2005. Buyers can get their behemoths with either four or six doors and it usually takes Tim's crew around six weeks to turn a vehicle from a pickup to an SUV. In that time, the shop finds a 2005 Excursion from the southwest, drags it to their shop in Guthrie, Oklahoma and surgically removes the rear-end of the vehicle.


Reply
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 08:55 PM
  #2  
2k7gtcs's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,808
Likes: 163
Sometimes I really love this country more than words could ever say.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2011 | 09:14 PM
  #3  
05GT-O.C.D.'s Avatar
I lust for a M24
 
Joined: November 6, 2004
Posts: 7,042
Likes: 4
From: Football HOF, Canton OH
That's just cool.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2011 | 07:46 AM
  #4  
Scothew's Avatar
Stubborn Bear
TMS Staff
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 22,692
Likes: 48
I think Ford should build them no doubt.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2011 | 08:18 AM
  #5  
Automagically's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: April 20, 2010
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 3
From: Dallas
If there is a market for them then yes, otherwise, no.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2011 | 09:24 AM
  #6  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
I get so many people that come in wanting excursions, Ford should build it again.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2011 | 09:50 AM
  #7  
Automagically's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: April 20, 2010
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 3
From: Dallas
Originally Posted by Knight
I get so many people that come in wanting excursions, Ford should build it again.
Horse ranchers with 6 kids? Ok. I could see that.

Sorry, even though I come from the land of Pickup trucks I just don't jump on the SUV band wagon easily unless someone has a lot of utility you need to utilize. But if, like I said, there is a need or high amount of want warranted, I am not against. I think the Excursion is sweet, especially when up armored and has a GAU-19 attached.

Last edited by Automagically; Jan 28, 2011 at 09:53 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2011 | 10:09 AM
  #8  
05GT-O.C.D.'s Avatar
I lust for a M24
 
Joined: November 6, 2004
Posts: 7,042
Likes: 4
From: Football HOF, Canton OH
Math lesson for the day:

44 gallon tank x $3.25/gallon =
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2011 | 10:36 AM
  #9  
burningman's Avatar
Bow Chica Bow Wow
TMS Staff
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 7,446
Likes: 12
From: Proudly in NJ...bite it FL
While I applaud the outstanding work this chap is doing ..personally I'm tired of Excursions and suburbans.
I lived in FL for 7 years and everytime I saw one of these behemoths it wa drivin by a woman that had ZERO passengers. In fact most SUV's I saw were the same situation.
but each to his own I guess.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2011 | 11:42 AM
  #10  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
Originally Posted by Automagically
Horse ranchers with 6 kids? Ok. I could see that.

Sorry, even though I come from the land of Pickup trucks I just don't jump on the SUV band wagon easily unless someone has a lot of utility you need to utilize. But if, like I said, there is a need or high amount of want warranted, I am not against. I think the Excursion is sweet, especially when up armored and has a GAU-19 attached.
I do live in a pretty rural area for being near Chicago. Everyone around here tows somthing, be it a large boat, horse trailer, racecar.

Atleast you could get a deisel, you'd get better fuel economy then the expedition.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2011 | 06:47 PM
  #11  
hi5.0's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 15, 2005
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
Originally Posted by burningman
While I applaud the outstanding work this chap is doing ..personally I'm tired of Excursions and suburbans.
I lived in FL for 7 years and everytime I saw one of these behemoths it wa drivin by a woman that had ZERO passengers. In fact most SUV's I saw were the same situation.
but each to his own I guess.
Kind of similar here - big vehicle with a single occupant (driver relatively small in stature) primarily driven in a urban setting. Then again, these and the full size pickups are like the (Pacific) islanders' family car. Can't stand seeing vehicles like this being used just like a car - heck, most of them are cleaner underneath than the top of my car.

Last edited by hi5.0; Jan 28, 2011 at 06:48 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2011 | 07:47 PM
  #12  
Zastava_101's Avatar
Thread Starter
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
I don't think fuel economy is that bad ... not any worse than Super Duty or Expedition anyway.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2011 | 08:21 PM
  #13  
2k7gtcs's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,808
Likes: 163
They should be able to make it for fleet use and sell a few to those willing to buy them.

I could use one and would like the diesel option.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2011 | 11:53 PM
  #14  
jacostang's Avatar
 
Joined: January 27, 2006
Posts: 3,613
Likes: 7
From: Mesa, AZ
Big, Bad and Beautiful!
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2011 | 12:42 PM
  #15  
mustang_sallad's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: March 18, 2004
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
i still remember the day i first heard of the notion of an SUV "behemoth" that would be even bigger than the Suburban... I think it was an issue of Popular Science that had a 5 year product road map table for a bunch of different companies. Now it has come and gone, and while the thing always excited me and I thought it looked cool, I question how many people really needed something like that, and I guess Ford did too. If there was a profitable market for something like that, I'm sure Ford would build it, but it's not hard to imagine how there's a lack of business case for these things, with fuel prices only going higher. If you can't replace an Excursion with either a Flex or a super crew F350, you should probably try to adapt, cause I don't see a company adjusting their product portfolio for such a small minority of the market.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2011 | 01:36 PM
  #16  
Moosetang's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
IIRC, aside from the Fuel Economy impact of the Excursion Ford found that most people who bought Excursions bought it for towing, which meant they were actually Super Duty customers. They decided the the extra seating and covered cargo space wasn't contributing enough to sales to make it worth it, especially with the Expedition already there.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2011 | 11:03 AM
  #17  
Scothew's Avatar
Stubborn Bear
TMS Staff
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 22,692
Likes: 48
Originally Posted by 2k7gtcs
They should be able to make it for fleet use and sell a few to those willing to buy them.

I could use one and would like the diesel option.
My exact thoughts. Diesel option, and only sold as a fleet vehicle. Contractors and other crew type outfits would go for this in a heart beat.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2011 | 12:11 PM
  #18  
rhumb's Avatar
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
From: DMV
Originally Posted by burningman
While I applaud the outstanding work this chap is doing ..personally I'm tired of Excursions and suburbans.
I lived in FL for 7 years and everytime I saw one of these behemoths it wa drivin by a woman that had ZERO passengers. In fact most SUV's I saw were the same situation.
but each to his own I guess.
Normally I'm right with you on this, being that 97% of big SUVs are more urban fashion statements or monuments to conspicuous consumption as noted above.

That said, they guy I sailboat race with has one and it is the perfect, practical and pragmatic beast of burden for dragging 30 feet of full keel racing boat 1,200 miles down to Key West every year loaded with two weeks of gear and stuff. The old 7.3 PowerStroke does an admirable job of rattling down I95 dragging along a couple tons of extra mass, but I can't imagine what one of the new 800ft/lb diesels would do.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2011 | 01:42 PM
  #19  
Moosetang's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by rhumb
Normally I'm right with you on this, being that 97% of big SUVs are more urban fashion statements or monuments to conspicuous consumption as noted above.

That said, they guy I sailboat race with has one and it is the perfect, practical and pragmatic beast of burden for dragging 30 feet of full keel racing boat 1,200 miles down to Key West every year loaded with two weeks of gear and stuff. The old 7.3 PowerStroke does an admirable job of rattling down I95 dragging along a couple tons of extra mass, but I can't imagine what one of the new 800ft/lb diesels would do.
But does he need the extra seating of the Excursion or would a Super Duty with a bed cover do the job just as well?
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2011 | 02:16 PM
  #20  
Grell's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 14, 2008
Posts: 327
Likes: 0
From: South West Wisconsin
by all means yes Ford should build this and it should ONLY have the Diesel Option. I have rode in older excursions that were diesels that got great mileage. Gas ones, well not so good. It is like the H2 Hummer, A person swapped in a diesel in it and got 22 mpg. Better then 6 mpg gas
But we have to get rid of this urea crap. This stuff is not good and it is just one more thing for people to spend money on. As far as being better for the enviorment? Dont buy into the lies!
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:22 PM.