2010 Fusion Interior
#3
Shelby GT350 Member
Wow not much changed... Except something that looks like a giant boob tube like the Buick Reatta used to have... The whole center stack looks inspired by a 1970's portable television...
#5
Bullitt Member
Join Date: February 17, 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I definitely think it looks better......and as far as inspiration, I think that they went to Lexus for that.
http://www.caradvice.com.au/wp-conte...SFInterior.jpg
http://www.caradvice.com.au/wp-conte...SFInterior.jpg
#6
Needs to be more Astony
I can see the reviews already, they will say the car is great, and then say, the ergonics are all wrong, the buttons are too low on the center stack...so the car is 4th place in our 4 car comparison.
#7
They have GOT to do something about those gaps on the upper storage bay. I have no idea what the f the deal is with Ford with this stuff. On the Lincoln, they are perfect on the interior bits. WTF, a computer makes a mold for a plastic part that snaps into another one. The tolerances are engineered in, its not a matter of production cost. Two pieces of plastic and soft touch buttons fit perfectly on a $25 boost phone. And the dash/console gap is stupid, why not just emulate the junction that is in the flex??? Again, its all plastic and CAD programs, not some insurmountable task....Flow the stack into the console and move the shifter 1" back, viola! I'm a friggin genius. The gaps around the parts are absurd.
Last edited by kevinb120; 6/12/08 at 04:07 PM.
#9
Legacy TMS Member Pr
looks like a dated Toyota or Nissan interior.
#10
Bullitt Member
Join Date: November 22, 2005
Location: Brea, CA
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
me likes the bigger nav screen, but im comparing pics of the current fusion front stack to this one and not much has changed! perhaps this is not the actual production interior!???
#12
Team Mustang Source
Join Date: June 19, 2004
Location: Phoenixville, PA
Posts: 6,840
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
They have GOT to do something about those gaps on the upper storage bay. I have no idea what the f the deal is with Ford with this stuff. On the Lincoln, they are perfect on the interior bits. WTF, a computer makes a mold for a plastic part that snaps into another one. The tolerances are engineered in, its not a matter of production cost. Two pieces of plastic and soft touch buttons fit perfectly on a $25 boost phone. And the dash/console gap is stupid, why not just emulate the junction that is in the flex??? Again, its all plastic and CAD programs, not some insurmountable task....Flow the stack into the console and move the shifter 1" back, viola! I'm a friggin genius. The gaps around the parts are absurd.
#13
Legacy TMS Member
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post