Would you have purchased a FR 500?
Would you have purchased a FR 500?
Let's just say for sake of argument that Ford would have produced the 1999 FR 500 for the approximate same cost as a 2003-2004 Cobra . . . would you have bought one?
The FR 500 made its appearance at the SEMA show in 1999. The car featured a 5.0L V-8 pushing 415-hp and 365 lb.-ft. of torque.

http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/concept/fr500/
I think I would have purchased one instead of the Mach IF Ford would have manufactured it. What say you?
The FR 500 made its appearance at the SEMA show in 1999. The car featured a 5.0L V-8 pushing 415-hp and 365 lb.-ft. of torque.

http://bradbarnett.net/mustangs/concept/fr500/
I think I would have purchased one instead of the Mach IF Ford would have manufactured it. What say you?
That's hard to say. If you gave me the choice right now, I'd take the cobra, hands down. Even though it was rated at 390 hp, it made over 415 anyway. It's a great performer and an awesome looking car.
But at the time this debuted, the cobra was only making a little over 300 hp, so a 415 hp engine would have been pretty tempting. I still dont like its looks entirely, but I could've gotten over that with the power it had.
By the way, was the 5.0 in it a pushrod holdover, or was it an enlarged modular engine like the modern Cammer 5.0?
But at the time this debuted, the cobra was only making a little over 300 hp, so a 415 hp engine would have been pretty tempting. I still dont like its looks entirely, but I could've gotten over that with the power it had.
By the way, was the 5.0 in it a pushrod holdover, or was it an enlarged modular engine like the modern Cammer 5.0?
Originally Posted by mudshuvel319
That's hard to say. If you gave me the choice right now, I'd take the cobra, hands down. Even though it was rated at 390 hp, it made over 415 anyway. It's a great performer and an awesome looking car.
But at the time this debuted, the cobra was only making a little over 300 hp, so a 415 hp engine would have been pretty tempting. I still dont like its looks entirely, but I could've gotten over that with the power it had.
By the way, was the 5.0 in it a pushrod holdover, or was it an enlarged modular engine like the modern Cammer 5.0?
But at the time this debuted, the cobra was only making a little over 300 hp, so a 415 hp engine would have been pretty tempting. I still dont like its looks entirely, but I could've gotten over that with the power it had.
By the way, was the 5.0 in it a pushrod holdover, or was it an enlarged modular engine like the modern Cammer 5.0?
I honestly would have gone the FR500. You had the seats, the glorious motor, nicer suspension, looks, wheels, etc etc etc..... I am not thrilled about the front end, but like anything else, that can be changed to suit your fancy 
The FR500 was the first car to receive the Cammer motor. THe heads, intake and cams are available through FRPP for current 4v owners.

The FR500 was the first car to receive the Cammer motor. THe heads, intake and cams are available through FRPP for current 4v owners.
I though they did offer the body kit, although you had to move the front suspension forward a few inches (5 or 6, I don't remember). I didn't even have a Mustang at the time, but I would've gone for it just for the suspension and engine. The front end definitely needs to be replaced though.
The FR500 was built in Silver and White. The super stallion was awesome, but I dont know how feasible it could have been as a street/daily driven car. The FR500 could easily pull double duty as a racer and DD.
yea i would buy a FR500 over the cobra anyday and their were 3 FR500 made and sold for $79000 if i get enough out of my 240SX i might buy a 2002 and throw in a Ford GT motor...i can't remember who sold that block....if i cant afford that i might throw in a DOHC 4.6 Cobra Motor out of a 03 or 04 cobra....



