SN95 Mustang 1994-2004 Mustangs Member Tech & Restoration Discussion

Turbocharger or Supercharger

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11/14/13, 08:34 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
10styx10's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 14, 2013
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Turbocharger or Supercharger

Which one is overall better?

And which one would be better for my 03 Mustang GT?

Everyone tells me turbo but im concerned about heat and maintenance, along with turbo lag.
Old 1/18/14, 08:28 AM
  #2  
V6 Member
 
Sjnagy's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 20, 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it as whatever you like overall. Superchargers use up around 5 hp of the what you are producing to turn up the supercharger. A turbo however runs hot from the exhaust so you have to cool it somehow so if you think about it it adds weight to cool it and you have too spool up the turbo for power versus instant power from a supercharger.

So it's whatever you like.
Old 1/18/14, 08:41 AM
  #3  
GT Member
 
exchallenger's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 26, 2011
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Two entirely different animals. A turbocharger will deliver a great power punch once it spools up (goes to positive pressure,) and starts forcing air instead of sucking it into the engine. Plus a turbocharger doesn't hurt fuel economy.
A supercharger doesn't spool up, it's always on as it's driven by a belt, so the power punch is always available. No waiting, and that's absolutely critical. There is a significant fuel economy price to be paid with a supercharger but you don't get something for nothing in the car world. More of this means less of that.
As for modifying an 03, I think I'd just buy an '11 or later and get just as much power from the factory as going to all the expense and trouble of turbo or supercharger.
Old 1/21/14, 09:36 AM
  #4  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
This biggest pro to a supercharger setup is compact layout and the aforementioned lack of under hood heat issues. The cost is in parasitic drag which can consume a lot of power when your talking big boost and lots of blower RPM. The most efficient blower design is a twin screw and they are also the most adiabatic efficient forced induction device out there.

On a roots or screw type supercharger the hit in fuel mileage can be worse compared to a centrifugal type since you creep up on boost earlier demanding more fuel but if you like a fat power curve they are great. I've messed around with cars using a centri with more total power and despite having about 150 less peak power I could keep up nicely until they started turn some serious RPM.
Old 1/21/14, 09:41 PM
  #5  
2013 RR Boss 302 #2342
 
Mustang Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 6, 2012
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 11,658
Likes: 0
Received 2,171 Likes on 1,619 Posts
Dang Bob I had to look this word up! Adiabatic
Old 3/20/14, 09:39 AM
  #6  
V6 Member
 
dilabop's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 29, 2013
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If I had the money I would go with a turbo. You an make a lot more power
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Road_Runner
5.0L GT Modifications
64
7/21/16 09:14 AM
robjh22
Car Care
20
12/14/15 08:41 AM
JonathonK
2005-2009 Mustang
2
9/19/15 03:19 AM
MustangGTCS13
2010-2014 Mustang
9
9/17/15 07:38 AM



Quick Reply: Turbocharger or Supercharger



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:43 PM.