05-09 Interior and Audio Mods Enhancing Your Mustang's Interior and Sound System

Shaker Pinout

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 10:01 AM
  #1  
Zig-Zag's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 17, 2005
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: Kelowna, BC, CANADA
Long time listener, first time poster...

I found this diagram on some (unnamed) Mustang forum, and seeing as so many have expressed a desire to enable the Shaker's AUX input, I thought it might be well received here.

Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 10:17 AM
  #2  
SurfnSoCal's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 2,121
Likes: 0
From: San Clemente, CA
sweet! thanks man!
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 10:20 AM
  #3  
DozerzPony's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 19, 2004
Posts: 667
Likes: 0
Yeah, Thanks. I am thinking of tweeking the system. You ROCK!!!
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 11:49 AM
  #4  
Berol's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: May 30, 2004
Posts: 386
Likes: 0
Which Shaker? Or doesn't it matter?
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 11:55 AM
  #5  
Altoid's Avatar
Jackass
 
Joined: August 24, 2004
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
I would think the head units for both systems are the same. Other then one has "shaker 500/1000" written on them. As the only thing that differs is the amp and the subs in the trunk.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 12:00 PM
  #6  
SixtySix's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,153
Likes: 0
Actually this confirms my suspicions that just because it's a diffrerent name, doesn't mean it's a new deck. It's the same ole deck as the Mach 460, the difference is MP3 capability. If you want to enable the AUX just buy an adapter for a 2003-2004 Mach System and you should be all set. OR just buy the part# annotated on J4 and roll your own.

SWEET
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 12:04 PM
  #7  
67fastback428's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: September 28, 2004
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
I seen this on the other sight too. So, where would you add an input, connector J3, wires 1 & 2 for left speaker, and 9 & 10 for the right ? anyone know for sure???
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 12:07 PM
  #8  
67fastback428's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: September 28, 2004
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Originally posted by SixtySix@January 17, 2005, 1:03 PM
Actually this confirms my suspicions that just because it's a diffrerent name, doesn't mean it's a new deck. It's the same ole deck as the Mach 460, the difference is MP3 capability. If you want to enable the AUX just buy an adapter for a 2003-2004 Mach System and you should be all set. OR just buy the part# annotated on J4 and roll your own.

SWEET
That is what I was looking fo , thanks.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 12:13 PM
  #9  
adrenalin's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: May 26, 2004
Posts: 10,605
Likes: 2
Welcome to the forum CAM.

In regards to some thinking that the shaker 500/1000 are the same head unit I disagree. The shaker 1000 headunit has a few features (such as shaker on/off) to control the extra amps and subs. Then again it could just be a remote signal. Won't know for sure until I see the back of both models I guess
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 12:16 PM
  #10  
Altoid's Avatar
Jackass
 
Joined: August 24, 2004
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
Originally posted by adrenalin@January 17, 2005, 1:16 PM
Welcome to the forum CAM.

In regards to some thinking that the shaker 500/1000 are the same head unit I disagree. The shaker 1000 headunit has a few features (such as shaker on/off) to control the extra amps and subs. Then again it could just be a remote signal. Won't know for sure until I see the back of both models I guess
And if you want a personal car, you' But the backing should be the same. What do I know, I’m going aftermarket anyway.
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 12:25 PM
  #11  
SixtySix's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,153
Likes: 0
Originally posted by 67fastback428+January 17, 2005, 1:10 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (67fastback428 @ January 17, 2005, 1:10 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-SixtySix@January 17, 2005, 1:03 PM
Actually this confirms my suspicions that just because it's a diffrerent name, doesn't mean it's a new deck. It's the same ole deck as the Mach 460, the difference is MP3 capability. If you want to enable the AUX just buy an adapter for a 2003-2004 Mach System and you should be all set. OR just buy the part# annotated on J4 and roll your own.

SWEET
That is what I was looking fo , thanks. [/b][/quote]
It looks as though J4 is for the switch and the appropiate connections for audio are on J3, including mono for cellphone. I likey!

Great find
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 04:32 PM
  #12  
NBAworm's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: September 25, 2004
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Sixty Six - If you want to enable the AUX just buy an adapter for a 2003-2004 Mach System and you should be all set. OR just buy the part# annotated on J4 and roll your own.
So is this really the case, or is anyone willing to try this out? Just interested before I pull my stereo. Don't have anything to add to the AUX right now... but if I knew this worked, sat radio may not be far off.
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 04:58 PM
  #13  
Clem's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 2, 2005
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Yeah, I'm also looking to throw an XM tuner on this thing (I have the Shaker 1000) and avoid the FM Modulated route that I've gone with on my 2004 F150 with the XM Commander. My CD collection dates back to the 80's and the FM tuner on this thing just isn't cutting it.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 10:27 PM
  #14  
derynf's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 16, 2004
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
I missed the Pittsburg playoff game because of the FM Modulation. Driving through the SF bay area. All the GOD stations bled over the stations that my Sirius Obiter uses.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2005 | 10:32 PM
  #15  
derynf's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 16, 2004
Posts: 993
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Altoid@January 17, 2005, 10:58 AM
I would think the head units for both systems are the same. Other then one has "shaker 500/1000" written on them. As the only thing that differs is the amp and the subs in the trunk.

Any suggestions as to where?
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2005 | 08:48 AM
  #16  
subzero05's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 7, 2005
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
so who is going to belly up and get one of the 03-04 adapters and see if this works or not..really want to add SAT as well to the AUX feature
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 04:06 PM
  #17  
SVTF150's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: August 26, 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
can someone send me a copy of that shaker wiring diagram?

I can't seem to see it.

James
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 05:16 PM
  #18  
KB9KHM's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: July 3, 2005
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
I'd also like a copy of the wiring diagram ... if anybody has one.
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2005 | 08:28 AM
  #19  
Vallee's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2005
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Same here
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 09:41 PM
  #20  
gibb409's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: October 10, 2005
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Hey-

Newbie to the board. I can't seem to find the link Zig-Zag posted to the Shaker 500/1000 pinout. I'm installing the PIE FRD04-AUX adapter and I want to make sure where the constant 12-volt power supply lead is.

Could someone please re-post it?

Thanks!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
duppycat
General Mustang Chat
2
Feb 16, 2019 08:36 AM
scott6809
2010-2014 Mustang
25
Sep 12, 2015 11:44 PM
K.A.I.N
'10-14 Interior and Audio
2
Jul 20, 2015 06:42 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:14 AM.