Cervini's New Stalker Kit
#6
Bow Chica Bow Wow
TMS Staff
TMS Staff
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
the stalker series has always looked kinda bulky to me..this one follows that look..the nose is ok..the rollbar is to die for and I think is the only one a vert of the s197 style should ever have.
#13
Mach 1 Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Pass. Is it paying homage to a 1970 mustang, a 1971?!?! Or to a mid-90s body kit? Whatever it is, me no likely. Subtle is better than in your face and this is just screaming at you.
#17
Bullitt Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
I'd consider it, but I just have issues with having the word "Stalker" in big letters on my rear bumper. Am I the only one that thinks that could be interpreted as creepy?
#19
hood sucks. rear end sucks.
front fascia is decent. i like the side vents. i like the foglights in the lower grill. i might even consider buying it.
it looks like a bad saleen impersonation. who does Cervini's consult about their design? the hood is sooooo bad.
front fascia is decent. i like the side vents. i like the foglights in the lower grill. i might even consider buying it.
it looks like a bad saleen impersonation. who does Cervini's consult about their design? the hood is sooooo bad.