Some national title game...
1/4/05, 09:41 PM
#5
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: October 15, 2004
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
OU OU OU this isn't the team that shut out Texas. Bob Stoops is on heck of a coach, i'd say hes nearlu like Barry Switzer he hasnt been panicked yet, I question Chuck Long's playcalling, OU's secondary, and the teams confidence in itself. Next year will show what Stoops has, he has a basically new team next year...can't wait and I want to see Chuck Long gone. i feel for White he is the greates quarterback i've ever seen, I can't stand Leinart...anyway...tthere is a next year
BOOMER SOONER!!
BOOMER SOONER!!
1/5/05, 08:45 AM
#6
I'm people, and I like.
Join Date: March 13, 2004
Location: PDX
Posts: 9,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
USC just annihialated OU. there is no question now who is number 1 in the country. There were no excuses for OU, USC is just the better team
and their team next year should be even better... 16 of the 22 starters return!
and their team next year should be even better... 16 of the 22 starters return!
1/5/05, 12:05 PM
#8
Cobra Member
Join Date: July 29, 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by thezeppelin8@January 5, 2005, 7:48 AM
USC just annihialated OU. there is no question now who is number 1 in the country. There were no excuses for OU, USC is just the better team
and their team next year should be even better... 16 of the 22 starters return!
USC just annihialated OU. there is no question now who is number 1 in the country. There were no excuses for OU, USC is just the better team
and their team next year should be even better... 16 of the 22 starters return!
1/5/05, 02:04 PM
#9
I'm people, and I like.
Join Date: March 13, 2004
Location: PDX
Posts: 9,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by freebass55+January 5, 2005, 12:08 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (freebass55 @ January 5, 2005, 12:08 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-thezeppelin8@January 5, 2005, 7:48 AM
USC just annihialated OU. there is no question now who is number 1 in the country. There were no excuses for OU, USC is just the better team
and their team next year should be even better... 16 of the 22 starters return!
USC just annihialated OU. there is no question now who is number 1 in the country. There were no excuses for OU, USC is just the better team
and their team next year should be even better... 16 of the 22 starters return!
there is a greater chance of him leaving, especially since he already got an economics degree in 3 years... we'll see what happens. they did say he wanted to stay to have more fun
1/5/05, 02:51 PM
#10
Member
Join Date: January 5, 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How about a little love for the west coast, huh? I for one was glad to see USC not just play well, but dominate a team from the Big 12. Every year it's "The Pac-10 is a weak conference." We get no respect. Well at least USC proved otherwise finally. Obviously my Huskies were pretty pathetic this year, but overall I'd say it's tough to get through the Pac-10 undefeated. Way to go USC!
1/5/05, 05:27 PM
#11
I'm people, and I like.
Join Date: March 13, 2004
Location: PDX
Posts: 9,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by UWHuskies@January 5, 2005, 2:54 PM
How about a little love for the west coast, huh? I for one was glad to see USC not just play well, but dominate a team from the Big 12. Every year it's "The Pac-10 is a weak conference." We get no respect. Well at least USC proved otherwise finally. Obviously my Huskies were pretty pathetic this year, but overall I'd say it's tough to get through the Pac-10 undefeated. Way to go USC!
How about a little love for the west coast, huh? I for one was glad to see USC not just play well, but dominate a team from the Big 12. Every year it's "The Pac-10 is a weak conference." We get no respect. Well at least USC proved otherwise finally. Obviously my Huskies were pretty pathetic this year, but overall I'd say it's tough to get through the Pac-10 undefeated. Way to go USC!
... the west coast/pac-10 deserves some respect from ncaa football fans
1/5/05, 10:37 PM
#13
I'm people, and I like.
Join Date: March 13, 2004
Location: PDX
Posts: 9,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by will@January 5, 2005, 8:00 PM
The Pac 10 is a weak conference compared to others, but I must tip my hat to USC. It was a very very convincing win.. congrats guys!
The Pac 10 is a weak conference compared to others, but I must tip my hat to USC. It was a very very convincing win.. congrats guys!
they have 3 teams ranked in the top 20 at the end of the season... how is that weak?
1/6/05, 12:00 AM
#14
Post *****
Join Date: May 13, 2004
Location: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Posts: 18,613
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
2 Posts
dude i cant believe i missed yesterday's game. i was at the awards banquet for the football team. i got score updates from my friends with cfancy fones every 10 minutes. it sounded like a great game tho. oh, that one handed catch...and the dropped punt....priceless
1/6/05, 08:31 AM
#15
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: October 15, 2004
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
weren't thinking was the problem....mental errors...the Big 12 is tough but we never prove ourselves(except against Cal 
)...hopefully next year OU will do good, they wont be in the title game becuase White and 15 other seniors are gone
)...hopefully next year OU will do good, they wont be in the title game becuase White and 15 other seniors are gone
1/6/05, 08:35 AM
#16
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
Thread Starter
We need a playoff already, I still don't understand why they don't do it. It would bring in more money then the current setup. I guess it makes too much sense.
1/6/05, 08:53 AM
#17
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: October 15, 2004
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"analysts" said they need a few more years to work out the kinks, they don't want to drag a boring season on into February, but they want enough teams to make it fair, i dunno what'll happen
hard to have a perfect season, i say just have a playoff with the top so many teams..
hard to have a perfect season, i say just have a playoff with the top so many teams..
1/6/05, 10:32 AM
#18
Cobra Member
Join Date: July 29, 2004
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by holderca1@January 6, 2005, 7:38 AM
We need a playoff already, I still don't understand why they don't do it. It would bring in more money then the current setup. I guess it makes too much sense.
We need a playoff already, I still don't understand why they don't do it. It would bring in more money then the current setup. I guess it makes too much sense.
Forget the money, they need to make it clear cut. One winner, no questions. I'm tired of shared championships, and teams claiming that they deserve the same honor. Playoffs are the only way to go.
1/6/05, 11:30 AM
#19
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
Thread Starter
Originally posted by 63galaxie@January 6, 2005, 9:56 AM
"analysts" said they need a few more years to work out the kinks, they don't want to drag a boring season on into February, but they want enough teams to make it fair, i dunno what'll happen
hard to have a perfect season, i say just have a playoff with the top so many teams..
"analysts" said they need a few more years to work out the kinks, they don't want to drag a boring season on into February, but they want enough teams to make it fair, i dunno what'll happen
hard to have a perfect season, i say just have a playoff with the top so many teams..
And they have been working on these kinks for almost 10 years, and they fail nearly every year. College football postseason is a joke. 3 teams finished the season undefeated. That's rediculous. I say an 8 team playoff would be perfect. That would mean you have to win 3 games in the playoff to win the championship.
1/6/05, 02:57 PM
#20
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: October 15, 2004
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by holderca1+January 6, 2005, 12:33 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (holderca1 @ January 6, 2005, 12:33 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-63galaxie@January 6, 2005, 9:56 AM
"analysts" said they need a few more years to work out the kinks, they don't want to drag a boring season on into February, but they want enough teams to make it fair, i dunno what'll happen
hard to have a perfect season, i say just have a playoff with the top so many teams..
"analysts" said they need a few more years to work out the kinks, they don't want to drag a boring season on into February, but they want enough teams to make it fair, i dunno what'll happen
hard to have a perfect season, i say just have a playoff with the top so many teams..
And they have been working on these kinks for almost 10 years, and they fail nearly every year. College football postseason is a joke. 3 teams finished the season undefeated. That's rediculous. I say an 8 team playoff would be perfect. That would mean you have to win 3 games in the playoff to win the championship. [/b][/quote]
point there...i've only heard them bring it up seriously for the past few years...but it should have been recognized WAY earlier....the reason i thought there should be more teams than 8 is that there should be more of a chance for the underdogs to get in...