Let's give it up for the SEC champs!
Originally posted by AZOmae@December 10, 2004, 10:25 AM
IMO:
Auburn #1
Oklahoma #2
USC #3
Auburn is in the football powerhouse known as the SEC. Oklahoma is in no easy conference as well, but I wouldn't have USC as #1.
IMO:
Auburn #1
Oklahoma #2
USC #3
Auburn is in the football powerhouse known as the SEC. Oklahoma is in no easy conference as well, but I wouldn't have USC as #1.
i disagree... we'll see after they play Oklahoma
I would say:
1.USC
2.Auburn
3.Oklahoma
Originally posted by thezeppelin8+December 11, 2004, 1:24 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (thezeppelin8 @ December 11, 2004, 1:24 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-AZOmae@December 10, 2004, 10:25 AM
IMO:
Auburn #1
Oklahoma #2
USC #3
Auburn is in the football powerhouse known as the SEC. Oklahoma is in no easy conference as well, but I wouldn't have USC as #1.
IMO:
Auburn #1
Oklahoma #2
USC #3
Auburn is in the football powerhouse known as the SEC. Oklahoma is in no easy conference as well, but I wouldn't have USC as #1.
i disagree... we'll see after they play Oklahoma
I would say:
1.USC
2.Auburn
3.Oklahoma [/b][/quote]
Hey, I had USC #1 for most of the year. But after watching some SEC games on CBS.......
That's why we DEFINITELY need a playoff system, even if it's a 4 team playoff. But of course, numbers #5-6 would say "hey, we're just as good as #4." What can you do?
Congrats to Leinart. I thought that White or Petersen had it in the bag.
War darn Eagle.... We should be right there at # 1.. USC played poorly this year as well as OU for parts of the season. AU had one of the toughest schedules while teams like USC started on top, palyed cream puffs and just stayed by luck (as well as OU puling off some last SECOND heroics)
AU # 1
OU # 2
USC # 3
AU # 1
OU # 2
USC # 3
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
austin101385
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
3
Oct 2, 2015 01:00 PM




