my take on the Shelby rear
3/28/05, 11:04 AM
#21
Bullitt Member
Join Date: March 19, 2004
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Nice work, Doug!
Actually, they could slap the honeycomb on the back (pretty cheap) to match the front & differentiate the rear from a regular Mustang. Wouldn't cost that much.
Hey, Doug, have you done a GT500 'vert yet? Just askin, not insisting (well....maybe not insisting....
)
Actually, they could slap the honeycomb on the back (pretty cheap) to match the front & differentiate the rear from a regular Mustang. Wouldn't cost that much.
Hey, Doug, have you done a GT500 'vert yet? Just askin, not insisting (well....maybe not insisting....
)
3/28/05, 12:15 PM
#23
Team Mustang Source
Originally posted by burningman@March 28, 2005, 2:10 PM
nah haven't touched a vert yet but maybe I'll give it a shot
nah haven't touched a vert yet but maybe I'll give it a shot
3/28/05, 03:05 PM
#24
Team Mustang Source
3/28/05, 04:09 PM
#27
Bullitt Member
Join Date: January 31, 2004
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Doug as always great work. You are the man, but this one is just not my taste. I think the part that bothers me is how black area around the lights is bigger then the center portion hight wise.
3/28/05, 05:08 PM
#28
Bow Chica Bow Wow
TMS Staff
TMS Staff
Thread Starter
Thanx guys..just keep in mind this wasn't originally a shebly idea..it was for the centerfire..
I got the idea from this car
I got the idea from this car
3/28/05, 05:41 PM
#29
Originally posted by KR3259@March 27, 2005, 11:03 PM
where in the world did those tailites come from!?
that is as close to perfect for the backside of this car as you can get...nice job!
where in the world did those tailites come from!?
that is as close to perfect for the backside of this car as you can get...nice job!
P.S. thats a great looking rear for the Shelby, and I always have like those particular Shelby emblems.
3/28/05, 06:46 PM
#30
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: February 18, 2004
Posts: 874
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wouldn't it be great to get something like this. I think the problem is that Ford doesn't want to spend the time or money redesigning the rear taillight treatment for a relatively low production volume. I suspect that the 10% of the Shelby that DOES get changed won't be the rear lights, but more likely fatter rubber, different mirrors...stuff like that.
3/30/05, 05:01 PM
#36
Bullitt Member
Join Date: February 4, 2004
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I like it ... but I don't mind the Shelby lettering the way it is. Wonder what the gold letters would look like sunk down into the bottom half of your black inverted insert there.
3/30/05, 09:03 PM
#38
Originally posted by burningman@March 27, 2005, 9:25 PM
I was working on a new rear for the centerfire and was using the shelby pic as a base so i decided to strip off the centerfire stuff and post the Shelby version.
enjoy
I was working on a new rear for the centerfire and was using the shelby pic as a base so i decided to strip off the centerfire stuff and post the Shelby version.
enjoy
3/30/05, 09:57 PM
#39
Bow Chica Bow Wow
TMS Staff
TMS Staff
Thread Starter
Originally posted by bullittman68@March 29, 2005, 8:27 PM
i see where you got those taillights from that 67 vert, burningman, but the fastbacks were actually straight acrossPicture, and the middle went up:
i see where you got those taillights from that 67 vert, burningman, but the fastbacks were actually straight acrossPicture, and the middle went up:
Yeah i know and I tried that look but ditched it..i think sisnce the new stangs aren't fatbacks and are technically notches it's appropriate
3/30/05, 10:43 PM
#40
V6 Member
Join Date: January 5, 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by 1 BULLITT@March 27, 2005, 9:51 PM
But don't you DARE touch the front...
If you do, you are Doug meat.
But don't you DARE touch the front...
If you do, you are Doug meat.
