Aftermarket 2005+ Mustangs Discuss the Offerings from Roush, Saleen, Steeda, Shinoda, and Others

HTT 'Revises' GT500 Prices

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 11:09 PM
  #121  
max2000jp's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: September 2, 2004
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally posted by AFBLUE@November 15, 2005, 9:42 PM

Not to much of a difference from 03 to 07. Ford will have no problem selling every single one of them at $40K for the coupe and 45K for a vert. I initially was excited about the possibility of getting a GT500. Then reality set in. Life goes on.
That's the problem with American car companies, they only focus on sales. The VW Bug is the best selling car ever, would you want one? Ford has a huge marketing campaign out right now about "Innovation is the Key to Ford's future". What innovation does the GT500 bring to the table? I can't think of anything. I just personally get tired of the mentality in Detroit. They can produce great cars, but settle on what has worked in the past. This mentality is the reason why they are losing market share.
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2005 | 11:42 PM
  #122  
eurostyle's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: July 14, 2005
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Guys,
Right now everything is speculation, lets see what they bring at the show January 6. If the car is worth crap we should start a nationwide campaign in EVERY forum telling each and every Mustang fan NOT to buy the car. Then, we'll see who is going to bend first, Ford or the greedy Dealers.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 04:03 AM
  #123  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally posted by max2000jp@November 15, 2005, 11:12 PM
That's the problem with American car companies, they only focus on sales. The VW Bug is the best selling car ever, would you want one? Ford has a huge marketing campaign out right now about "Innovation is the Key to Ford's future". What innovation does the GT500 bring to the table? I can't think of anything. I just personally get tired of the mentality in Detroit. They can produce great cars, but settle on what has worked in the past. This mentality is the reason why they are losing market share.
Well said. It worries me that they STILL seem to be operating from this Jurassic mentality.

Frankly, it doesn't bode well for Ford's future.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 04:04 AM
  #124  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally posted by eurostyle@November 15, 2005, 11:45 PM
Guys,
Right now everything is speculation, lets see what they bring at the show January 6. If the car is worth crap we should start a nationwide campaign in EVERY forum telling each and every Mustang fan NOT to buy the car. Then, we'll see who is going to bend first, Ford or the greedy Dealers.
I'm still hoping we won't have to do this. But the way things are going, hope is dwindling fast.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 06:33 AM
  #125  
05stangkc's Avatar
Administrator clevparts@aol.com
 
Joined: November 27, 2004
Posts: 12,562
Likes: 4,312
From: Visalia Ca.
Just Hope they do not show up on Barrett Jackson. Some High roller will get in a Bidding War and get 100k. I can see it now.The Dealers will get Really Silly Really Fast. I guarantee that some of the People who have {ordered} The Shelby will get stiffed. It's going to happin Right or Wrong It's going to happin.

kc
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 08:29 AM
  #126  
Tony Alonso's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: February 8, 2004
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 7
From: Cincinnati, OH
Originally posted by 1 BULLITT@November 15, 2005, 4:13 PM
It's back to the basic supply and demand, which if conflicts with one's plans it can be offset with time and patience. The best and latest examples are the early '03 Mach 1 and Cobra buyers who instantly became Preparation H subscribers while the '04 buyers not only bought a better product but paid a lot less.
Early Mach 1 buyers like me originally heard "only 6500". It was never fully established if that was formally published by Ford or people speculating on behalf of Ford (although there supposedly was a Ford publication that mentioned that nnumber). When there were over 8000 orders submitted by dealers by early 2003, it did not take too long to hear the production numbers were going up. Within 8-10 months of the car's December 2002 introduction date, there were rebates of up to $4000 for the now-to-be '03 and '04 Mach 1 models.

People who are hearing "only 7000 for 2 years" and responding with a "gotta have it now" mentality might be in a similar boat. Wait and then buy carefully. From a "Preparation H subscriber", this is the best advice I would give.

By the way, if Ford was going to be constrained on anything that would limit volume, I would suspect the engine to be the major component. And as far as cost and content, I think even the Mustang GT is still too much money. I would argue it should be priced in the $24,000 range rather than $28,000 (MSRP and eqipped with popular options). However, engineering a new platform, moving to an all new (albeit flexible) plant, and Ford's general financial health all factor into it, I suppose.

What people have been speculating here about a $40K coupe and $45K convertible makes perfect sense. I don't think we will see a $45K coupe. As AFBLUE indicated, the price differentials between a GT coupe and SVT coupe seem to be in line over the years. I remember being shocked hearing the '03 Cobras being priced where they were. Now some people don't bat an eye at a $30K+ GT convertible.

I am waiting for the $3000 rebates on the GT
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 08:40 AM
  #127  
MSP's Avatar
MSP
Banned
 
Joined: September 19, 2005
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Tony Alonso@November 16, 2005, 7:32 AM
Early Mach 1 buyers like me originally heard "only 6500". It was never fully established if that was formally published by Ford or people speculating on behalf of Ford (although there supposedly was a Ford publication that mentioned that nnumber). When there were over 8000 orders submitted by dealers by early 2003, it did not take too long to hear the production numbers were going up. Within 8-10 months of the car's December 2002 introduction date, there were rebates of up to $4000 for the now-to-be '03 and '04 Mach 1 models.

People who are hearing "only 7000 for 2 years" and responding with a "gotta have it now" mentality might be in a similar boat. Wait and then buy carefully. From a "Preparation H subscriber", this is the best advice I would give.

By the way, if Ford was going to be constrained on anything that would limit volume, I would suspect the engine to be the major component. And as far as cost and content, I think even the Mustang GT is still too much money. I would argue it should be priced in the $24,000 range rather than $28,000 (MSRP and eqipped with popular options). However, engineering a new platform, moving to an all new (albeit flexible) plant, and Ford's general financial health all factor into it, I suppose.

What people have been speculating here about a $40K coupe and $45K convertible makes perfect sense. I don't think we will see a $45K coupe. As AFBLUE indicated, the price differentials between a GT coupe and SVT coupe seem to be in line over the years. I remember being shocked hearing the '03 Cobras being priced where they were. Now some people don't bat an eye at a $30K+ GT convertible.

I am waiting for the $3000 rebates on the GT

I would love to see an 05+ Mustang offered with an IRS suspension, mated to the 03 Cobra Drive-Train... They could produce about 9000 of these, and call it a day.. Selling them for $36K.. They could still call it a GT..

Also, it would be nice for Ford to offer this type of package to people ordering there cars... I think Ford could escape all this gridlock if they were to allow everyone to order their Stangs with different options.. These cars may take longer to get, but overall the response would be positive..

Engine choices could be 4.0,4.6,5.4,5.8... Or No engine at all.. Can we order rolling chassis? LOL!! That would be awsome..

All joles aside, I believe if Ford were to re-innovate their component line up, to make the Mustang options more robust they could infact be on better footing..

No matter how hard we try, and how long this is discussed, someone is going to drop $80K to $100K on a GT500.. When this happens, it will force all other GT500's to sit on lots for a period of 4 to 6 months, untouched or looked at by sane individuals.. Watch!
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 09:04 AM
  #128  
crazyhorse's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 2,478
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
Originally posted by MSP@November 16, 2005, 10:43 AM

No matter how hard we try, and how long this is discussed, someone is going to drop $80K to $100K on a GT500..
The only way I could see this happening is if it is #0001. even #0002 will not bring anywhere near this figure.

This is becoming a dead end subject just like IRS vs. SRA. There are those that feel the cars will not be available without paying a premium and those that feel we will be buying discounted cars eventually. I suppose all we can do is wait until they start selling and see what each one goes for. We'll have to do a thread stating price paid.

The reason I keep posting the same thing ("no the AMVs won't last") is because I feel that what people read is what they will believe. If people keep posting "you won't get one for less than $55k", then they will start to believe that. I honestly don't think the AMV will last and I feel like I need to keep reminding the readers of that.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 11:13 AM
  #129  
mr-mstng's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 4,743
Likes: 4
From: NE PA
Originally posted by crazyhorse@November 16, 2005, 11:07 AM
The reason I keep posting the same thing ("no the AMVs won't last") is because I feel that what people read is what they will believe. If people keep posting "you won't get one for less than $55k", then they will start to believe that. I honestly don't think the AMV will last and I feel like I need to keep reminding the readers of that.
Agreed. One only has to look to Ford GT as proof.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 11:36 AM
  #130  
MustangFanatic's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: September 10, 2004
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte NC
Originally posted by crazyhorse@November 16, 2005, 10:07 AM
The only way I could see this happening is if it is #0001. even #0002 will not bring anywhere near this figure.

This is becoming a dead end subject just like IRS vs. SRA. There are those that feel the cars will not be available without paying a premium and those that feel we will be buying discounted cars eventually. I suppose all we can do is wait until they start selling and see what each one goes for. We'll have to do a thread stating price paid.

The reason I keep posting the same thing ("no the AMVs won't last") is because I feel that what people read is what they will believe. If people keep posting "you won't get one for less than $55k", then they will start to believe that. I honestly don't think the AMV will last and I feel like I need to keep reminding the readers of that.
Mr. GT500 has spoken. Well said Kevin, and the point you raise on AMV is critical.

No matter what the final MSRP ends up being, as a group we should focus on driving your point home, DO NOT pay an AMV for the GT500 or any other vehicle!! If enthusiasts stick together as a group and make the statement that we won't pay an AMV, it will benefit all of us and prevent dealers from using this tactic in the future. I don't hold any false illusions that we can make this a reality but we can only blame ourselves if we don't make an attempt.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 02:48 PM
  #131  
1 COBRA's Avatar
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 7,738
Likes: 361
From: U S A
Originally posted by crazyhorse@November 16, 2005, 12:07 PM
... This is becoming a dead end subject just like IRS vs. SRA.


Or the 6-SPD vs. the A/T.


Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 07:03 PM
  #132  
crispy23c's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: March 19, 2004
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Geez, I thought this thread had to do with HTT's statement of a Mustang "North of $45k", not dealer mark-up to make it over $45k. :scratch: Sorry! I'll pay $45k for a GT500 Vert.

In any event, I am waiting before final judgement. I just want Ford to get my message! :bang:

History of my messages to Ford since intro:
New Mustang:
Shelby Concept: :worship:
Initial specs (2 screw, 500 hp, etc: :worship:
Loss of some key items, but 450+ HP: :scratch: ....... :notnice:
Rumors of dealer gouge: :notnice:
Possible Ford de-content & price increase: :bang:

What next:
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2005 | 09:53 PM
  #133  
eurostyle's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: July 14, 2005
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
Originally posted by MustangFanatic@November 16, 2005, 12:39 PM

No matter what the final MSRP ends up being, as a group we should focus on driving your point home, DO NOT pay an AMV for the GT500 or any other vehicle!! If enthusiasts stick together as a group and make the statement that we won't pay an AMV, it will benefit all of us and prevent dealers from using this tactic in the future. I don't hold any false illusions that we can make this a reality but we can only blame ourselves if we don't make an attempt.
What's happened with the GT is going to happen with the 500. Ford already has the money in the Bank by selling cash and the Dealer is playing the game. Dealers have million dollars investment and they can afford the % for borrowing money if they can make a better profit by sitting tight. Granted, some GT have been sold for close to MSRP but the mayority of dealers made a killing by asking AMV. I had a dealer who will get two GT500, was #1 on the list at 5K over MSRP, assume it will sell for 40K + 5K AMV + tax & lic., I am looking at over 50K and frankly, this car is not worth that much money period.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 01:44 AM
  #134  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally posted by crispy23c@November 16, 2005, 7:06 PM
What next:
Ford headquarters.

Reply
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 03:41 AM
  #135  
1 COBRA's Avatar
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 7,738
Likes: 361
From: U S A
Originally posted by MustangFanatic@November 16, 2005, 2:39 PM
... No matter what the final MSRP ends up being, as a group we should focus on driving your point home, DO NOT pay an AMV for the GT500 or any other vehicle!!
Keep in mind dealers love to make potential buyers think the AMV is a must, if that fails then it is used as a bargaining chip to try to settle for MSRP and make it seem as a great deal for the buyer. The AMV tactic is often an attempt to eliminate bargaining below MSRP.

Here is a short story: My '04 had a $5K AMV. There were 10 coupes available in stock in Florida at the time, all with the same AMV. I spoke to every dealer, two of them were receptive to negotiating. The negotiating started at $1K below MSRP and kept going back and forth with the two dealers. I wound up paying $2K below MSRP to a SVT dealer which I had never done business with. The deal was made over the phone with faxes exchanged and a credit card to secure the deal. In other words, the dealer sold the car for $1K over invoice which matched the highest I'd ever paid for a high performance Mustang. Research, patience, and negotiating always pays.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 05:03 AM
  #136  
crazyhorse's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 2,478
Likes: 1
From: Indiana
Originally posted by eurostyle@November 16, 2005, 11:56 PM
What's happened with the GT is going to happen with the 500. Ford already has the money in the Bank by selling cash and the Dealer is playing the game. Dealers have million dollars investment and they can afford the % for borrowing money if they can make a better profit by sitting tight. Granted, some GT have been sold for close to MSRP but the mayority of dealers made a killing by asking AMV. I had a dealer who will get two GT500, was #1 on the list at 5K over MSRP, assume it will sell for 40K + 5K AMV + tax & lic., I am looking at over 50K and frankly, this car is not worth that much money period.
The Ford GT is an entirely different animal. It is a rare supercar that only the wealthy can afford. Even it, eventually, came down to MSRP.

The dealer telling you he would get 2 GT500s is pulling the wool over your eyes. He does not know what he is getting yet. The letter published earlier giving examples of allotment is basically minimum allotment. The catch in that is the "Share of Nation" part. That is where all the extra cars come in. It is what is left after the minimums are distributed. The rest are given to dealerships based on their prior Mustang sales. Obviously, the larger the dealer, the more he will get.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 05:07 AM
  #137  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally posted by 1 BULLITT@November 17, 2005, 3:44 AM
Keep in mind dealers love to make potential buyers think the AMV is a must, if that fails then it is used as a bargaining chip to try to settle for MSRP and make it seem as a great deal for the buyer. The AMV tactic is often an attempt to eliminate bargaining below MSRP.

Here is a short story: My '04 had a $5K AMV. There were 10 coupes available in stock in Florida at the time, all with the same AMV. I spoke to every dealer, two of them were receptive to negotiating. The negotiating started at $1K below MSRP and kept going back and forth with the two dealers. I wound up paying $2K below MSRP to a SVT dealer which I had never done business with. The deal was made over the phone with faxes exchanged and a credit card to secure the deal. In other words, the dealer sold the car for $1K over invoice which matched the highest I'd ever paid for a high performance Mustang. Research, patience, and negotiating always pays.
It does indeed. My feeling has always been that if a dealer tries to pull that nonsense on you, you simply look at him with one of these give him one of these :nono: and then if he lips you off do this

Then walk out and give them one of these just to show there's no hard feelings.



Seriously, though, while there will no doubt be dealers who try and tell you that you have about as much chance of getting into one of these cars at MSRP as Pat Robertson has of becoming Ambassador to Venezuela, it's all rhetoric. I just don't believe there are 7500 dumb people out there with that much money burning holes in their pockets.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 05:12 AM
  #138  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Originally posted by crazyhorse@November 17, 2005, 5:06 AM
The dealer telling you he would get 2 GT500s is pulling the wool over your eyes. He does not know what he is getting yet.
BINGO

Dealers might want to adopt a wait-and-see approach to this car, to ensure that customers aren't woefully disappointed with what Ford turns out. Be amusing indeed if interest fell off after the first two month feeding frenzy, and GT500s just sat on lots.

Course, then there was yesterday's recall on yet more large numbers of Ford vehicles.

I just don't think it's too much to ask for Ford to give us the car they showed us in NY, without "dumbing down" the feature content. In fact, it would be nice to see a few added features, like body-colored, breakaway mirrors, and maybe some heated seats.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 10:48 AM
  #139  
snkbtn99's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 6, 2004
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
Originally posted by crazyhorse@November 11, 2005, 8:12 AM
BC, do you have a source for this quote? I'm getting "page cannot be displayed" from your link. edit: Nevermind, I got it to work.

Brad, any info on this from your source?

I don't necessarily disagree that it will be worth it. If this is true, however, I think HTT will be headed for a short stay with SVT. He has made several statements that are not being backed up. There will be a lot of SVT enthusiast leaving the SVT family for 2 primary reasons:

1. The car will be priced out of their market. The core SVT buyers are Mustang buyers that have gone that little bit extra to afford the top dog Mustang. The $50k and up buyers are typically Vette, BMW, Lexus, etc. buyers. Get above $50 and you are inching toward Z06 territory.

2. Faith in the SVT brand. They have taken away the other models (L, Focus). They have gone 2 years without any product. They promised (using the term loosely) several things that have slowly changed like twin screw SC, IRS, better brakes, heavy stitching on the the nice leather interior, price under $40k, and probably more that I am forgetting about.

I realize that we haven't seen the production car, its specs or its price yet, but, I honestly feel that if the car shown in January is that decontented and comes in over $45k, a large percentage of the SVT faithful will jump ship.
Crazy, you are absolutely correct ..... Having been a long time owner and supporter of SVT, I do not see this as very encouraging.

What ever happened to them hanging their hat on the sub $40k sticker price ....??

As I have said before, This car will not be in the main stream like the '03/'04 Cobra.

I am very disappointed with SVT right now .....
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2005 | 11:25 AM
  #140  
MustangFanatic's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: September 10, 2004
Posts: 1,302
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte NC
Originally posted by BC_Shelby@November 17, 2005, 6:15 AM
BINGO
I just don't think it's too much to ask for Ford to give us the car they showed us in NY, without "dumbing down" the feature content. In fact, it would be nice to see a few added features, like body-colored, breakaway mirrors, and maybe some heated seats.
Amen!!!
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:06 AM.