Turbo Power!
1/12/06, 01:50 PM
#1
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: October 14, 2005
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have to run to class, so I haven't even read these yet, but this just arrived in my in-box!
Thank you for the interest in our products, attached to this e-mail is two PDF files that include the valuable information that you have requested.
The pricing is as follows:
05-Current V8 Mustang GT, $5495.99
05-Current V6 Mustang intercooled, $4795.99
05-Current V6 Mustang non intercooled, $3995.99
All the systems will be available and ready for delivery by the end of
March 2006.
Mike Bowen
PowerHouse Automotive, LLC
www.PowerHouse411.com
814 774 4966
AGHHHH!!!! It won't let me post the PDF!!! It's only 284 kbs! WHAT GIVES!!!
Thank you for the interest in our products, attached to this e-mail is two PDF files that include the valuable information that you have requested.
The pricing is as follows:
05-Current V8 Mustang GT, $5495.99
05-Current V6 Mustang intercooled, $4795.99
05-Current V6 Mustang non intercooled, $3995.99
All the systems will be available and ready for delivery by the end of
March 2006.
Mike Bowen
PowerHouse Automotive, LLC
www.PowerHouse411.com
814 774 4966
AGHHHH!!!! It won't let me post the PDF!!! It's only 284 kbs! WHAT GIVES!!!
1/12/06, 02:03 PM
#4
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: October 14, 2005
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Can't cut and paste, either.
But of note to a previous discussion is that Mike says that the system is capable of producing from 285RWHP to 450+RWHP (racing fuel)
Hmmmm, unless he is just outright LYING an answer (not THE answer) about breaking the 400RWHP was just given to us....
Available w 7, 9, 12 PSI
You can buy just the 7 (cannot be adjusted up) without an intercooler.
Hmm... can anyone else say TURBOPOWER?
Now where is that X-Charger?
Decision, decision, decisions....
BTW, the GT one makes 450 - 675 RWHP.
The shop car ran a best 05 10.65@131MPH...
But of note to a previous discussion is that Mike says that the system is capable of producing from 285RWHP to 450+RWHP (racing fuel)
Hmmmm, unless he is just outright LYING an answer (not THE answer) about breaking the 400RWHP was just given to us....
Available w 7, 9, 12 PSI
You can buy just the 7 (cannot be adjusted up) without an intercooler.
Hmm... can anyone else say TURBOPOWER?
Now where is that X-Charger?
Decision, decision, decisions....
BTW, the GT one makes 450 - 675 RWHP.
The shop car ran a best 05 10.65@131MPH...
1/12/06, 02:05 PM
#5
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: October 14, 2005
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by hamidlmt@January 12, 2006, 5:06 PM
How about some screen caps of the .pdf?
[attachmentid=42760][attachmentid=42761]
How about some screen caps of the .pdf?
[attachmentid=42760][attachmentid=42761]
Looks like I have to stay shorty for the TC.
1/12/06, 02:13 PM
#7
Originally posted by Excepcion13@January 12, 2006, 3:53 PM
I have to run to class, so I haven't even read these yet, but this just arrived in my in-box!
Thank you for the interest in our products, attached to this e-mail is two PDF files that include the valuable information that you have requested.
The pricing is as follows:
05-Current V8 Mustang GT, $5495.99
05-Current V6 Mustang intercooled, $4795.99
05-Current V6 Mustang non intercooled, $3995.99
All the systems will be available and ready for delivery by the end of
March 2006.
Mike Bowen
PowerHouse Automotive, LLC
www.PowerHouse411.com
814 774 4966
AGHHHH!!!! It won't let me post the PDF!!! It's only 284 kbs! WHAT GIVES!!!
I have to run to class, so I haven't even read these yet, but this just arrived in my in-box!
Thank you for the interest in our products, attached to this e-mail is two PDF files that include the valuable information that you have requested.
The pricing is as follows:
05-Current V8 Mustang GT, $5495.99
05-Current V6 Mustang intercooled, $4795.99
05-Current V6 Mustang non intercooled, $3995.99
All the systems will be available and ready for delivery by the end of
March 2006.
Mike Bowen
PowerHouse Automotive, LLC
www.PowerHouse411.com
814 774 4966
AGHHHH!!!! It won't let me post the PDF!!! It's only 284 kbs! WHAT GIVES!!!
LOL, I got the same email, with the same password protected PDF file. Tried to open it on my blackberry and was prompted for a password.
1/12/06, 02:30 PM
#8
Yea, the pdf is protected. Can't copy/paste the contents. Oh well.
1/12/06, 02:31 PM
#9
Cobra Member
Join Date: July 28, 2005
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by rygenstormlocke@January 12, 2006, 4:33 PM
Yea, the pdf is protected. Can't copy/paste the contents. Oh well.
Yea, the pdf is protected. Can't copy/paste the contents. Oh well.
can you email it to me and see if I can host it... then put a link in the sticky thread??
1/12/06, 03:09 PM
#11
Cobra Member
Join Date: July 28, 2005
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks to Rygen who sent me the PDF...
The PDF can now be found here:
PowerHouse V6 Turbo
I'll let Jimp add it to the sticky if he wants...
The PDF can now be found here:
PowerHouse V6 Turbo
I'll let Jimp add it to the sticky if he wants...
1/12/06, 03:57 PM
#12
Originally posted by scrming@January 12, 2006, 6:12 PM
Thanks to Rygen who sent me the PDF...
The PDF can now be found here:
PowerHouse V6 Turbo
I'll let Jimp add it to the sticky if he wants... LOL
Thanks to Rygen who sent me the PDF...
The PDF can now be found here:
PowerHouse V6 Turbo
I'll let Jimp add it to the sticky if he wants... LOL
1/12/06, 04:20 PM
#14
Cobra Member
Join Date: July 28, 2005
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1/12/06, 04:22 PM
#15
Banned
Join Date: September 19, 2005
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mike sent it over to me to.. Thanks Mike!!
Off to work, will discuss this later.. Keep up the good work guys!!
Looks like 12psi has been ok'd!! No problem...
Now where is that 12psi pulley? Ahhhh!! There it is!! Lets not forget that bag of ice!! HMMM... There it is!!
Who am I gonna smack around first?
Off to work, will discuss this later.. Keep up the good work guys!!
Looks like 12psi has been ok'd!! No problem...
Now where is that 12psi pulley? Ahhhh!! There it is!! Lets not forget that bag of ice!! HMMM... There it is!!
Who am I gonna smack around first?
1/13/06, 02:29 PM
#18
Mike had this to say about the turbo on another forum:
"I am not going to answer the question as to which one is better but alow me to point out a few things.
The non intercooled system is capable of being upgraded to the intercooled version very easily.
The non intercooled turbo will make the same amount of power and significantly more torque when compared to the intercooled supercharger.
A shot of nitrous is by no means necessary, that is typically reserved for small cu.in. with realitivly huge turbos, such as hi hp imports or even hi hp 2.3 turbo cars.
The above photo is a shot of a launch at NMRA Bowling Green KY, 9psi intercooled, 3.55 gear. On this pass the car went 12.50@111. The car is full ~ 3600lbs with driver.
The same combo above with 11.5 psi went 11.81@117 At Milan MI.
The system has no noticible "lag", which is a term that should be reserved for centrifigal superchargers, because of the design, centi s/c will not make peak boost until peak rpm, which in turn leaves torque on the table. Torque is what HP is calculated from. A turbo will make boost (if sized correctly) at a low rpm, and carry that exact level through the entire engine operating rpm.
The 4.0 is not a very rpm happy motor, with stock cams it likes to be < 5800rpm, so a low gear and early shifts are a must, most s/c guys will typically run a higher (numerically) gear to alow the s/c to get into it's peak boost faster. These higher rpm will also help shorten the life of a stock motor.
I am sure the debate will ensue, but if anyof you have any questions please feel free to give me a shout.
"
Not sure if everyone reads every forum like I do, lol!
"I am not going to answer the question as to which one is better but alow me to point out a few things.
The non intercooled system is capable of being upgraded to the intercooled version very easily.
The non intercooled turbo will make the same amount of power and significantly more torque when compared to the intercooled supercharger.
A shot of nitrous is by no means necessary, that is typically reserved for small cu.in. with realitivly huge turbos, such as hi hp imports or even hi hp 2.3 turbo cars.
The above photo is a shot of a launch at NMRA Bowling Green KY, 9psi intercooled, 3.55 gear. On this pass the car went 12.50@111. The car is full ~ 3600lbs with driver.
The same combo above with 11.5 psi went 11.81@117 At Milan MI.
The system has no noticible "lag", which is a term that should be reserved for centrifigal superchargers, because of the design, centi s/c will not make peak boost until peak rpm, which in turn leaves torque on the table. Torque is what HP is calculated from. A turbo will make boost (if sized correctly) at a low rpm, and carry that exact level through the entire engine operating rpm.
The 4.0 is not a very rpm happy motor, with stock cams it likes to be < 5800rpm, so a low gear and early shifts are a must, most s/c guys will typically run a higher (numerically) gear to alow the s/c to get into it's peak boost faster. These higher rpm will also help shorten the life of a stock motor.
I am sure the debate will ensue, but if anyof you have any questions please feel free to give me a shout.
"
Not sure if everyone reads every forum like I do, lol!
1/13/06, 02:40 PM
#20
Originally posted by Jimp@January 13, 2006, 4:32 PM
Mike had this to say about the turbo on another forum:
"I am not going to answer the question as to which one is better but alow me to point out a few things.
The non intercooled system is capable of being upgraded to the intercooled version very easily.
The non intercooled turbo will make the same amount of power and significantly more torque when compared to the intercooled supercharger.
A shot of nitrous is by no means necessary, that is typically reserved for small cu.in. with realitivly huge turbos, such as hi hp imports or even hi hp 2.3 turbo cars.
The above photo is a shot of a launch at NMRA Bowling Green KY, 9psi intercooled, 3.55 gear. On this pass the car went 12.50@111. The car is full ~ 3600lbs with driver.
The same combo above with 11.5 psi went 11.81@117 At Milan MI.
The system has no noticible "lag", which is a term that should be reserved for centrifigal superchargers, because of the design, centi s/c will not make peak boost until peak rpm, which in turn leaves torque on the table. Torque is what HP is calculated from. A turbo will make boost (if sized correctly) at a low rpm, and carry that exact level through the entire engine operating rpm.
The 4.0 is not a very rpm happy motor, with stock cams it likes to be < 5800rpm, so a low gear and early shifts are a must, most s/c guys will typically run a higher (numerically) gear to alow the s/c to get into it's peak boost faster. These higher rpm will also help shorten the life of a stock motor.
I am sure the debate will ensue, but if anyof you have any questions please feel free to give me a shout.
"
Not sure if everyone reads every forum like I do, lol!
Mike had this to say about the turbo on another forum:
"I am not going to answer the question as to which one is better but alow me to point out a few things.
The non intercooled system is capable of being upgraded to the intercooled version very easily.
The non intercooled turbo will make the same amount of power and significantly more torque when compared to the intercooled supercharger.
A shot of nitrous is by no means necessary, that is typically reserved for small cu.in. with realitivly huge turbos, such as hi hp imports or even hi hp 2.3 turbo cars.
The above photo is a shot of a launch at NMRA Bowling Green KY, 9psi intercooled, 3.55 gear. On this pass the car went 12.50@111. The car is full ~ 3600lbs with driver.
The same combo above with 11.5 psi went 11.81@117 At Milan MI.
The system has no noticible "lag", which is a term that should be reserved for centrifigal superchargers, because of the design, centi s/c will not make peak boost until peak rpm, which in turn leaves torque on the table. Torque is what HP is calculated from. A turbo will make boost (if sized correctly) at a low rpm, and carry that exact level through the entire engine operating rpm.
The 4.0 is not a very rpm happy motor, with stock cams it likes to be < 5800rpm, so a low gear and early shifts are a must, most s/c guys will typically run a higher (numerically) gear to alow the s/c to get into it's peak boost faster. These higher rpm will also help shorten the life of a stock motor.
I am sure the debate will ensue, but if anyof you have any questions please feel free to give me a shout.
"
Not sure if everyone reads every forum like I do, lol!
Yep, I saw this one too! Check it out, TJ is all over it:
http://www.mustangforums.com/m_928372/tm.htm
Good job TJ.
Thanks for posting this up over here Jimp.