V6 Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang V6 Performance and Technical Information

True Trac vs. Ford Racing T-lok

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12/12/05, 09:51 PM
  #1  
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
 
garyb900's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 22, 2005
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 545
Received 20 Likes on 12 Posts
I know there has been a lot of discussion on these two differentials and excuse me if this has been gone over before but I couldn't find it so if it's out there let me know the thread it's in.

What is the difference between the Detroit True Trac and the Ford Racing T-lok? Other than the cost, I know the Detroit TT is more.
What are the pros & cons of each? I saw a mention that the TT splits the traction 70/30 in turns so there isn't "scuff", does the FRTLok do that also?

A friend of mine said that if I get the T-lok I would have problems in slow turns like in parking lots because both wheels would want to spin at the same speed and that it is really only for people that want straight line launches at the track.

Thanks for any advise.
Old 12/13/05, 02:11 AM
  #2  
Mach 1 Member
 
1trickpony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2, 2005
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I never had any trouble with a t-lok in slow turns on my 94 GT. I think the 7.5 inch t-lok and 8.8 are basically the same. I've never had a true trac but I did a little research. I wouldn't expect a big difference at this power level. About the only thing I saw was the T-lok uses a cluth that can burn out and the True trac does not. The Tru trac might last longer. Hope this helps.
Old 12/13/05, 04:27 AM
  #3  
Cobra Member
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 28, 2005
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 1trickpony@December 13, 2005, 4:14 AM
I never had any trouble with a t-lok in slow turns on my 94 GT. I think the 7.5 inch t-lok and 8.8 are basically the same. I've never had a true trac but I did a little research. I wouldn't expect a big difference at this power level. About the only thing I saw was the T-lok uses a cluth that can burn out and the True trac does not. The Tru trac might last longer. Hope this helps.
I've got the t-lok... I've never had any problom with tight turns... no clunk, jumping... nothing.. always smooth... yes, the clutch will eventually wear out... but it can be easily rebuilt for somthing like $50... I've been abusing mine since August (10,000 miles)... I've also have been know to put 384 pounds of torque through it... LOL! Good unit for the price... and it held up pretty good... no personal experience with the TT... I may someday... LOL!
Old 12/13/05, 06:36 AM
  #4  
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
 
garyb900's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 22, 2005
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 545
Received 20 Likes on 12 Posts
Thanks for the help guys.
I will only be using it for a daily driver and won't be doing any hard driving with it other than the normal stomping on the pedal on the street.
I'm waiting on a C&L and X-cal2 from Doug right now but I plan on putting in 3.73 gears and the t-lok in early next year.
Sounds like for the price I can go with the t-lok with no worries.
Old 12/13/05, 06:43 AM
  #5  
 
rygenstormlocke's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 4, 2005
Posts: 1,856
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by garyb900@December 13, 2005, 8:39 AM
Thanks for the help guys.
I will only be using it for a daily driver and won't be doing any hard driving with it other than the normal stomping on the pedal on the street.
I'm waiting on a C&L and X-cal2 from Doug right now but I plan on putting in 3.73 gears and the t-lok in early next year.
Sounds like for the price I can go with the t-lok with no worries.

Yep, the TT is if you plan for 400+ RWHP, but the TLOK is good for power adders too. For mid-level modding, like tuners, CAI, exhaust and daily driver, your best bet is to go with TLOK as it is a lot less.

For me, some day I will probably break the gears in mine, on that day, I will gladly drop the 7.5 and swap it with a 8.8 from a GT. So my mission is to see what this thing can handle, after I put a girdle and panhard relocation bracket on it of course.
Old 12/13/05, 06:46 AM
  #6  
Bullitt Member
 
Excepcion13's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 14, 2005
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The T-Lok is still an LSD, so unlike a locker, it will not fight you when you begin to turn. I think your friend may have been referring to a locker, but I could be mistaken.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with the T-Lok, and it is about $130 cheaper than the TT. I bought a TT because I liked the idea of no clutch plates, smooth torque distribution, and more than enough strength for my needs. I did not want to have to go to an 8.8 rear if I built some serious power in my machine, so I decided on the TT and a girdle. More than likely, going to those lengths was unnecessary. But I will never know, because it is doubtful that I will ever break it! And if I do, then I am pushing some SERIOUS power.

If I am not mistaken, the GT comes with a Trac-Lok, and some of the GT owners are pushing 400+ HP with theirs without an upgrade. They have an 8.8, though.
Old 12/13/05, 06:56 AM
  #7  
 
rygenstormlocke's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 4, 2005
Posts: 1,856
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by Excepcion13@December 13, 2005, 8:49 AM
The T-Lok is still an LSD, so unlike a locker, it will not fight you when you begin to turn. I think your friend may have been referring to a locker, but I could be mistaken.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with the T-Lok, and it is about $130 cheaper than the TT. I bought a TT because I liked the idea of no clutch plates, smooth torque distribution, and more than enough strength for my needs. I did not want to have to go to an 8.8 rear if I built some serious power in my machine, so I decided on the TT and a girdle. More than likely, going to those lengths was unnecessary. But I will never know, because it is doubtful that I will ever break it! And if I do, then I am pushing some SERIOUS power.

If I am not mistaken, the GT comes with a Trac-Lok, and some of the GT owners are pushing 400+ HP with theirs without an upgrade. They have an 8.8, though.
You are correct, the GT 8.8 comes with a TLOK standard, and they are pushing 400 RWHP with stock components. Also, the TLOK in the GT is of the same design as the one for the 7.5.
Old 12/13/05, 07:32 AM
  #8  
Legacy TMS Member
Thread Starter
 
garyb900's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 22, 2005
Location: Elgin, IL
Posts: 545
Received 20 Likes on 12 Posts
That's exactly what I needed to hear. I got worried when my friend mentioned the turning problem but as you said he must have been thinking I was talking about a locker when I said t-lok.Thanks.
For what I need the t-lok is right.
Now I just have to save the cash up to pay for it.
Come on Christmas bonus!
Old 12/13/05, 10:01 AM
  #9  
Mach 1 Member
 
hamidlmt's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 1, 2005
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'll be going with a t-lok, when I do get around to upgrading. Probably early next year.
Old 12/13/05, 07:17 PM
  #10  
 
rygenstormlocke's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 4, 2005
Posts: 1,856
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by hamidlmt@December 13, 2005, 12:04 PM
I'll be going with a t-lok, when I do get around to upgrading. Probably early next year.

You have a lot of patience, I personally am trying to figure out my mods before the end of 05.
Old 12/13/05, 10:04 PM
  #11  
Mach 1 Member
 
hamidlmt's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 1, 2005
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rygen... when, and if, you ever get done.. your car is gonna be a monster!
Old 12/13/05, 11:27 PM
  #12  
Bullitt Member
 
Gearhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 7, 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
After having my Detroit TrueTrac installed now for about 1,500 miles of driving through dry, rain, and snow, I can only say it is well worth the money! My experience with limited slip rear ends in my 4x4 rigs is that they really have limited added traction in ice and snow, as the name implies. The TrueTrac keeps both wheels turning in the very sloppy & slick stuff. Also, it is superior in wet-road handling as it has no propensity to force the rear wheels to turn at the same rate when that might cost you the extra traction you need to get around the corner. As far as longevity, I have always felt that about 30,000 miles is the wear-out time for most limited slips, and I just don't want to break into my rear end that often.
I would recommend that if you plan to keep the car at least 10 years, pay the extra money now. It would be cheaper in the long run. In addition, I feel that TrueTrac has already helped me avoid a slide-out on a corner I hit way too hot in the pouring rain, and that in itself has paid for the purchase cost.
Old 12/14/05, 12:11 AM
  #13  
Mach 1 Member
 
hamidlmt's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 1, 2005
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So, is Ford Racing's t-lok going to give out around 30,000 miles?
Old 12/14/05, 12:50 AM
  #14  
Mach 1 Member
 
Zodiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 22, 2004
Posts: 774
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just a thought, but believeing the Ford T-lok will only last 30K miles is saying that every car its been used in has had its rearend repaired at 30K miles.. this just isnt true. It would mean that even the new GTs, albeit using an 8.8, would on principle be replacing the LSD alone every 30K miles.... doesnt seem right to me.
Old 12/14/05, 04:28 AM
  #15  
Cobra Member
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 28, 2005
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Zodiac@December 14, 2005, 2:53 AM
Just a thought, but believeing the Ford T-lok will only last 30K miles is saying that every car its been used in has had its rearend repaired at 30K miles.. this just isnt true. It would mean that even the new GTs, albeit using an 8.8, would on principle be replacing the LSD alone every 30K miles.... doesnt seem right to me.
Agreed... I've had a number of LSD units over the years.. none of them ever needed to be repair... my last one was an 02 GT with well over 30K miles.. had about 60K when I got rid of it... And I doubt Ford would put some thing like a T-Lok in that is going to need to replaced before the base 3yr/36,000 mile warranty is up...
Old 12/14/05, 06:17 AM
  #16  
 
rygenstormlocke's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 4, 2005
Posts: 1,856
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by hamidlmt@December 14, 2005, 12:07 AM
Rygen... when, and if, you ever get done.. your car is gonna be a monster!

Thanks man.
Old 12/14/05, 05:53 PM
  #17  
Bullitt Member
 
Gearhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 7, 2005
Location: Washington
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Limited Slip rear ends work very well for the first 30,000 miles, then they work less well. The older they get, the less force they will apply to the wheel with more traction. They don't "break"; they just fade away.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ecostang
'10-14 V6 Modifications
1661
11/3/22 08:50 PM
Andy11859
Which is Better
4
9/10/15 12:07 PM
MADSCOTSMAN
2010-2014 Mustang
0
7/22/15 04:57 PM



Quick Reply: True Trac vs. Ford Racing T-lok



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:59 AM.