V6 Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang V6 Performance and Technical Information

Today's dyno run...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3/9/06, 04:39 PM
  #61  
Cobra Member
Thread Starter
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 28, 2005
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(The Boss Hog @ March 9, 2006, 6:38 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
John,
I hope you don't mind me jumping in here but, I disagree with you on this point. Your 4.10's cost you a small amount of both torque and hp. This is due to the fact that higher reduction ratio's are inherently more inefficient. If you ignore that small loss, the Dyno could care less what ratio is in there. Your high torque is purely due to your N2O setup.
BTW, nice numbers [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumb.gif[/img] I will make sure I stay away from you.

The Boss Hog
[/b][/quote]

hmmm... but I seem to have a LOT more TQ than the other guys running basically the same exact setup..... ????
Old 3/9/06, 04:53 PM
  #62  
 
rygenstormlocke's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 4, 2005
Posts: 1,856
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(scrming @ March 9, 2006, 6:42 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
hmmm... but I seem to have a LOT more TQ than the other guys running basically the same exact setup..... ????
[/b][/quote]


Could it be Lidios automatic tune? I wonder if making it shift barbaric is jacking up the TQ. You, Jimp and I are all autos running on 100HP juice. But all of us have different numbers, though Jimp and I are similiar.
Old 3/9/06, 05:07 PM
  #63  
Member
 
SPARTAN VI's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 26, 2006
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Fazm @ March 8, 2006, 5:07 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>With just an intake and tune i ran a 14.73 with my 5 speed manaul. With the auto id say maybe a 14.9 or a 15.0 would be a good run.
[/b][/quote]

Hmmm... Referring to Scrming's pre-Zex era, he was running 14.922 with 265/60/16 tires, MMR intake, Lidio's tune, 4.10, and T-Lok. I'm not certain if the 4.10, T-Lok and bigger wheels helped him at all, but I know when he jumped to the C&L he got a little better response. Wish it was comparable, but added altnernator pulleys before he switched intake..

I was hoping at least 14.9.. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/icon_mrgreen.gif[/img]
Old 3/9/06, 05:33 PM
  #64  
Cobra Member
Thread Starter
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 28, 2005
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(rygenstormlocke @ March 9, 2006, 6:56 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Could it be Lidios automatic tune? I wonder if making it shift barbaric is jacking up the TQ. You, Jimp and I are all autos running on 100HP juice. But all of us have different numbers, though Jimp and I are similiar.
[/b][/quote]


Well, the pull is in 4th gear only.... so the shifting has nothing to do with it.... I guess there could be some torque management stuff left in your tune.... Time to come to Michigan!!!! LOL!
Old 3/9/06, 05:33 PM
  #65  
Mach 1 Member
 
The Boss Hog's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 21, 2004
Posts: 681
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(scrming @ March 9, 2006, 6:42 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
hmmm... but I seem to have a LOT more TQ than the other guys running basically the same exact setup..... ????
[/b][/quote]

John,
I agree that your numbers seam high, but your 4.10's have nothing to do with it. If you take a stock vehicle and just add 4.10's the RWTQ as displayed on the Dyno's display will slightly decrease. I bolded part of that statement because the actual torque applied to the ground by your tire at a given mph in a given gear will of course increase by about 24% (4.10/3.31).

The Boss Hog


Short explanation of an Inertial Dyno:
1. Your car accelerates the Dyno's drum
2. Dyno measures that acceleration of its drum
3. Computer calculates hp from RI of drum and Acceleration of drum
4. Computer calculates torque from hp and rpm of engine
Old 3/9/06, 05:34 PM
  #66  
Cobra Member
Thread Starter
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 28, 2005
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(SPARTAN VI @ March 9, 2006, 7:10 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Hmmm... Referring to Scrming's pre-Zex era, he was running 14.922 with 265/60/16 tires, MMR intake, Lidio's tune, 4.10, and T-Lok. I'm not certain if the 4.10, T-Lok and bigger wheels helped him at all, but I know when he jumped to the C&L he got a little better response. Wish it was comparable, but added altnernator pulleys before he switched intake..

I was hoping at least 14.9.. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/icon_mrgreen.gif[/img]
[/b][/quote]


Those tire were HUGE!!! They were like 28.5" tall! LOL! They looked good but were killing my performance...
Old 3/9/06, 05:44 PM
  #67  
 
rygenstormlocke's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 4, 2005
Posts: 1,856
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(scrming @ March 9, 2006, 7:36 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Well, the pull is in 4th gear only.... so the shifting has nothing to do with it.... I guess there could be some torque management stuff left in your tune.... Time to come to Michigan!!!! LOL!
[/b][/quote]


You know its on my to do list. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/smile.gif[/img]
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Road_Runner
5.0L GT Modifications
64
7/21/16 09:14 AM
JTB
Motorsports
1
9/3/15 10:50 AM
The01Cav
Mid-Atlantic
0
8/31/15 03:14 PM
Ponywars
Northeast
2
8/14/15 08:14 PM
SilverBullet13
2010-2014 Mustang
7
8/13/15 09:11 AM



Quick Reply: Today's dyno run...



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:24 AM.