ProCharger video
Thread Starter
Shelby GT350 Member
Joined: April 29, 2005
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 5
On an 05 GT. I'm sure it makes gobs of power but it's LOUD!
F1 ProCharger
I wish I could remember the url of the pre-05 V6 ProCharger video. I'm not saying don't get one. They are just LOUD!
F1 ProCharger
I wish I could remember the url of the pre-05 V6 ProCharger video. I'm not saying don't get one. They are just LOUD!
Bullitt Member
Joined: September 26, 2005
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Jimp Procharger make’s 4 models F, D, P600B the F series is their competition charger 500-2300HP. The one for the 4.0 is the (diff design than the F series) P series which they state “ P-1SC Quiet operation†per Procharger.
I am at this time leaning towards the Procharger. The X charger could be in the running if my thinking is correct. I am thinking due to the new design of the improved MP 90 having a redesigned and larger inlet, forced air also set at a lower RPM per bigger blades should mean cooler charged air going in than the old P 90. This is not including other improvements they made, now Doug seems to get around 200 HP per his Tune out of the 4.0’s. So if we add a X-charger new MP 90 and we know from their site the old one put out about 75 HP. I would think and hope the new one would be close to 275-300 HP with no intercooler, no intercooler air to water, no oil line tap and on 6 Psi and of course looks good sitting on the engine. The one question I would like to know is that 75HP on the old M 62 at the rear wheels or are they talking flywheel HP I would think rear wheels.
Thanks for posting that link, if you find the 4.0 link I liked to see it
I am at this time leaning towards the Procharger. The X charger could be in the running if my thinking is correct. I am thinking due to the new design of the improved MP 90 having a redesigned and larger inlet, forced air also set at a lower RPM per bigger blades should mean cooler charged air going in than the old P 90. This is not including other improvements they made, now Doug seems to get around 200 HP per his Tune out of the 4.0’s. So if we add a X-charger new MP 90 and we know from their site the old one put out about 75 HP. I would think and hope the new one would be close to 275-300 HP with no intercooler, no intercooler air to water, no oil line tap and on 6 Psi and of course looks good sitting on the engine. The one question I would like to know is that 75HP on the old M 62 at the rear wheels or are they talking flywheel HP I would think rear wheels.
Thanks for posting that link, if you find the 4.0 link I liked to see it
Thread Starter
Shelby GT350 Member
Joined: April 29, 2005
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 5
Originally posted by TJ06@December 21, 2005, 5:46 PM
Jimp Procharger make’s 4 models F, D, P600B the F series is their competition charger 500-2300HP. The one for the 4.0 is the (diff design than the F series) P series which they state “ P-1SC Quiet operation†per Procharger.
I am at this time leaning towards the Procharger. The X charger could be in the running if my thinking is correct. I am thinking due to the new design of the improved MP 90 having a redesigned and larger inlet, forced air also set at a lower RPM per bigger blades should mean cooler charged air going in than the old P 90. This is not including other improvements they made, now Doug seems to get around 200 HP per his Tune out of the 4.0’s. So if we add a X-charger new MP 90 and we know from their site the old one put out about 75 HP. I would think and hope the new one would be close to 275-300 HP with no intercooler, no intercooler air to water, no oil line tap and on 6 Psi and of course looks good sitting on the engine. The one question I would like to know is that 75HP at the rear wheels or are they talking flywheel HP.
Thanks for posting that link, if you find the 4.0 link I liked to see it
Jimp Procharger make’s 4 models F, D, P600B the F series is their competition charger 500-2300HP. The one for the 4.0 is the (diff design than the F series) P series which they state “ P-1SC Quiet operation†per Procharger.
I am at this time leaning towards the Procharger. The X charger could be in the running if my thinking is correct. I am thinking due to the new design of the improved MP 90 having a redesigned and larger inlet, forced air also set at a lower RPM per bigger blades should mean cooler charged air going in than the old P 90. This is not including other improvements they made, now Doug seems to get around 200 HP per his Tune out of the 4.0’s. So if we add a X-charger new MP 90 and we know from their site the old one put out about 75 HP. I would think and hope the new one would be close to 275-300 HP with no intercooler, no intercooler air to water, no oil line tap and on 6 Psi and of course looks good sitting on the engine. The one question I would like to know is that 75HP at the rear wheels or are they talking flywheel HP.
Thanks for posting that link, if you find the 4.0 link I liked to see it
V6 Member
Joined: October 20, 2004
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Well, pretty much the procharger is awesome, but the company is not.
Basically, even the 7 PSI kit needs the injectors. That's what we've been fighting all along. 19lb injectors are pretty well maxed out with a kit putting 300 horsepower to the rear wheels... it just can't stay rich enough. However, procharger is loathe to admit this because there goes their number one justification for charging $200-$300 more for their 9 PSI kit.
The install isn't done, I've been on vacation (writing this from Mexico) but will update when I get back.
It's still an awesome kit, with an excellent head unit and good solid construction, but you might need a little more work than they claim when you put it in.
More to come.
Basically, even the 7 PSI kit needs the injectors. That's what we've been fighting all along. 19lb injectors are pretty well maxed out with a kit putting 300 horsepower to the rear wheels... it just can't stay rich enough. However, procharger is loathe to admit this because there goes their number one justification for charging $200-$300 more for their 9 PSI kit.
The install isn't done, I've been on vacation (writing this from Mexico) but will update when I get back.
It's still an awesome kit, with an excellent head unit and good solid construction, but you might need a little more work than they claim when you put it in.
More to come.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
Sep 24, 2015 08:15 PM
