V6 Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang V6 Performance and Technical Information

MUSTANG V6 VS. NEW ECLIPSE GT AWD

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 5/23/05 | 08:28 PM
  #21  
Fazm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 21, 2004
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
Doesn't the 210hp auto V6 Mustang do 0-60 in 6.9? And, the Eclipse GT's price is more in line with a Mustang GT deluxe. If Edmunds didn't have a typo, the V6 Mustang and Eclipese GT match up pretty well.
Yes, and with my gtech i have hit as good as 6.35 in my 5 speed v6.

There also reports of the new eclipse having as high as a 10.5:1 compression ratio, which will limit boost to bout 4-5psi, if the pistons can even hold up to that (mitsu's have horrible piston/ring problems)
Old 5/23/05 | 09:14 PM
  #22  
Lalo's Avatar
I'm people, and I like.
 
Joined: March 13, 2004
Posts: 9,242
Likes: 0
From: PDX
Bottom Line: For the money the Eclipse costs, it's worthless.
Buy a V6 Mustang. With the money saved up from not buying the Eclipse GT, add some mods, and make it go faster than the Eclipse GT
Old 5/23/05 | 10:31 PM
  #23  
Fazm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 21, 2004
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
If the eclipse gt was startin at under 20k, then id say its worth it. But i paid 19,910 +ttl for my mustang (3k off) and with another 4-5k i could easily be runnin low 13's
Old 5/24/05 | 10:50 PM
  #24  
Tone's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
There still seems to be some confusion here about the Eclipse. The new model is not AWD, it's FWD as another poster mentioned. It also is not turbocharged, it's a normally aspirated 3.8 litre V6.

I too have scanned the Road and Track test with the 5.8 0-60 time, which seems about right for the power and weight. That would put it somewhere between the V6 Mustang and the GT, and it's priced between the two cars as well.
Old 5/25/05 | 12:54 AM
  #25  
Fazm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 21, 2004
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
Its actually priced the the same as the mustang gt, 1k lower in starting base price. 4,500 higher than a base v6 mustang.

The FWD i pointed out earlier, that confusion was taking care of. Nobody claimed it to be turbocharged though, so i dont know where that came from.

If you gave me half of what the difference cost (lets call it less than half, 2k) i could be running high 5's int he 60 if not mid 5's, which would make me faster than an eclipse.... not to mention.. you would have to drive that hideous thing (am i the only one that think it looks very odd?)
Old 5/25/05 | 08:44 AM
  #26  
Tone's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
I thought your post:

"There also reports of the new eclipse having as high as a 10.5:1 compression ratio, which will limit boost to bout 4-5psi, if the pistons can even hold up to that (mitsu's have horrible piston/ring problems)"

implied that you believed the current Mistu was turbocharged. Perhaps you were referring to its modibility.
Old 5/25/05 | 09:16 AM
  #27  
Fazm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 21, 2004
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
Yes, that was referring to an aftermarket turbo.
Old 5/28/05 | 07:24 AM
  #28  
Ballz's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: August 18, 2004
Posts: 586
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, FL
I have to say this. That new Eclipse is freaking ugly!!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mark0006
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
15
9/8/23 10:46 AM
Andy11859
Which is Better
4
9/10/15 01:07 PM
carid
Vendor Showcase
0
7/20/15 07:26 AM
dohc97
2010-2014 Mustang
2
7/19/15 08:29 PM
carid
Vendor Showcase
3
7/17/15 06:40 PM



Quick Reply: MUSTANG V6 VS. NEW ECLIPSE GT AWD



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:19 AM.