V6 Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang V6 Performance and Technical Information

6.13 Seconds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4/2/07, 10:17 AM
  #1  
Team Mustang Source
Thread Starter
 
Pitch Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 9, 2005
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
6.13 Seconds

Well, I own a 2005 Mustang v6 (Black Premium)
Current Modificaitons:
  • K&N Air Filter
  • BrenSpeed 93 Tune
  • Flowmaster A/T Dual Exhaust with 2 1/4inch pipe
Everything else is stock and i got the nerve to clock my 0-60... 6.13secs is what i was pushing... A Stock v6 is suppose to push 6.9 secs?

I'm overall happy with my car... What would some Future mods be that would dramatically increase performance?...I'm taking baby steps to making my car a sleeper..
Old 4/2/07, 04:26 PM
  #2  
Bullitt Member
 
chrisc9867's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 5, 2006
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the 0-60 for the stock cars is not actually 6.9.....infact, it was recently measured by some magazine (not a mustang mag either....like a Sport Compact type mag) to do it in 6.3

the biggest thing you could do is to f/i your car. if you dont like that, you can go for an agressive gearing, LSD, and pullies
Old 4/2/07, 04:33 PM
  #3  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Cavero's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Posts: 2,490
Received 128 Likes on 101 Posts
that's a pretty **** good improvement. like chris is sayin, without forced induction, i don't know how much more power your going to be able to make without doing major engine mods (cams, heads, etc) besides the usual intake and exhaust mods. But with turbos or an s/c you'd have to beef up your internals anyway.
Old 4/2/07, 08:24 PM
  #4  
Bullitt Member
 
chrisc9867's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 5, 2006
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
not really, if you stay at a reasonable boost you can get (depending on the f/i unit) between around 270-360rwhp
Old 4/2/07, 10:58 PM
  #5  
Legacy TMS Member
 
unnoticedtrails's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 27, 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5,450
Received 57 Likes on 46 Posts
what does a stock V6 with auto do?
Old 4/3/07, 09:40 PM
  #6  
Team Mustang Source
Thread Starter
 
Pitch Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 9, 2005
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
well lol.. the Auto Does what 6.13..... I kinda forgot to mention that Part.. I have an Auto ... kinda forgot that factor
Old 4/3/07, 11:25 PM
  #7  
Cobra R Member
 
DynamicmustangGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 12, 2007
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chrisc9867
not really, if you stay at a reasonable boost you can get (depending on the f/i unit) between around 270-360rwhp
i wouldn't recommend that on stock 6cyc internals though
Old 4/3/07, 11:43 PM
  #8  
Team Mustang Source
Thread Starter
 
Pitch Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 9, 2005
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I heard stock they can handle 400rwhp... i mean with a new rear end
Old 4/4/07, 03:24 AM
  #9  
Cobra Member
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 28, 2005
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DynamicmustangGT
i wouldn't recommend that on stock 6cyc internals though
Why? I've got over 20,000 miles at 300+ RWHP...
Old 4/4/07, 03:47 AM
  #10  
MSP
Banned
 
MSP's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 19, 2005
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DynamicmustangGT
i wouldn't recommend that on stock 6cyc internals though

And I have been daily driving with a 14psi pulley for quite sometime.. 355RWHP...

Its possible you may need to do alittle catch up on the S197 V6's.. They are alot beefier than you think.. Actually, they can handle more boost than a stock 3V 4.6L..

Ever heard of someone who owns a GT, which took the motor to 23psi and the motor lived to produce a readable dynosheet? The GT should be able to maintain 450RWHP as a daily driver no problem however.. So its still a great motor.. I dont know about you but 450RWHP is really all you need in my opinion..

Whenever you think of the S197 V6, understand that it has been to 23psi and back.. Safley..
Old 4/4/07, 07:14 PM
  #11  
Cobra R Member
 
DynamicmustangGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 12, 2007
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I didnt say it hadn't and I am not ranking on the 6cyl, I think its a great option for the stang. I just said I wouldn't recommend it. I am not saying the v8 is better at handling boost either. I'm a little worried about adding boost to my 4.6. It's more of a longevity thing to me. In NE for the most part 450rwhp is too much for most people. These roads are awful. I guess its however long you want to keep your car. I would turn green if my car had a 4-5000 turbo/supercharger on it and the block was worth nothing after I blew a hole in it, or a rod went through it.
Old 4/4/07, 07:15 PM
  #12  
Cobra R Member
 
DynamicmustangGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 12, 2007
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In other words I am not against the 6's or the 8's being blown but would rather see "safer" mods done to them personally, unless the internals were replaced.
Old 4/4/07, 07:28 PM
  #13  
Cobra Member
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 28, 2005
Posts: 1,163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DynamicmustangGT
In other words I am not against the 6's or the 8's being blown but would rather see "safer" mods done to them personally, unless the internals were replaced.
which of course is just your personal opinion... no solid facts to back it up.. just your feeling... ok...
Old 4/4/07, 09:17 PM
  #14  
Cobra R Member
 
DynamicmustangGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 12, 2007
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
exactly i dint mean to argue or anything
Old 4/4/07, 09:24 PM
  #15  
Member
 
Buckman's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 9, 2006
Posts: 38
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I didnt say it hadn't and I am not ranking on the 6cyl, I think its a great option for the stang. I just said I wouldn't recommend it. I am not saying the v8 is better at handling boost either. I'm a little worried about adding boost to my 4.6. It's more of a longevity thing to me. In NE for the most part 450rwhp is too much for most people. These roads are awful. I guess its however long you want to keep your car. I would turn green if my car had a 4-5000 turbo/supercharger on it and the block was worth nothing after I blew a hole in it, or a rod went through it.
I think it all boils down to detonation. Avoid that and this engine will continue to perform for a long time. Of course the key to avoiding detonation is to get a trusted tuner to work on your car.
Old 4/4/07, 09:58 PM
  #16  
Cobra R Member
 
DynamicmustangGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 12, 2007
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
trust is my whole prob. i dont trust anyone with that car but me
Old 4/5/07, 09:05 PM
  #17  
Team Mustang Source
Thread Starter
 
Pitch Black's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 9, 2005
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by DynamicmustangGT
trust is my whole prob. i dont trust anyone with that car but me
hmm I have the same problem...
Old 4/11/07, 02:16 PM
  #18  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Cavero's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 13, 2006
Posts: 2,490
Received 128 Likes on 101 Posts
Originally Posted by MSP
And I have been daily driving with a 14psi pulley for quite sometime.. 355RWHP...

Its possible you may need to do alittle catch up on the S197 V6's.. They are alot beefier than you think.. Actually, they can handle more boost than a stock 3V 4.6L..

Ever heard of someone who owns a GT, which took the motor to 23psi and the motor lived to produce a readable dynosheet? The GT should be able to maintain 450RWHP as a daily driver no problem however.. So its still a great motor.. I dont know about you but 450RWHP is really all you need in my opinion..

Whenever you think of the S197 V6, understand that it has been to 23psi and back.. Safley..
Doesn't surprise me I guess. The V6 is basically a truck engine.
Old 4/11/07, 02:57 PM
  #19  
GT Member
 
swissdan's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 10, 2005
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Motor Trend tested the V6 Vert with 0-60 in 7.3 seconds!!! other mags in 6.9

6.13 is very good
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CiniZter
General Vehicle Discussion/News
25
4/28/16 05:41 PM
Evil_Capri
Ford Discussions
4
10/14/15 12:18 PM
Antigini-GT/CS
2005-2009 Mustang
5
10/5/15 09:43 AM
tacbear
Mustang Motorsports
0
9/27/15 12:57 PM
Mustang65bob
Introductions
1
9/21/15 11:30 AM



Quick Reply: 6.13 Seconds



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:58 PM.