GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Yet another satisfied BamaChips customer!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 08:21 AM
  #1  
Louie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: April 7, 2005
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 0
From: Holland
First of all, I have to thank Doug for taking my XCal2 from Holland and shipping it back to me, and installing a 95 octane performance tune and a 95 octane torque tune on it.

I just picked up the UPS package an hour ago and reflashed the ECU with the performance tune. The difference in throttle response and the acceleration from a stop are so much improved, that it feels like a different car! In fact, I feel like I'm going to have to re-learn how to drive it, especially in stop-and-go traffic jams. I spun the tires in 1st and 2nd gear already, without much effort (read no WOT yet, just TC off).
I haven't tried the torque tune yet (will do it later today), but I'm already sure I will manage to chirp the tires in 3rd gear too. Man, I can't wait to get off work and test the car tonight!

Those of you who already have Doug's tunes installed, you know what I'm talking about and why I'm so excited. To the others: I strongly recommend giving the XCal2 and Doug's tunes a try!
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 08:32 AM
  #2  
nvader's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: December 30, 2005
Posts: 123
Likes: 0
Congrats, Doug does great work!! [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumb.gif[/img]
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 09:33 AM
  #3  
Lowe!'s Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 18, 2004
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
I couldn't imagine 95 octane [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/eek.gif[/img]
Both the price at the pump and the increased performance.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 09:40 AM
  #4  
Louie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: April 7, 2005
Posts: 1,452
Likes: 0
From: Holland
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Lowe! @ April 25, 2006, 5:36 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
I couldn't imagine 95 octane [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/eek.gif[/img]
Both the price at the pump and the increased performance.
[/b][/quote]

That's 95 RON, the European equivalent of US 93 octane.
The fuel price here is 1.45 EURO/litre (~ 6.5 $/gallon), I just filled up today at BP.
However, I knew what I was getting into when I ordered my car, and fuel economy was never a deal-breaker for me when I made my decision.
The increased SOTP performance is very noticeable, indeed! [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/thumb.gif[/img]
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 09:50 AM
  #5  
Lowe!'s Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 18, 2004
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Ahhh. You learn something new everyday. Today's lesson, go order a tuner/CAI package from Bamachips.

And I thought $3.00 a gallon was bad. But like you said, if I was concerned w/ gas milage/prices, I'd a bought a Civic.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 12:06 PM
  #6  
emperorjordan's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: February 14, 2005
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
yeah, gas is really good over there, but even tho the RON 95 gas is equiv to our 93, I think it is a higher quality still. Our gas sucks over here.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 04:20 PM
  #7  
70MACH1OWNER's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 9, 2005
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 6
From: New Carlisle, Ohio (20 miles north of Dayton)
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(emperorjordan @ April 25, 2006, 1:09 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
yeah, gas is really good over there, but even tho the RON 95 gas is equiv to our 93, I think it is a higher quality still. Our gas sucks over here.
[/b][/quote]



I'm sure I will never understand why all you guys out west can only get 91 octane fuel. California hotrods more cars per capita than any other state but they get some of the worst gas. Here in Ohio we can get 94 octane if we could afford it. Why is that. My stang is the same as the one you buy out west. Makes no sense to me.
Scott [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dunno.gif[/img]

P.S. $6.50/ gallon could be in our future if all the crap going on in the world go wrong.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 04:30 PM
  #8  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(70MACH1OWNER @ April 25, 2006, 3:23 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
I'm sure I will never understand why all you guys out west can only get 91 octane fuel. California hotrods more cars per capita than any other state but they get some of the worst gas. Here in Ohio we can get 94 octane if we could afford it. Why is that. My stang is the same as the one you buy out west. Makes no sense to me.
Scott [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/dunno.gif[/img]
[/b][/quote]

Two words: "Tree Huggers" [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/banghead.gif[/img]
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 04:36 PM
  #9  
70MACH1OWNER's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 9, 2005
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 6
From: New Carlisle, Ohio (20 miles north of Dayton)
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(don_w @ April 25, 2006, 5:33 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Two words: "Tree Huggers" [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/banghead.gif[/img]
[/b][/quote]


Sooooo, is 93 octane more polluting than 91?
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 04:40 PM
  #10  
SixtySix's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,153
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(don_w @ April 25, 2006, 3:33 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Two words: "Tree Huggers" [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/banghead.gif[/img]
[/b][/quote]


But I have no trees to hug in the Aridzona desert! Hugging a cactus isn't much fun [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrinjester.gif[/img]
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 04:45 PM
  #11  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(70MACH1OWNER @ April 25, 2006, 3:39 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Sooooo, is 93 octane more polluting than 91?
[/b][/quote]
Ask the fuggin tree huggers... [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/nonono.gif[/img]
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 04:58 PM
  #12  
70MACH1OWNER's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 9, 2005
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 6
From: New Carlisle, Ohio (20 miles north of Dayton)
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(don_w @ April 25, 2006, 5:48 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Ask the fuggin tree huggers... [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/nonono.gif[/img]
[/b][/quote]


Don,
Figgin tree huggers is 3 words. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrinjester.gif[/img]
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 04:59 PM
  #13  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(70MACH1OWNER @ April 25, 2006, 4:01 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Don,
Figgin tree huggers is 3 words. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrinjester.gif[/img]
[/b][/quote]


OK...

... muthafuggin treehuggers...

Is that 2 words? [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/lol.gif[/img]
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2006 | 05:04 PM
  #14  
70MACH1OWNER's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 9, 2005
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 6
From: New Carlisle, Ohio (20 miles north of Dayton)
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(don_w @ April 25, 2006, 6:02 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
OK...

... muthafuggin treehuggers...

Is that 2 words? [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/lol.gif[/img]
[/b][/quote]


Yes, you are now technically correct. [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrinjester.gif[/img]
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2006 | 06:49 AM
  #15  
lodom's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 11, 2004
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
I had never thought about the reason before, but the extra 2 points in octane (93 vs. 91) has a greater potential to incompletely burn, since octane slows down the burn rate of fuel. @#$@ tree huggers!
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2006 | 11:19 PM
  #16  
emperorjordan's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: February 14, 2005
Posts: 980
Likes: 0
yeah, i dont know why we are stuck with 91, but it has to do with the "muthafuggin treehuggers"®
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2006 | 11:37 PM
  #17  
bpmurr's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: October 13, 2004
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
From: MD
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Louie @ April 25, 2006, 10:24 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
First of all, I have to thank Doug for taking my XCal2 from Holland and shipping it back to me, and installing a 95 octane performance tune and a 95 octane torque tune on it.

I just picked up the UPS package an hour ago and reflashed the ECU with the performance tune. The difference in throttle response and the acceleration from a stop are so much improved, that it feels like a different car! In fact, I feel like I'm going to have to re-learn how to drive it, especially in stop-and-go traffic jams. I spun the tires in 1st and 2nd gear already, without much effort (read no WOT yet, just TC off).
I haven't tried the torque tune yet (will do it later today), but I'm already sure I will manage to chirp the tires in 3rd gear too. Man, I can't wait to get off work and test the car tonight!

Those of you who already have Doug's tunes installed, you know what I'm talking about and why I'm so excited. To the others: I strongly recommend giving the XCal2 and Doug's tunes a try!
[/b][/quote]

Don't forget to get your car to the Dyno sometime soon. My 93 Torque tune was pretty close to on the money. My 93 Performance Tune was not so hot but Doug corrected it as soon as I sent him my graphs.

On a side note I just hit 1000 posts again [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif[/img] Server Crashes -Grrrrr
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 09:01 AM
  #18  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(emperorjordan @ April 26, 2006, 10:22 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
yeah, i dont know why we are stuck with 91, but it has to do with the "muthafuggin treehuggers"®
[/b][/quote]


<snicker>
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mrp5150
SN95 Mustang
4
Aug 23, 2015 06:29 AM
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
Jul 30, 2015 06:47 AM
carid
Vendor Showcase
0
Jul 20, 2015 06:26 AM
Doug@C&L
V6 Performance Mods
2
Aug 10, 2005 11:07 PM
Firedude
GT Performance Mods
2
Jul 30, 2005 02:04 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:12 PM.