GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

XCal2 with no mods - worthwhile?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 08:03 PM
  #1  
dzcues's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: August 17, 2005
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
In the interests of those wishing to keep everything bone-stock on their GTs, I have a question that I haven't seen asked yet:

Has anyone tried dyno testing their car with absolutely no modifications except adjusting parameters with an XCal2?

How much benefit can be realized by simply tweaking the factory setup? Any HP improvements? Any torque improvements?

Can the throttle response problem be corrected by this manner alone? (I'm especially interested in the answer to this question.)

Please don't bother extolling the virtues of a simple CAI installation...this is a legitimate request to explore the improvements possible with NO add-ons.

There are so many different outcomes posted with the variety of CAIs and different tunes available that I thought a baseline test of the stock components would have been touched on here. If it has, I can't find it.

Thanks.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 08:08 PM
  #2  
ryan1112's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: October 14, 2004
Posts: 738
Likes: 1
From: Dayton, OH
I tried it with no mods just to check. I got 8 hp with a 93 octane tune. Even if you have no mods its worth it. You have so many other adjustments like rev limiter, traction control on\off, idle RPM, etc... I really think its a worthwhile investment.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 08:11 PM
  #3  
SixtySix's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,153
Likes: 0
I don't think you could EVER go wrong with getting a tuner, even if you do nothing else.

I ran that way for quite some time and I was happy with it. Didn't get a dyno though, it's against my religion to throw money away
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 09:04 PM
  #4  
AFBLUE's Avatar
Dethroned Nascar Guru
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 2
According to the CAI test in the Jan 06 5.0 magazine:

Stock with hydrocarbon trap 255 rwhp
Stock with HC trap removed 261 rwhp
Stock with 91 octane SCT tune was 271 rwhp (unclear from article if this was with or without the the HC trap)

So that's a 10-15 hp gain.

I'm not the most tech savy so forgive me if I have misinterepted the 5.0 article
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 09:10 PM
  #5  
nicksolheim's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 17, 2004
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
I have the Diablosport predator.

I ran the 91 octane tune alone for about a week, didn't get a dyno, but I could definitely feel a pretty good gain. The new shift points alone were awesome.

I know it's not SCT, but I imagine they are about the same.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 05:07 AM
  #6  
dzcues's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: August 17, 2005
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Thanks, guys. That's about what I expected (and hoped) to hear.

But, again, did the tune alone help with the throttle response?
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:09 PM
  #7  
JB10's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: January 11, 2005
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
sure did.... worth it!
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2006 | 12:30 PM
  #8  
adrenalin's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: May 26, 2004
Posts: 10,605
Likes: 2
Yup, noticed a difference before I added anything else. Definately worth it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TripleBlack14
General Mustang Chat
6
May 10, 2016 04:30 AM
Bryanh24
5.0L GT Modifications
14
Oct 14, 2015 08:43 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:42 AM.