GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

very happy with the dyno!!!

Old Aug 16, 2006 | 05:59 PM
  #1  
maxrev's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: April 15, 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
very happy with the dyno!!!

last time i posted my numbers, it was on a mustang dyno (308whp and dont remember the torque). Now i pass it on a dynojet just to see the result and the result is great. I did`t have the dynosheet from the mustang dyno but a have this one. so here is the result: 343whp and 340wtq . i`m really please.
Attached Images  
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 06:00 PM
  #2  
jayguy's Avatar
Team Mustang Source Legacy Member
 
Joined: September 2, 2004
Posts: 1,679
Likes: 5
From: Las Vegas
Ok, now we all want to know what your mods are.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 06:06 PM
  #3  
maxrev's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: April 15, 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
ok here is the mods: predator, afe intake, 4.10, magnapak catback, hooker long tubes, offroad x-pipe, fidanza clutch flywheel, dcmp steeda, udp steeda, canton oil tray
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 06:13 PM
  #4  
Burke0011's Avatar
Big Falken Tires
 
Joined: October 17, 2004
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 1
Doesn't the dynojet read higher in general becauser it doesn't take into account the weight of the car, etc?......
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 06:15 PM
  #5  
maxrev's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: April 15, 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
yes i was just curious to see the diff so i`m guessing 10-12% higher on a dynojet
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 12:08 PM
  #6  
traffic142's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: July 21, 2005
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 0
what is dcmp steeda? and where did you find a canton oil tray?

Similar mods as mine. Good numbers.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 01:17 PM
  #7  
2006GT500's Avatar
 
Joined: February 2, 2006
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
I'm not thinking your making that much power. No one with your same mods has made that kinda of power yet. If you truly are then congrats but something seems off. Did they give you the SAE corrected numbers?
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 01:19 PM
  #8  
Cleveland's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 20, 2005
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 0
now hold on, the dyno wasnt configured properly so dont ride those numbers, they arent worth anything...even on a dynojet

-Dan
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 01:35 PM
  #9  
tom281's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: October 8, 2005
Posts: 12,395
Likes: 29
From: Medina county, OH
Sounds like it was tested on BBR's dyno........
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 04:28 PM
  #10  
2006GT500's Avatar
 
Joined: February 2, 2006
Posts: 1,405
Likes: 0
It looks like the smoothing is way off.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 04:53 PM
  #11  
Hatchman's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: May 17, 2005
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 1
From: Chesapeake, VA
Originally Posted by maxrev
ok here is the mods: predator, afe intake, 4.10, magnapak catback, hooker long tubes, offroad x-pipe, fidanza clutch flywheel, dcmp steeda, udp steeda, canton oil tray
Seems a bit high to me. Nobody else with those mods is making anywhere near that. The 4.10's should be killing your dyno readings.

Allow me to pull some numbers out of my ***...

Let's say 270 stock ( I've seen as low as 258) plus
pred/intake 28 (highest I have heard is 27)
catback 2 (the most I have heard is 1.5)
offroad x 10 (mine gave me 6hp)
long tubes 10 (maybe)
UDP 10 (maybe)
dcmp's 5 (give or take)
flywheel 5 (give or take)
4.10's -20 to -30 (I've seen more like a 10% drop)
Should be around the 310-315 range.

Still, nice set of mods, and the dyno isn't a measure of how fast your car is, just a tuning device.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 06:10 PM
  #12  
FireFighterHill's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 27, 2005
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Those mods MIGHT give you 340 at the crank not the wheels
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 06:56 PM
  #13  
maxrev's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: April 15, 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
I don`t know guys but i`v always heard that dynojet read 10% higher so 308whp on a mustang dyno + 10% = 338whp close to my 343 and the weather was 70 degrees compare to the 85degrees for the mustangdyno. I have some tracktimes maybe you can tell with that 12.58 at 11.81mph. the main point is that the car run good and i can really feel the power.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 07:06 PM
  #14  
maxrev's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: April 15, 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
[quote=maxrev]I don`t know guys but i`v always heard that dynojet read 10% higher so 308whp on a mustang dyno + 10% = 338whp close to my 343 and the weather was 70 degrees compare to the 85degrees for the mustangdyno. I have some tracktimes maybe you can tell with that 12.58 at 111.81mph. the main point is that the car run good and i can really feel the power.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 07:15 PM
  #15  
maxrev's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: April 15, 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
it was at a mustang show and a couple of stock passed all between 250 and 260whp . it seem ok to me . in the right corner of my dynosheet i can read sae corrected. on the same dyno last year at the same show i was at 288whp with intake,pulley,predator and 4.10. And i don`t think you loose 20-30hp with the 4.10 but more like 7-8.Maybe you are right and something was wrong but i can assure you that the car push hard.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 01:10 AM
  #16  
2006VistaBlueGT's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: August 5, 2006
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Is there anyway you could post a bigger pic of the dynosheet?
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 11:22 AM
  #17  
BlackonBlack's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: January 16, 2006
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by tom281
Sounds like it was tested on BBR's dyno........
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 11:34 AM
  #18  
maxrev's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: April 15, 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
is it better.....
Attached Thumbnails very happy with the dyno!!!-num-riser.jpg  
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 02:26 PM
  #19  
blackened's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: July 6, 2005
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by maxrev
12.58 at 111.81mph.
that's smokin. still i can't see the power from just those mods unless you just have a truly freaky s197. do you have a timeslip you can scan and post?
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 04:22 PM
  #20  
maxrev's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: April 15, 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
sorry i don`t have it. that was funny because most of the times 12.8...is my time but the 12.58 was against a mustang 05 with a paxton novi2200 the one from the shop who put all my stuff. it have 522whp and only run .2 faster than me but usualy he do 11.8 hi hi hi
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Road_Runner
5.0L GT Modifications
67
Sep 2, 2024 04:46 PM
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
Sep 24, 2015 08:15 PM
samjluck
5.0L GT Modifications
7
Sep 17, 2015 10:24 PM
JTB
Motorsports
1
Sep 3, 2015 10:50 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:33 AM.