GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Throttle Body?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 08:13 PM
  #1  
steal101's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 14, 2004
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
What are the pro and cons to upgrading from stock? :scratch: Thanks!
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 08:52 PM
  #2  
Greywolf's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: July 4, 2004
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Con price. Pro supposedly better throttle response and a small increase in hp. If the car has a power adder it might do even better.
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2005 | 10:25 PM
  #3  
KWMJ-KTP's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 12, 2005
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Originally posted by steal101@September 22, 2005, 10:16 PM
What are the pro and cons to upgrading from stock? :scratch: Thanks!
When Muscle Mustang & Fast Ford, in their current issue, tested the upcoming twin-62mm BBK TB, they reported a dyno increase of 16.3 Horsepower and 28.1 Ft. Lb. Torque.

They also tested the TB in combination with the upcoming BBK Cold-Air Kit. The two items together posted a gain of 27.2 Horsepower and 37.8 Ft. Lb. Torque without any reflashing.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 09:51 AM
  #4  
steal101's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 14, 2004
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Sounds like more pro than con. Thanks!
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 09:57 AM
  #5  
dustindu4's Avatar
9 is not my lucky number.
 
Joined: March 12, 2004
Posts: 3,663
Likes: 1
Originally posted by KWMJ-KTP@September 23, 2005, 12:28 AM
They also tested the TB in combination with the upcoming BBK Cold-Air Kit. The two items together posted a gain of 27.2 Horsepower and 37.8 Ft. Lb. Torque without any reflashing.
That's amazing
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 10:07 AM
  #6  
RRRoamer's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: November 27, 2004
Posts: 1,303
Likes: 2
From: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Just be careful. It's ALSO unverified! I hope it's true, but.....
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 10:17 AM
  #7  
Kluski's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 23, 2004
Posts: 2,147
Likes: 9
From: Pittsburgh, PA
I am sure some members on this site will buy them and test them for the rest of us. Sort of our own prooving grounds.
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 12:21 PM
  #8  
KWMJ-KTP's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 12, 2005
Posts: 239
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Kluski@September 23, 2005, 12:20 PM
I am sure some members on this site will buy them and test them for the rest of us. Sort of our own prooving grounds.
The BBK kept getting delayed unfortunately, (mid-Oct. for the CAI & Dec. for the TB), so I decided that I did not want to wait that long and opted for the C&L CAI and the Motoblue twin-62mm Throttle Body sold by RPMOutlet.

However, I will be doing 5 performance mods all at one time, so I won't be able to say just how much power each item added by itself, unfortunately. I would dare say that since BBK supplied the parts to Muscle Mustang & Fast Ford, and MM&FF did the testing themselves, the results they published are probably pretty accurate.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2005 | 11:10 AM
  #9  
Fastback65's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: June 26, 2005
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
I'm only repeating what I have read on this site and my experience from reading weight lifting magaizines, and that is that the publishers of the magazines are "friendly" with their advertizers when it comes to numbers and performance.
Reply
Old Sep 24, 2005 | 12:54 PM
  #10  
clockworks's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: August 7, 2005
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Fastback65@September 24, 2005, 11:13 AM
and my experience from reading weight lifting magaizines, and that is that the publishers of the magazines are "friendly" with their advertizers when it comes to numbers and performance.
The supplement industry is completely out of control. I mean, some of the claims are absolutely ridiculous as are the "before and after" photos.

I am also skeptical of the gains determined by MM&FF, but it's really easy to verify them...just bolt on the two parts to a stock GT. Hopefully you'll get +-5 hp/tq due to ambient weather variables. Contrast that to trying to verify the claims in the bodybuilding mags, where they can say "well your diet/genes/routine/body chemistry/recovery routine/etc/etc affected the outcome of your results." That's really the reason why they can get away with making any claims they want in the realm of supplements.

That's just my opinion. I'm also into the weight lifting thing, so when you made that comparison, it got me thinking.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kponypower
GT
13
Jun 17, 2020 07:17 AM
GLOCKer
General Mustang Chat
2
Sep 28, 2015 05:20 PM
Stephen Laslo
V6
4
Sep 18, 2015 07:57 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:46 AM.