GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Stock 2005 5spd GT dyno numbers inside

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 28, 2004 | 05:03 PM
  #21  
Mustranger's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: September 29, 2004
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Originally posted by lordserb@October 28, 2004, 4:58 PM
So I'm new to the whole tuning thing, so could someone give me the down and dirty explanation of how i could tune up the GT for cheap?
What he said ^^
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2004 | 05:12 PM
  #22  
dave_bought_another_black_stang's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 455
Likes: 0
This car is going to need those 18 inch rims to stay grounded with only slight mods.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2004 | 05:26 PM
  #23  
Greywolf's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: July 4, 2004
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 0
Originally posted by lordserb@October 28, 2004, 4:58 PM
So I'm new to the whole tuning thing, so could someone give me the down and dirty explanation of how i could tune up the GT for cheap?
Can't do it cheap you need software and knowledge and preferablly a dyno
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2004 | 05:29 PM
  #24  
grrr428's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 9, 2004
Posts: 649
Likes: 1
Originally posted by MrMorden@October 28, 2004, 8:58 AM
Sounds like 320rwhp with just a tune, pulleys, X-pipe, and maybe a couple of other bolt-ons.

Thank you Ford Motor Company!
what he said
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2004 | 07:06 PM
  #25  
jm3's Avatar
jm3
Member
 
Joined: July 28, 2004
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
real quick

Tune: maybe some hp, especially with cam timing, but most cars run fat after 30 -40 seconds anyway to prevent problems. Still good afr at anything less than a dyno pull or a high speed run.

Pulleys: Gonna be tough on this car, it can be done, but the crank pulley is huge, and the other pulleys can only physically get so big.

X pipe: The factory 2.5 inch exhaust has an"H" connector only about 4 inches long. you're going to have to be a pretty big believer in x-pipes to notice a difference.

The hp is gonna come from the intake, and it is going to need to be MUCH more clever than just a cone filter and some Taiwan Tubing.

jay
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2004 | 07:30 PM
  #26  
JZInternet's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 26, 2004
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
When they put these cars on the dyno, how consistant are they with each other. For example if you tested 100 new 2005 mustangs would they all be the same hp give or take 1 or 2 horses or does each car vary more than that?

Jason
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2004 | 07:52 PM
  #27  
Evil_Capri's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,160
Likes: 73
Originally posted by JZInternet@October 28, 2004, 9:33 PM
When they put these cars on the dyno, how consistant are they with each other. For example if you tested 100 new 2005 mustangs would they all be the same hp give or take 1 or 2 horses or does each car vary more than that?

Jason
Jason-

Well 2003-2004 Mach's vary from 260's to low-mid 280's hp and there could be as much as a 20lb torque variance as well from ~280's to low 300's.

Mine dyno'd at ~273hp, and ~293 tq. A good SCT flash could gain me as much as ~15-30 hp/tq to the wheels (as stated by Modular Depot), depending on numerous variables including turning "off" my Knock Sensors.

EDIT: I also wanted to add that the variances in Mach numbers is also due to different environmental conditions (Where, Temp, Humid., etc.) just to clarify.
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2004 | 08:54 PM
  #28  
Dan's Avatar
Dan
Do You Remember Me?
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 6,000
Likes: 0
Now, if I were to buy an aftermarket intake, would that void my warranty? Or would they look the other way?

I would like to keep my car almost stock except for:

- exhaust
- rims/tires
- possibly intake

I purchased the 7yr, full milage warranty. I know rims/tires and exhaust are not a big deal, and that reflash will void the warranty, but the intake?
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2004 | 10:12 PM
  #29  
conv_stang's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: March 3, 2004
Posts: 2,634
Likes: 0
From: Richmond VA
im sure the intake will void the warranty. supposedly just the intake elbow and T/B change on the 99-04 GT's ford will try to void your warranty. if you are in good with the dealr and GM and have all the work done there. you might get them to hold up on the warranty
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 09:12 AM
  #30  
JZInternet's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 26, 2004
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Evil_Capri+October 28, 2004, 7:55 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (Evil_Capri @ October 28, 2004, 7:55 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-JZInternet@October 28, 2004, 9:33 PM
When they put these cars on the dyno, how consistant are they with each other. For example if you tested 100 new 2005 mustangs would they all be the same hp give or take 1 or 2 horses or does each car vary more than that?

Jason
Jason-

Well 2003-2004 Mach's vary from 260's to low-mid 280's hp and there could be as much as a 20lb torque variance as well from ~280's to low 300's.

Mine dyno'd at ~273hp, and ~293 tq. A good SCT flash could gain me as much as ~15-30 hp/tq to the wheels (as stated by Modular Depot), depending on numerous variables including turning "off" my Knock Sensors.

EDIT: I also wanted to add that the variances in Mach numbers is also due to different environmental conditions (Where, Temp, Humid., etc.) just to clarify. [/b][/quote]
Wow that's a huge difference. What causes such a wide range of HP? Also did you mean that the mach1 varies more than a stock gt, or do they vary quite a bit too?

Thanks, Jason
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 09:19 AM
  #31  
00StangGT's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
alot depends on how much the engine is broken in and how it's been run.....

if it's been ragged on then it might lose some power and vice versa
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2004 | 10:22 AM
  #32  
Galaxie's Avatar
I Have Admin Envy
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 6,740
Likes: 1
Originally posted by Dan@October 28, 2004, 9:57 PM
I purchased the 7yr, full milage warranty. I know rims/tires and exhaust are not a big deal, and that reflash will void the warranty, but the intake?
Dan, I think it works like this,

with the oiled cotton & gauze filters like the K&N, there is a chance if the filter has some extra oil residue that coats the filament on the MAF sensor wire. If that sensor fails because of the intake, they will not honor the warranty on that claim.

I believe there is an aftermarket intake/filter out there that is not oiled, not sure myself.
Reply
Old Oct 30, 2004 | 02:09 AM
  #33  
AFBLUE's Avatar
Dethroned Nascar Guru
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,059
Likes: 2
If thats on mustang dyno, the numbers are acually even higher
It was peformed on a dynojet.

Wow that's a huge difference. What causes such a wide range of HP?
Part of it is due to the fact there are different types of dynos. Mustang, dynojet are the two most popular.

But even if you took the same car to two different dynojets or two different mustang dynos, you will still get some variations.

The key is to compare apples to apples, i.e. compare two cars that have been dynoed on the same system.

Also it is important to use the same dyno when you are modifying your car so that you can precisely measure the changes.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 04:17 PM
  #34  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Originally posted by willy_sc5.0@October 28, 2004, 5:29 PM
DYNO 05 GT(blue) vs Mac 1 04(red)

http://www.corral.net/forums/attachment.ph...tid=39122&stc=1

Heh, heh... with 1 less valve too. Wonder what this motor is really capable of? I bet they could've gotten 300 hp out of the 2v SOHC if they had wanted too.

If chevy can get 400 hp from a 6.0 liter.....

I really hope Ford does an SE 3v 4.6 with at least 50 more HP myself.
Reply
Old Nov 1, 2004 | 04:55 PM
  #35  
BillP's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 11, 2004
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Originally posted by bob@November 1, 2004, 3:20 PM

If chevy can get 400 hp from a 6.0 liter.....

I really hope Ford does an SE 3v 4.6 with at least 50 more HP myself.

If Chevy can get 400HP from a 6 liter, then we should be getting 306HP from a 4.6L.

Oh, we are.

;-)
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 03:57 PM
  #36  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Originally posted by M1Rifle@November 1, 2004, 6:58 PM
If Chevy can get 400HP from a 6 liter, then we should be getting 306HP from a 4.6L.

Oh, we are.

;-)
I know the 3v 4.6 is putting out the same hp/liter, however I was refering to a 300 hp 2v engine (hindsight I know in light of the 3v 4.6), but the jist of my post is; Ford please ring this 3v 4.6 for all its worth before you start resorting to more valves, more cams, increased displacement, ect. (well not that I'm against NO REPLACEMENT FOR DISPLACEMENT) Its just that I'd dearly love to see these guys optimize this engine configuration before taking the easy way out.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2004 | 08:04 PM
  #37  
Fazm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 21, 2004
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
As far as ford tuning their new mustang to run a little on the rich side, engines have a tendency to last a little bit longer on the rich side, compared to lean. Lean cars will produce more power, but do not last as long. For example, when you install nitrous on a newer gt (not an 05) it is already running on the rich side, and there are companies that will gaurantee upwards of 150 shot of NOS. This is only possible because the car is already rich. If you take a car that is running lean (say an acura rsx type s) anything over a 50 shot of NOS will significantly shorten the engine life.

P.S. Lopers told me they would garuantee 100 shot of nitrous on my 01 gt, only heard of someplaces that will do 150 (complete NOSzle system from edelbrock).
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 12:40 AM
  #38  
hatsharpener's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Shea@October 28, 2004, 9:56 PM

Also, I don't understand why they would make this engine run rich from the factory. Usually cars run lean from the factory to keep emissions down and gas mileage up.
An engine that is running lean is more likely to detonate and cause serious engine damage (i.e. send a piston out the side of the block). Detonation can also occur if you accidentally get a tank of bad gas that isn't of the proper octane rating. If they make the mixture a little more fat (rich) from the factory, they won't have to worry about premature engine damage due to detonation.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2004 | 12:42 AM
  #39  
hatsharpener's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Originally posted by JZInternet@October 29, 2004, 1:33 AM
When they put these cars on the dyno, how consistant are they with each other. For example if you tested 100 new 2005 mustangs would they all be the same hp give or take 1 or 2 horses or does each car vary more than that?

Jason
The number you get from the factory is essentially the bare minimum that you would expect. You may get more, but generally speaking, you shouldn't get less.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2004 | 06:49 PM
  #40  
RARE 5.0 NOTCH's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: November 8, 2004
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
I have a 2004 gto auto and bone stock it put down 304rwhp 326.9tq
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:02 PM.