GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Roush Stage 3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 02:22 PM
  #1  
don_w's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
I recently read a review of the Roush Stage 3 in Mustang Enthusiast magazine (Feb 06 issue). A few things caught my attention:

1. The supercharger is a Roots-type operating at 4.5psi.

2. It comes with 3.27:1 rear gears (yes, 3.27)

3. In a drag test (using an accomplished race driver) it seemed to be less than impressive. Here is what the article said: "... Jimmy's best ET was 13.52 at 104.68 mph. Two other drivers were not close to his time... The ET might be shaved by a couple tenths, by opting for one of the lower axle ratios -- 3.55 and 3.73:1 -- to enable a more aggressive launch at higher engine rpm and less tire spin, and hitting the traps at a better spot in the power band."

4. I don't see how going to 3.55s or 3.73s will create less tire spin; it might cause more tire spin.

5. The target price tag is "under $50,000".

IMO, I couldn't justify $50K or so for mid- to low- 13s. But maybe that's just me.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 02:36 PM
  #2  
Rebel73's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: April 22, 2005
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: Lost Angels
woah, not very impressive, I agree...

I saw one the other day. It looked pretty aggresive, but it looks like it's mostly "show"..
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 02:37 PM
  #3  
RandyB's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 30, 2005
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
I was rather underwelmed by those numbers when I heard about them also. I don't see how it's possible since the previous generation Roush with 360 hp went as fast as 12.30s. Something's fishy here...

MM&FF went that fast in a Stage 2 Roush (mid-13s@104-ish?)
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 02:40 PM
  #4  
TexaStang's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 20, 2005
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
My plan, buy a supercharger and maybe a Roush body kit and an upgraded suspension kit, ie saleen, roush, steeda, etc. Have everything a stage 3 has minus Roush's autograph and save 20k
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 02:48 PM
  #5  
05stangkc's Avatar
Administrator clevparts@aol.com
 
Joined: November 27, 2004
Posts: 12,574
Likes: 4,318
From: Visalia Ca.
The Times do not Jive. It should be in the 12's and I do not see roush changing from 3.55's to 3.27's

kc
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 02:48 PM
  #6  
dhof303's Avatar
 
Joined: December 18, 2004
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
As for the Roush team, they were at all of the NMRA races this year. The quickest they could go was upper 11's and that is with a full race car: Cage, Jerico transmission, one piece drive shaft, air to ice-water intercooler, special Roush tuning, slicks, and who knows what gear. I know for sure that they will not help you go faster than their sponsored car with their Roush products. These guys are a bunch of rich ex-pro racers with factory sponsorship. As for the Roush cars from the Roush plant, they are too mainstream for me and offer the "tuner" version of Ford's Mustang.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 02:52 PM
  #7  
SixtySix's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,153
Likes: 0
13.5 ! Where were they running! Death Valley at 130 degrees in July :scratch:
Bizarre!
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 03:16 PM
  #8  
don_w's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
Originally posted by 05stangkc+December 9, 2005, 1:51 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(05stangkc @ December 9, 2005, 1:51 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'> I do not see roush changing from 3.55's to 3.27's
[/b]


That's what it said in the article... on several occasions. Maybe the article was wrong.

<!--QuoteBegin-SixtySix
@December 9, 2005, 1:55 PM
13.5 ! Where were they running! Death Valley at 130 degrees in July :scratch:
Bizarre!
[/quote]

They were in Michigan, but I don't recall a weather report in the article. Most likely it was hot... how else could you explain the 13.5 time (and that was the best one!).
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 03:19 PM
  #9  
RandyB's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 30, 2005
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
The trap speed is the most disappointing thing to me. I can't help that they weren't able to make it ET good, but I expected at least 110 mph.
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 03:26 PM
  #10  
SixtySix's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,153
Likes: 0
Originally posted by don_w@December 9, 2005, 3:19 PM
That's what it said in the article... on several occasions. Maybe the article was wrong.
They were in Michigan, but I don't recall a weather report in the article. Most likely it was hot... how else could you explain the 13.5 time (and that was the best one!).

No joke, most people around here are doing that and better with an intake and tune.
In fact, I'll bet I'll run either real close to that or better tommorow.

Makes no sense at all.

Now if it said 13.5 @ 110-115 I might buy that it's a typo and was supposed be 12.5, but not when the traps match the time.

Was this accomplished racer stopping for coffee and smoking a cig in between shifts or sumphin
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 03:32 PM
  #11  
don_w's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
Originally posted by SixtySix+December 9, 2005, 2:29 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(SixtySix @ December 9, 2005, 2:29 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>Now if it said 13.5 @ 110-115 I might buy that it's a typo and was supposed be 12.5, but not when the traps match the time.
[/b]


I agree.

<!--QuoteBegin-SixtySix
@December 9, 2005, 2:29 PM
Was this accomplished racer stopping for coffee and smoking a cig in between shifts or sumphin
[/quote]

Here is what it says: "On a sunny day at mid-Michigan Motorplex during the weekend of the Pure Stock Drags, we put manual transmission ace Jimmy Johnston behind the wheel. Jimmy is one of the best 4-speed drivers we've ever seen, and at this event, he drove his '69 Corvette to the best ET of the 130-car field by a wide margin, and setting a new record."
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 03:49 PM
  #12  
clintoris's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 19, 2004
Posts: 1,288
Likes: 0
well.... perhaps the car is not being designed for drag racing... thus the 3.27's.... Jack Roush has NASCAR teams and has been doing road racing forever...

just a thought?
Reply
Old Dec 9, 2005 | 04:00 PM
  #13  
don_w's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
Originally posted by clintoris@December 9, 2005, 2:52 PM
well.... perhaps the car is not being designed for drag racing... thus the 3.27's.... Jack Roush has NASCAR teams and has been doing road racing forever...

just a thought?
Oh, that is definitely the case. The suspension setup is mainly for twisties. But you can get all that in the Stage 2. The blower (w/injectors and a tune) is the main difference between Stage 2 and Stage 3... I just expected better numbers that what a mildly modded stock GT can do.

And I hope Jack Roush hasn't completely forgotten his drag racing roots... he was successful there long before he was in NASCAR, SCCA, IMSA and IRL.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
09-gt/cs
GT Performance Mods
9
Oct 15, 2015 10:03 AM
RoushRS3
2010-2014 Mustang
7
Sep 29, 2015 08:03 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:41 PM.