GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

returning to stock for dyno

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 19, 2008 | 02:43 AM
  #1  
ETNOATS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: February 2, 2004
Posts: 629
Likes: 1
returning to stock for dyno

Im seriously considering returning my car to stock to do some baseline dyno runs. My only performance mods are CAI, tune, high flow cats, Mac prochamber and Mac axel backs. My question is should I return the exhaust back to stock, a good afternoon under the car, or just return the intake and tune back to stock. How much HP could I have gained out the exhaust? From what Ive read on here, only a few HP from axel backs, but maybe what about the prochamber and hi flow cats.
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 10:32 AM
  #2  
Kluski's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 23, 2004
Posts: 2,147
Likes: 9
From: Pittsburgh, PA
I would think if you want some good baseline runs, then yes return to bone stock. But that is me. The exhaust numbers would be noticeable on the dyno.
Reply
Old May 19, 2008 | 04:51 PM
  #3  
mrkabc's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: November 13, 2005
Posts: 2,193
Likes: 46
Ugh... why not rent or borrow a stock 'Stang and save yourself all that trouble...
Reply
Old May 21, 2008 | 05:36 AM
  #4  
ETNOATS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: February 2, 2004
Posts: 629
Likes: 1
Ive just seen to much variation in the numbers from different cars, shops and even types of dynos.
Reply
Old May 21, 2008 | 07:42 AM
  #5  
70MACH1OWNER's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 9, 2005
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 6
From: New Carlisle, Ohio (20 miles north of Dayton)
Only way to know what your car will do is to go back to 100% stock. So how bad do you really want to know?
Reply
Old May 21, 2008 | 08:41 AM
  #6  
300GT's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 12, 2008
Posts: 163
Likes: 1
From: Coatesville, PA
...and why do you want to know? Not being critical - just curious.
Reply
Old May 21, 2008 | 09:37 AM
  #7  
DarkFireGT's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 26, 2006
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
From: East Moline, IL
Originally Posted by ETNOATS
Ive just seen to much variation in the numbers from different cars, shops and even types of dynos.
Definitely. On the same dyno and same day, I've seen stock S197's put down 247 - 263 rwhp.
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 01:49 AM
  #8  
ETNOATS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: February 2, 2004
Posts: 629
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by 300GT
...and why do you want to know? Not being critical - just curious.
Yes, just curious. Just don't know if I want to spend two afternoons pulling the exhaust out and putting it back in. But I already have to get under it to fix some exhaust leaks and move the tips forward since they are knocking against the brackets. Argh!!! decisions, decisions.
Reply
Old May 22, 2008 | 05:20 AM
  #9  
Glenn's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: August 7, 2006
Posts: 16,113
Likes: 789
From: In Boredom
what else do you have to do
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2008 | 04:00 AM
  #10  
ETNOATS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: February 2, 2004
Posts: 629
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Glenn
what else do you have to do

As far as what? If your asking about what exhaust work. I would have to replace everything from the manifolds back except the over axel pipes. As it sits right now, I should be able to just pull the prochamber off, straighten out the flanges and install new clamps. If I had a lift it wouldn't be as bad. But doing this in the driveway is a royal PITA. Taking it back to stock would give me a chance to get some new videos and sound clips to compare to what I have now.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Antigini-GT/CS
2005-2009 Mustang
5
Oct 5, 2015 09:43 AM
FromZto5
2010-2014 Mustang
61
Sep 30, 2015 05:28 AM
samjluck
5.0L GT Modifications
7
Sep 17, 2015 10:24 PM
M3hunter
Suspension, Brakes, and Tire Tech
5
Sep 10, 2015 09:26 AM
JTB
Motorsports
1
Sep 3, 2015 10:50 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:56 AM.