GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

is the mach 1 faster then the 05 gt? i know

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 09:49 PM
  #1  
elvism's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra Member
 
Joined: November 13, 2004
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 1
From: jersey
i brought this up a few months but i have been reading that the mach1 can do around 13.1 in 1/4? were these cars underrated in hp/tq? rated at 305hp ?? what gives? 05 gt not even close! anyone race a stock model?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 10:44 PM
  #2  
Cleveland's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 20, 2005
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 0
The 05 GT isnt close to that "13.1".... yeah right

Some drivers are able to get that close with a lot of practice.

-Dan
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 11:34 PM
  #3  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
I was at a 1/4 mi track 3 weeks ago with a guy who had a stock '04 Mach 1. I had the CAI/Pred at the time, but still stock 3.31 rear gears. I ran 13.90s with my automatic, he ran 13.70s with his manual. There was a strong head wind that day, so his car (and mine) may be able to run quicker. But, he had 2-tenths on me. Was that because it has more hp, or was it a difference in the transmissions? Or did aerodynamics play a role. Can't say for sure.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 11:42 PM
  #4  
racerx's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 8, 2004
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Isn't the Mach 1 lighter than the '05 GT?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 11:44 PM
  #5  
ManEHawke's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 2,917
Likes: 0
From: Riverside, CA
I recall a 20lb difference. Nothing that will make a big difference.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 11:46 PM
  #6  
DANNY's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 9, 2004
Posts: 492
Likes: 0
Originally posted by elvism@July 10, 2005, 9:52 PM
i brought this up a few months but i have been reading that the mach1 can do around 13.1 in 1/4? were these cars underrated in hp/tq? rated at 305hp ?? what gives? 05 gt not even close! anyone race a stock model?
Yes rated at 305hp,but i have run a mach1 auto and got the win in the 1/4. As for the 13.1,they are not stock,we have about 4 or 5 in the stang club and they do not get that time if they are stock.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 12:25 AM
  #7  
wild stray's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: September 18, 2004
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Originally posted by DANNY@July 10, 2005, 10:49 PM
Yes rated at 305hp,but i have run a mach1 auto and got the win in the 1/4. As for the 13.1,they are not stock,we have about 4 or 5 in the stang club and they do not get that time if they are stock.


Very much a drivers race!
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 12:42 AM
  #8  
1trickpony's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2005
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
The manual Mach 1 was a different animal than an automatic. The auto had a lower power rating and a redline (6000 vs 6800 rpm). The dyno numbers are very close so it should be a driver's race with a manual trans and a pretty easy race for an automatic 05 GT with the new 5 speed trans. All even, I think the manual Mach 1 would barely edge the 05 GT because of the higher redline.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 01:36 AM
  #9  
wild stray's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: September 18, 2004
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Originally posted by 1trickpony@July 10, 2005, 11:45 PM
The manual Mach 1 was a different animal than an automatic.

For sure!

All even, I think the manual Mach 1 would barely edge the 05 GT because of the higher redline.
Maybe, but I have not seen it. This is close enough to where I would like to see a "good" driver of each make a few runs.

I bought the new '05 "bodystyle" & "upgrades", but I have a lot of respect for the Mach's, if the driver knows what they are doing. Same with the SS, put down two of each so far, but had the biggest problem to-date with an old IROC. The Iroc was modded.....I know it had gears and exhaust....don't know anything else, but what I witnessed.
As far as the Mach's, I'd rather have that engine :worship, if it were lighter.
As far as the Camaro SS, they can have a field day with their mods. :worship: If they have the money which most don't!
Paul
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 08:20 AM
  #10  
MrMorden's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
The Mach I is probably a stronger car, but also has a less sophisticated suspension, which makes it harder to get the power down. Definitely a driver's race, stock to stock.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 02:31 PM
  #11  
PACETTR's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 9, 2004
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
All things equal the Mach is .3 - .4 and 3 - 4 mph quicker in the 1/4...
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 02:43 PM
  #12  
max2000jp's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: September 2, 2004
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally posted by PACETTR@July 11, 2005, 3:34 PM
All things equal the Mach is .3 - .4 and 3 - 4 mph quicker in the 1/4...
What are you smokin?
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 03:00 PM
  #13  
1999 Black 35th GT's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: March 30, 2005
Posts: 3,643
Likes: 0
Originally posted by PACETTR@July 11, 2005, 4:34 PM
All things equal the Mach is .3 - .4 and 3 - 4 mph quicker in the 1/4...
I believe he's pretty much correct. Remember once the Machs reach 80+ Mph the Shaker is fully functional. Now granted it only adds maybe 5 hp if you're lucky but it can make a difference. The Mach 1's also use the 4 valve set up opposed to the 3 valve setup and has a more efficient power band than the 05's. A common misconception is that the Mach 1 engines were just 4-valve Cobra engines with the shaker intake. This couldn't be farther from the truth. The Mach engine was a totally redesigned 4-valve with a much better midrang power than the Cobra's had.


This is per Scothew on a topic of a stock Mach breaking into the 12's:

You guys forget, mach1 engines were designed with one thing in mind. A great trq curve. They make alot better midrange power than most n/a cobra's. They have a slightly different cam profile which helps tremendously.

Also they have a better suspension package which helps in the weight transfer quite a bit. Plus the 3.55 gears in a solid rear axle is going to do alot better than a 99+ cobra with its weaker IRS that unless heavily modified will wheel hop enough to break a half-shaft on street tires.

I dont doubt the 12.95 on a stock car, but the guy is a great driver and knows his car better than he knows how to wipe his own rear. Power shifting is a must in order to acheive times like that, which I dont condone on a stock shifter equipped tranny (kiss the shift forks goodbye after time).
Here's the topic thread Mach 1 into 12's
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 03:41 PM
  #14  
qwik huh's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: May 27, 2005
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
I have driven both on the same day at the same track. Neither was my car and I had no seat time up until I made my first pass. I ran a 13.2@105 in a stock 04 Mach 1 5 speed and 13.5@102 in a stock 05 GT
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 09:21 PM
  #15  
ZRX4ME's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: July 19, 2004
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Originally posted by qwik huh@July 11, 2005, 3:44 PM
I have driven both on the same day at the same track. Neither was my car and I had no seat time up until I made my first pass. I ran a 13.2@105 in a stock 04 Mach 1 5 speed and 13.5@102 in a stock 05 GT


having had both,I can agree with that.I think if the '05 had a SCT or pred tune things would be more even.The electronic throttle and torque management hinder the '05 GT.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2005 | 01:54 AM
  #16  
1trickpony's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2005
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
One other point, I think the Mach 1 has 26" tires versus 27" on the 05. That's about a 4 percent advantage for the Mach 1.
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2005 | 06:57 PM
  #17  
stkdidy's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 7, 2005
Posts: 410
Likes: 0
all i know is i killed a mach1 last friday by a car and a half or more

it def had exhaust, but i doubt anything else...and i have a few tricks up mah sleeve
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2005 | 12:17 AM
  #18  
1trickpony's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2005
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
Sounds like a few of those tricks is 4.10s and a good tune.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2005 | 07:01 AM
  #19  
qwik huh's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: May 27, 2005
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Originally posted by ZRX4ME@July 11, 2005, 10:24 PM
having had both,I can agree with that.I think if the '05 had a SCT or pred tune things would be more even.The electronic throttle and torque management hinder the '05 GT.
Yea I would agree with that. With a tune in the car I think they would be even. as it is now its a drivers race. I have personally seen a stock Mach 1 with a shifter run a 12.9@105 and I don't think a stock GT has gone much faster than 13.2-13.3
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2005 | 07:04 AM
  #20  
qwik huh's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: May 27, 2005
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Originally posted by stkdidy@July 12, 2005, 8:00 PM
all i know is i killed a mach1 last friday by a car and a half or more

it def had exhaust, but i doubt anything else...and i have a few tricks up mah sleeve

Find a Mach 1 with 4:10s and try again
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:54 AM.