GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

looking for info on KR springs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 7, 2010 | 07:50 AM
  #1  
Anthony k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: September 21, 2008
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
looking for info on KR springs

buyfordracing is selling gt500 KR springs at a really good price. wondering if anyone has used them and how much they lowered a gt ot gt/cs from stock ride height....
Reply
Old May 7, 2010 | 07:54 AM
  #2  
YardSpecial's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 5, 2006
Posts: 368
Likes: 0
From: MT
I would like to know also ...............
Reply
Old May 7, 2010 | 07:55 AM
  #3  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Wouldn't the front be too firm for a GT?
Reply
Old May 7, 2010 | 07:58 AM
  #4  
MTAS's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 2,298
Likes: 4
From: Tampa FL
I asked them about whether they would be good to use on a 4.6 Mustang, they said they would only recommend them for a Mustang with a 5.4 due to the heavier weight. I scratched that possible purchase off my list
Reply
Old May 7, 2010 | 03:09 PM
  #5  
RedDragon777's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: June 4, 2006
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 0
From: McAllen, TX
you can use them but they will level the car out instead of lowering it and keep the rake.
Reply
Old May 9, 2010 | 05:08 PM
  #6  
Anthony k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: September 21, 2008
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
so in order to keep the rake that the car has, should i use the FRPP springs? P's i believe? i am only looking to lower an inch or so
Reply
Old May 9, 2010 | 06:43 PM
  #7  
RedDragon777's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: June 4, 2006
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 0
From: McAllen, TX
I have the older model FRPP that drops the car 1.5" but FRPP just released the new set that only drops it an inch. So yes if you want the rake then go for the 1" kit.
Reply
Old May 10, 2010 | 02:52 AM
  #8  
anteyeiabazele's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: June 19, 2007
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
...

What is "rake"?
Reply
Old May 10, 2010 | 12:07 PM
  #9  
Anthony k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: September 21, 2008
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
When the front of the car is lower than the rear. Been refered to as "rake" for oh about 50-60 years
Reply
Old May 10, 2010 | 12:15 PM
  #10  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
from the jacked up rear end era.
Reply
Old May 10, 2010 | 01:45 PM
  #11  
WaltM's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: August 9, 2007
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia
Don't be too disappointed about the KR springs. There are tons of springs available for GT's. Personally? I'd rather have the right ones than the cheap ones. Steeda, FRPP, Vogland and H&R are all fine products.

Or go here...
https://themustangsource.com/showthread.php?t=482740

Last edited by WaltM; May 10, 2010 at 03:20 PM.
Reply
Old May 10, 2010 | 05:29 PM
  #12  
Anthony k's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: September 21, 2008
Posts: 374
Likes: 0
never was disappointed.

actually got a better deal on new P springs. getting them tomorrow
Reply
Old May 10, 2010 | 05:55 PM
  #13  
WaltM's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: August 9, 2007
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia
Originally Posted by Anthony k
never was disappointed.

actually got a better deal on new P springs. getting them tomorrow

Reply
Old May 11, 2010 | 02:00 AM
  #14  
anteyeiabazele's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: June 19, 2007
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
...

Originally Posted by Anthony k
When the front of the car is lower than the rear. Been refered to as "rake" for oh about 50-60 years
No doubt but I have been studying muscle cars only the last 3 years since I got my mustang and i gotta say i never heard that one til now!

Personally I think the "rake" is what defines a muscle car!
That is the look i have now and what i was going for... But, and this is just my opinion, i think for the 2005+ mustang to look real good in rake it has to be exactly like the "Cobra Jet" which means fat *** tires in the back!
Reason being "IMO always" the 2005+ mustang is a big car and it needs big wheels/tires in the back to make it look the way the old cars looked, which i love!


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Last edited by anteyeiabazele; May 11, 2010 at 02:10 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Autotooner
SN95 Mustang
11
Nov 24, 2017 12:42 PM
boz
Introductions
7
Oct 1, 2015 04:47 PM
GeoWett
GT
3
Sep 30, 2015 06:40 AM
GLOCKer
General Mustang Chat
2
Sep 28, 2015 05:20 PM
AJ_Trevino15
Suspension, Brakes, and Tire Tech
1
Sep 28, 2015 07:51 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:31 PM.