GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Long tube header options?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 03:58 PM
  #1  
INTRUDER's Avatar
Thread Starter
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: March 25, 2005
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Is there a newer long tube header that might be cheaper than $700.00?

Hasn't some done a knock-off of a high end design yet?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 04:07 PM
  #2  
MaverickMLFD371's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: July 20, 2004
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Hooker Long Tubes - Ceramic Coated $530
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 06:06 PM
  #3  
atomic_il's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 31, 2005
Posts: 378
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(MaverickMLFD371 @ February 13, 2006, 6:10 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Hooker Long Tubes - Ceramic Coated $530
[/b][/quote]

Where are they 530?? [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/banana.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/banana.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/banana.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/banana.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/banana.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/banana.gif[/img]
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 06:32 PM
  #5  
GIG4FUN's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: October 24, 2005
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
Where are the Hookers $530?
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 07:26 PM
  #6  
Firedude's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 3, 2005
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
You get what you pay for. Too cheap and you will be tightening them all the time and blowing gaskets. Plus sometimes fit and finish suffer.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 07:48 PM
  #7  
Torrence's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2005
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
I was going to get the Hooker set up last week, until I learned that I could get the JBA set up for less. Maverick gave me a number for an Atlanta based distributor, I gave them a call and the headers were about 530, however the x-pipe that goes with it is about 280 and I was not about to pay that 810 would have been the total for that. So I got what I wanted, which was JBA longtubes silver ceramic coated for 699 and a o/h from blackhat for 100 and that set up was 799, it came out cheaper and I got what I wanted. The JBA o/h is going for 199.

The best part is, the install is only gonna set me back 466, which is cheap for this job.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2006 | 08:27 PM
  #8  
MaverickMLFD371's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: July 20, 2004
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(atomic_il @ February 13, 2006, 8:09 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Where are they 530?? [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/banana.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/banana.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/banana.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/banana.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/banana.gif[/img] [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/banana.gif[/img]
[/b][/quote]


<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(GIG4FUN @ February 13, 2006, 8:35 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Where are the Hookers $530?
[/b][/quote]


Barnett Performance
www.barnettperformance.com
Atlanta, GA
800-533-1320
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 10:58 AM
  #9  
phord's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: April 23, 2005
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
I just called Barnett Performance and they said they did not have JBA headers. Is there anyone special to talk to there?

I just called Barnett Performance and they said they did not have JBA headers. Is there anyone special to talk to there?
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 11:08 AM
  #10  
MaverickMLFD371's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: July 20, 2004
Posts: 2,693
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(phord @ February 14, 2006, 1:01 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
I just called Barnett Performance and they said they did not have JBA headers. Is there anyone special to talk to there?

I just called Barnett Performance and they said they did not have JBA headers. Is there anyone special to talk to there?
[/b][/quote]


They dont carry JBA Headers, they were for Hooker Headers, read the post......
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 11:12 AM
  #11  
NOLAGT's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 25, 2005
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
Is there performance/sound differences with the hookers and JBA's?

I have a brenspeed o/r H....couldnt that be cut so it would fit either of those two LT's?
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 12:20 PM
  #13  
Torrence's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2005
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(NOLAGT @ February 14, 2006, 2:15 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Is there performance/sound differences with the hookers and JBA's?

I have a brenspeed o/r H....couldnt that be cut so it would fit either of those two LT's?
[/b][/quote]

From what I have been reading and hearing, JBA's are suppose to be the best out there bar none. I believe they are thicker than the Hookers. Mine will be here in two days.

I met up with blackhat97 on Saturday and he had his installed, with cats. I am going to be running no cats. His car sounded unbelieveable. I was very impressed. Very loud and deep.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 12:29 PM
  #14  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Torrence @ February 14, 2006, 11:23 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
JBA's are suppose to be the best out there bar none. [/b][/quote]

That's a stretch IMO... [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/nonono.gif[/img] I can name at least 3 brands I would consider better than JBA.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 12:53 PM
  #15  
Torrence's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 29, 2005
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(don_w @ February 14, 2006, 3:32 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
That's a stretch IMO... [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/nonono.gif[/img] I can name at least 3 brands I would consider better than JBA.
[/b][/quote]

Don, which ones? Everyone is just so heavily publicising these headers, it's hard to get a different opinion on another product.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 01:12 PM
  #16  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Torrence @ February 14, 2006, 11:56 AM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
Don, which ones? Everyone is just so heavily publicising these headers, it's hard to get a different opinion on another product.
[/b][/quote]

For my money, I would buy Stainless Works, Kooks, or Dynatechs (and probably Hooker) before I would buy JBA's. But, that is just my opinion... to each his own.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 01:35 PM
  #17  
NOLAGT's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 25, 2005
Posts: 921
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(don_w @ February 14, 2006, 2:15 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
For my money, I would buy Stainless Works, Kooks, or Dynatechs (and probably Hooker) before I would buy JBA's. But, that is just my opinion... to each his own.
[/b][/quote]


Hookers would be fine with me...right price and fun name whats not to like [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/biggrinjester.gif[/img]

But I was wondering is the power gains between the different brands all about the same (within 5 hp)...as well as the sound? Different axelbacks sound different just wondering if headers are the same. I want an H or a prochamber attached to whatever LT's would go on and I would imagin my o/r H can be made to fit as well as a prochamer...right?
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 02:09 PM
  #18  
SONICBOOST's Avatar
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
Joined: January 17, 2006
Posts: 4,148
Likes: 3
From: Temecula,CA
Mac longhtubes, 470$.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 03:05 PM
  #19  
BlackonBlack's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: January 16, 2006
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(don_w @ February 14, 2006, 12:15 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
For my money, I would buy Stainless Works, Kooks, or Dynatechs (and probably Hooker) before I would buy JBA's. But, that is just my opinion... to each his own.
[/b][/quote]

I agree the Stainless, Kooks, and Dynatechs are better, but watch the Hookers [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/04.gif[/img] . 5/16" flanges as opposed to 3/8" for the rest. Thicker flanges, less change for warping/leaks down the road IMHO.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2006 | 03:16 PM
  #20  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(BlackonBlack @ February 14, 2006, 2:08 PM) Quoted post</div><div class='quotemain'>
I agree the Stainless, Kooks, and Dynatechs are better, but watch the Hookers [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/04.gif[/img] . 5/16" flanges as opposed to 3/8" for the rest. Thicker flanges, less change for warping/leaks down the road IMHO.
[/b][/quote]

I agree on the flange thickness... I included Hooker as a "probably" based on the cost savings compared to JBA.

The other thing people need to remember is the primary tube size. The 1.75" primaries are probably not the best choice for a NA motor.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:09 PM.