GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

help a man in need for more speed!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7/17/07, 04:17 PM
  #21  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Glenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 7, 2006
Location: In Boredom
Posts: 15,820
Received 781 Likes on 570 Posts
Originally Posted by chabbz182
not everybody wants to void their warranty right of the bat and not everyone has 4-6 grand to drop on a turbo or supercharger either.
fer sure I am one of them.
Old 7/17/07, 05:36 PM
  #22  
GT Member
 
ScottM's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 20, 2006
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chabbz182
ahh stop with the jlt. That's a budget intake.
Totally your opinion. I just hope everyone else doing research on intakes realizes that this is one person's opinion and that everyone that owns one (that I know of) is totally happy with it and had zero problems out of the "cheap" intake. It was also one of the top performers in the CAI shoot out.

It is by all means not a budget intake, at least in my opinion or many others that have bought it.
Old 7/17/07, 09:26 PM
  #23  
GT Member
 
chabbz182's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 7, 2005
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I did own one and it was cheaply made and I got a better one. Of course it will work but its poorly designed.
Old 7/18/07, 11:33 AM
  #24  
V6 Member
Thread Starter
 
1mike1's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 11, 2007
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://rpmoutlet.com/05gtsnb.htm
is this true 25hp? at the crank maybe.. i like the design bescause it's enclosed though..

thinking of the C&L True flow with the X2 tune from babachips for 625..

or,

http://rpmoutlet.com/05gt.htm
with the choice of either Diablosport predator, Sniper or SCT..

whats the word on either of these tuners?

as the tuner & intake is not as much as i thought, i was thinking of getting the BBK throttle body.. is this TB good for the 10rwhp as advertisded?

once again, thanks guys!
Old 7/18/07, 01:00 PM
  #25  
Cobra Member
 
mach1fever's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 28, 2004
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It also made the most hp when tested by sct themselves, vmp, and other tuners in the area. It may be cheaply made but they are doing something right. The diamete of the tube is larger and so is the filter.
Old 7/18/07, 01:19 PM
  #26  
GT Member
 
chabbz182's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 7, 2005
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your choice of the C&L with the x2 tune from bamachips is probably the best one. I hear alot of people having problems with the throttle body.
Old 7/18/07, 05:09 PM
  #27  
GT Member
 
ScottM's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 20, 2006
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by chabbz182
Your choice of the C&L with the x2 tune from bamachips is probably the best one. I hear alot of people having problems with the throttle body.
I completely agree, that is a great choice.

I've read many horror stories as well with the throttle bodys, definately stay away and put your money towards something else.
Old 7/19/07, 07:57 AM
  #28  
 
uberPony's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 20, 2006
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
chabbz192,
I know what the difference is in aftermarket cams from stock - I was installing cams when you were not even a glimmer in your daddy's eyes.

So then. what cams have you installed in these cars? please tell us...
Lets see your 40 HP gain in your dyno sheet. I bet you can not show that to us because I bet you don't even have aftermarket cams in your car.
I have never seen anyone get 40 from cams on these cars, sorry but you can try and prove the fact otherwise.
Yes, cams cost most people close to 2000 dollars.
The cams run about 1000 and then labor is 600-1000 dollars to have them installed. So that is a good chunk of change towards forced induction.

Oh, and the dealers may give you the same warranty hassle over cams as a they would a blower if the dealer is like that, In fact, they will hassle you over the CAI too. So how does installing cams and CAI better for a warranty than a blower?
Old 7/19/07, 03:29 PM
  #29  
GT Member
 
chabbz182's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 7, 2005
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I don't get a hassle for warranty repair from a CAI. Not everyone else does either. Yes with stage 3 cams and a tune with it you can see a 40 hp gain. Don't believe it contact Brent or Doug who most likely dyno'd these and seen the HP increase.


Originally Posted by uberPony
chabbz192,
I know what the difference is in aftermarket cams from stock - I was installing cams when you were not even a glimmer in your daddy's eyes.

So then. what cams have you installed in these cars? please tell us...
Lets see your 40 HP gain in your dyno sheet. I bet you can not show that to us because I bet you don't even have aftermarket cams in your car.
I have never seen anyone get 40 from cams on these cars, sorry but you can try and prove the fact otherwise.
Yes, cams cost most people close to 2000 dollars.
The cams run about 1000 and then labor is 600-1000 dollars to have them installed. So that is a good chunk of change towards forced induction.

Oh, and the dealers may give you the same warranty hassle over cams as a they would a blower if the dealer is like that, In fact, they will hassle you over the CAI too. So how does installing cams and CAI better for a warranty than a blower?
Old 7/22/07, 03:13 PM
  #30  
Cobra Member
 
mach1fever's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 28, 2004
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
well if your going to drop that kind of change just put on the a 75-100 shot of giggle juice and call it a day
Old 7/22/07, 05:31 PM
  #31  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
97svtgoin05gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 21, 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I believe juice is harder on your car than other forced induction methods and will/can cause premature engine failure more easily than the others. I'm not certain about this, but as I recall, that is the case. Perhaps the hardcore draggers can chime in on this.
Old 7/23/07, 01:39 PM
  #32  
Cobra Member
 
mach1fever's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 28, 2004
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its all in the tune. A mild 75 shot is a lot cheaper, offers the same hp, and can be taken off easily. As with anything else the safety is in the tune.

Roger
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kponypower
GT
13
6/17/20 07:17 AM
CiniZter
General Vehicle Discussion/News
25
4/28/16 05:41 PM
blackhawkkid308
1994-2004 V-8
18
12/22/15 03:17 AM
robjh22
Car Care
20
12/14/15 08:41 AM



Quick Reply: help a man in need for more speed!



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:42 PM.