GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Got my JLT and SCT X2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 17, 2005 | 11:13 PM
  #1  
Blullitt05's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: July 11, 2005
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Jay forgot the rubber elbow piece from the TB to the intake :-( I emailed him so hopefully I can get one sent soon.

I got the intake painted sonic blue to match the car so everything looks awesome. Just wished I had that one piece to install the intake & load up the tune now.

Few questions though...

1) I got the 87 & 91 oct tunes, where I live, they sell 87,89,93. If I load up the 91 tune, can I use 93 since we don't get 91?

2) The hose issue some members are having, I'd figured I should go ahead and get a better piece. What kind of 3/8" hose should I get to solve the pulley in the way problem?
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2005 | 02:02 AM
  #2  
Purple Hayz's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 25, 2004
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
You can use higher octane gas than the tune calls far. In fact, you're far less likely to get detonation (ping) if you use a slightly higher octane rating. The only thing you don't want to do is use low octane gas with a high octane tune (obviously). Good luck with your new toys!
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2005 | 06:04 AM
  #3  
SC67Stang's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: February 18, 2004
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
The 3/8" fuel line works great.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2005 | 06:13 AM
  #4  
outdoorstom's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: December 1, 2004
Posts: 2,098
Likes: 0
From: Waddington, NY (waaaay up north)
Originally posted by Purple Hayz@September 18, 2005, 2:05 AM
You can use higher octane gas than the tune calls far. In fact, you're far less likely to get detonation (ping) if you use a slightly higher octane rating. The only thing you don't want to do is use low octane gas with a high octane tune (obviously). Good luck with your new toys!

Hope you don't mind me asking a couple of questions.....Is pinging a common problem when someone gets a tune? If pinging is heard at a lower octane, but not with the higher, can you be pretty sure that it's not an issue anymore? Probably silly questions, but just trying to learn about this stuff.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2005 | 07:14 AM
  #5  
Hatchman's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: May 17, 2005
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 1
From: Chesapeake, VA
Originally posted by outdoorstom@September 18, 2005, 7:16 AM
Hope you don't mind me asking a couple of questions.....Is pinging a common problem when someone gets a tune? If pinging is heard at a lower octane, but not with the higher, can you be pretty sure that it's not an issue anymore? Probably silly questions, but just trying to learn about this stuff.
Pinging is usually a sympton when someone is using lower octane fuel than their tune or vehicle is designed to use. Using a higher octane fuel than the tune calls for will not hurt, but it may be a waste of money, since you may get no horsepower benefit from buying a more expensive fuel. Running a lower octane fuel than the tune calls for can cause detonation/pinging due... well let's just say it doesn't burn like the tune was designed for.

In other words, load the 93 tune, use 91, and have a blast. And you can still fill up with 93 whenever you're on a trip. I found a gas station once that had 93.5, so I filled up with that on the way there, and on the way back.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2005 | 08:18 AM
  #6  
Clem's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 2, 2005
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
A couple of months back, I also purchased the JLT and the Xcal-2 with the 87 and 93 octane tunes by DTP. So, off to the tuner I go for before and after dynos and to tweak the tunes if necessary. George, my tuner, mistakenly made a pull on 87 octane fuel with the 93 octane tune loaded. We were datalogging and no pinging was detected. When we ran 93 fuel with the 93 tune, the HP increase was a whopping 1. I left the 93 tune loaded and, of course, run 93 fuel. We made these pulls on a very hot and humid July day, so maybe when the cool weather arrives I'll see more benefit from this tune.
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2005 | 09:35 AM
  #7  
Doug@C&L's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: July 28, 2004
Posts: 848
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Clem@September 18, 2005, 8:21 AM
A couple of months back, I also purchased the JLT and the Xcal-2 with the 87 and 93 octane tunes by DTP. So, off to the tuner I go for before and after dynos and to tweak the tunes if necessary. George, my tuner, mistakenly made a pull on 87 octane fuel with the 93 octane tune loaded. We were datalogging and no pinging was detected. When we ran 93 fuel with the 93 tune, the HP increase was a whopping 1. I left the 93 tune loaded and, of course, run 93 fuel. We made these pulls on a very hot and humid July day, so maybe when the cool weather arrives I'll see more benefit from this tune.

Thank Ford for such a sensative knock sensor, the reason the power was so much better on the 93 fuel was it wasn't retarding as much as 8-10 degree's of timing and it was making more power. Timing is everything for power but you cant just throw it at an engine and expect good things, you have to know where to put it and on these new 3-valves there's more then one table.

Thanks, Doug.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 08:21 AM
  #8  
Tucker's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: February 19, 2005
Posts: 674
Likes: 1
Sorry for the screw up. I have a ton on my mind with a new baby due any minute now.
It went out Priority mail yesterday.

Jay
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 08:28 AM
  #9  
Blullitt05's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: July 11, 2005
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
No problem man. Hope everything goes well with the baby.
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 06:46 PM
  #10  
traffic142's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: July 21, 2005
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 0
where did you get it from?
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 07:00 PM
  #11  
traffic142's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: July 21, 2005
Posts: 1,538
Likes: 0
BTW what is the HP estimate ona basic stock engine with a sct2 tune and intake??

hope you enjoy it
Reply
Old Sep 20, 2005 | 10:05 PM
  #12  
Blullitt05's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: July 11, 2005
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
htttp://www.jlttruecoldair.com

Dyno proven to be anywhere from 25-35 rwhp.

I'll make a review soon this week when it goes on the car.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trackpack13gt
2010-2014 Mustang
6
Jul 25, 2017 05:29 PM
Antigini-GT/CS
2005-2009 Mustang
5
Oct 5, 2015 09:43 AM
14Glassback
2010-2014 Mustang
4
Oct 4, 2015 08:52 AM
RoushRS3
2010-2014 Mustang
7
Sep 29, 2015 08:03 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:13 PM.