GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Carbon Trap Removal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3/2/05 | 03:14 PM
  #1  
Fordracing200's Avatar
Thread Starter
GTR Member
 
Joined: October 30, 2004
Posts: 4,999
Likes: 0
The carbon trap removal is worth 2rwhp. It was dyno'd
Old 3/2/05 | 05:12 PM
  #2  
elvism's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: November 13, 2004
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 1
From: jersey
Originally posted by Fordracing200@March 2, 2005, 3:17 PM
The carbon trap removal is worth 2rwhp. It was dyno'd
i'll second that
Old 3/2/05 | 05:13 PM
  #3  
acadian's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: May 18, 2004
Posts: 3,202
Likes: 0
I've heard 2 somewhere else too. But I also have heard as many as 8 and that was proven with a dyno as well. It really depends on the car, temperature, situation, machine, etc. Removing the HC trap will average around 5 HP. That's a good average.
Old 3/2/05 | 05:17 PM
  #4  
KansasCityTim's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 19, 2005
Posts: 1,106
Likes: 0
From: Olathe, KS
Any adverse affects of removing the carbon trap? Need a tune?
Old 3/2/05 | 05:21 PM
  #5  
HOTLAP's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: December 18, 2004
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
Wow - I'd seen posts here that removal (w/o a tune) actually hurt hp and one person claimed to have dynod & lost 3 hp......
Old 3/2/05 | 05:26 PM
  #6  
Fordracing200's Avatar
Thread Starter
GTR Member
 
Joined: October 30, 2004
Posts: 4,999
Likes: 0
nope, stock car minus the cabron trap dyno'd plus 2rwhp.
Old 3/2/05 | 06:30 PM
  #7  
SixtySix's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,153
Likes: 0
Um...YES, you trying to tell the guy he imagined his "Real World" experience? We've seen everything from negative numbers to +8.

I don't like to get caught up in numbers, real world experience tells me different. I removed my H-Trap with a K&N filter change. I lost 2 mpg, and the car didn't run right. Put the trap back in and I gained 4mpg, and the cars acceleration was back to normal if not improved.

That might not be everyone's experience. Don't forget there are a lot of variables here. Add up the +'s and the -'s and you end up with a result that's statistically insignificant.

Face it, the car needs a tune after you make significant changes to airflow. Maybe with a paper filter it's not enough, but it sure was with my K&N replacement.
Old 3/2/05 | 06:34 PM
  #8  
ZRX4ME's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: July 19, 2004
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Originally posted by SixtySix@March 2, 2005, 6:33 PM
Um...YES, you trying to tell the guy he imagined his "Real World" experience? We've seen everything from negative numbers to +8.

I don't like to get caught up in numbers, real world experience tells me different. I removed my H-Trap with a K&N filter change. I lost 2 mpg, and the car didn't run right. Put the trap back in and I gained 4mpg, and the cars acceleration was back to normal if not improved.

That might not be everyone's experience. Don't forget there are a lot of variables here. Add up the +'s and the -'s and you end up with a result that's statistically insignificant.

Face it, the car needs a tune after you make significant changes to airflow. Maybe with a paper filter it's not enough, but it sure was with my K&N replacement.


OK,here's one for ya.Took my trap out from the first week I got it(5000 mi now) and my car runs a bit better than my wife's.Revs quicker and pulls better at high RPM.Go figure.
Old 3/2/05 | 07:25 PM
  #9  
SixtySix's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,153
Likes: 0
Maybe with a paper filter it's not enough, but it sure was with my K&N replacement.
I think I may be on to something with that last statement. One without the other may be the key. The H-trap by itself isn't enough to trip over the line, but combined with a freer flowing filter, it is
Old 3/2/05 | 08:31 PM
  #10  
My Blue Heaven's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 31, 2004
Posts: 389
Likes: 0
How many runs did you make with it out?

Chris
Old 3/2/05 | 08:38 PM
  #11  
Blk05GT's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: December 28, 2004
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
I gained 2 HP on a warm run after removing the trap and 6 HP after we let the car cool down.
Old 3/2/05 | 08:43 PM
  #12  
S197 GT's Avatar
3rd Times A Charm
 
Joined: February 17, 2005
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Can you explain exactly where it is and how to take it out.
Old 3/2/05 | 08:56 PM
  #13  
Blk05GT's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: December 28, 2004
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Originally posted by 05GT-BABY@March 2, 2005, 9:46 PM
Can you explain exactly where it is and how to take it out.
It's behind the air filter. Take a pair of needle-nose pliers and slowly work the the thing out. Very easy. The 05s have been running rich from the factory so just removing the trap shouldn't cause any problems. However removing the trap along with changing the filter might lean it out enough to be an issue as SixtySix pointed out.

Old 3/2/05 | 09:10 PM
  #14  
2005MustangGT's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: January 8, 2005
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
Has anyone else heard the term, "leaner is meaner?"
Just figured that if you took the H/C trap out and installed a K&N filter you wouldn't be adding enough air to make the car significally lean.
Yes, you are improving air flow, but you aren't increasing boost.
If the stock settings on the 05's is rich, then it seems like you would either be neutralizing the setting or running slightly on the rich side(which I doubt) making more power.
After all, the more AIR you mix w/ the fuel, the more power you are making...yes you do have to add fuel w/ air, but we aren't talking about adding power adders (N20, Turbo, Superchargers).
Old 3/2/05 | 09:24 PM
  #15  
38special's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: March 6, 2004
Posts: 1,517
Likes: 0
2005MustangGT Posted Today, 11:13 PM
Has anyone else heard the term, "leaner is meaner?"...
...After all, the more AIR you mix w/ the fuel, the more power you are making...yes you do have to add fuel w/ air, but we aren't talking about adding power adders (N20, Turbo, Superchargers).
I believe the computer adjusts the fuel up and down at the wrong times just to confound us.
Old 3/2/05 | 09:29 PM
  #16  
wild stray's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: September 18, 2004
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
[quote=SixtySix,March 2, 2005, 5:28 PM]
Maybe with a paper filter it's not enough, but it sure was with my K&N replacement.
I think I may be on to something with that last statement. One without the other may be the key. The H-trap by itself isn't enough to trip over the line, but combined with a freer flowing filter, it is



This is my opinion also.
Old 3/2/05 | 09:33 PM
  #17  
S197 GT's Avatar
3rd Times A Charm
 
Joined: February 17, 2005
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Blk05GT+March 2, 2005, 7:59 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Blk05GT @ March 2, 2005, 7:59 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'><!--QuoteBegin-05GT-BABY@March 2, 2005, 9:46 PM
Can you explain exactly where it is and how to take it out.
It's behind the air filter. Take a pair of needle-nose pliers and slowly work the the thing out. Very easy. The 05s have been running rich from the factory so just removing the trap shouldn't cause any problems. However removing the trap along with changing the filter might lean it out enough to be an issue as SixtySix pointed out.


[/b][/quote]

:worship: Hey thanks alot Tim. :worship:
Old 3/3/05 | 02:21 PM
  #18  
Fordracing200's Avatar
Thread Starter
GTR Member
 
Joined: October 30, 2004
Posts: 4,999
Likes: 0
if you take off the air filter all together, it loses rwhp. and sixty six, i meant that it doesnt lose power.
Old 3/3/05 | 02:35 PM
  #19  
jwede's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2005
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
The Mass Airflow sensor will read the extra air and adjust the mixture accordingly. If you have a vacuum leak after the MAF sensor, you will run lean.

I don't see where less restriction will cause a lean situation.
Old 3/3/05 | 04:28 PM
  #20  
yikesaz's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: December 6, 2004
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
COPY THAT.
It's like the difference between Sea Level & 6000Ft above. The computer should adjust for a little more air......unless it doesn't like you.


Quick Reply: Carbon Trap Removal



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:12 PM.