GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

CAI and tune CHALLENGE! Show me via dyno what is better than a Steeda CAI and Bama ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 5, 2007 | 04:58 PM
  #21  
Bullitt995's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 17, 2006
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by The Reverend
I believe the Steeda CAI and Bamachips 93 race tune produces the most HP of any CAI/Tune combo, prove me wrong.
Post your CAI plus tune dynos here.
C&L, JLT, and other please apply!
Wow neato, here you go...

Reply
Old Nov 5, 2007 | 11:20 PM
  #22  
302svt's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 26, 2006
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by KenB
Just in case you guys didn't know, that was us who did the testing for 5.0. We went by MD Motorsports back then.

Ken
I definitely need to make a trip up there.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 09:31 AM
  #23  
RKNMACH's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 10, 2006
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: NOVA
Originally Posted by howarmat
+1....maybe 320 but probably more like 315
More like 300-305 tops with just a tune, CAI and exhaust
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 12:36 PM
  #24  
howarmat's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 11, 2006
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by RKNMACH
More like 300-305 tops with just a tune, CAI and exhaust
ehh....LTs and the TB should get him a up to 315......i assume he has UDP also though
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 12:39 PM
  #25  
scramblr's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: August 14, 2005
Posts: 1,217
Likes: 0
From: Spangdahlem Air Base Germany
And unfortunatley, none of these numbers mean squat outside the track. Put the numbers to the pavement and then see what's what. But then again, now we need the same weather, track, driver...endless.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 01:01 PM
  #26  
DarkFireGT's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 26, 2006
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
From: East Moline, IL
Originally Posted by scramblr
And unfortunatley, none of these numbers mean squat outside the track. Put the numbers to the pavement and then see what's what. But then again, now we need the same weather, track, driver...endless.
Dyno number mean more than track numbers. But dyno numbers don't mean anything without the before numbers. If you have both before and after on the same, reliable dyno, then that definitely means more than numbers from the track. Way too many variables at the track.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 01:33 PM
  #27  
howarmat's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 11, 2006
Posts: 231
Likes: 0
Honestly neither number means much is certain situations.....track has many factors that come into play, mostly the human factor. You can have a car with low 12 potential but you can only get it to run low 13s. The same car driven by a different person runs low 12s right after you run it.....this is where track times are misleading and when someone like Brenspeed breaks into the 12s with only CAI and tune and maybe tires, they have the "good driver" mod and not everyone with CAI and tune and tires should shoot for 12s or be disappointed they didnt get as good of time.

The dyno numbers are good to compare HP gained by an upgrade....if you take a car run it on the dyno, install UDPs and CMCV then dyno it all back to back, you see how much HP those mods adds. Using this type of data allows you to project what a similar setup should get you on a different car. Comparing Car A dyno to Car B dyno takes out the human factor that is added when comparing track times but unless done back to back will lose a good deal of its certainty when you are talking about 5-10 HP differences
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 01:35 PM
  #28  
RKNMACH's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 10, 2006
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: NOVA
Originally Posted by howarmat
ehh....LTs and the TB should get him a up to 315......i assume he has UDP also though

Don't see UDP's plus 4.10's take a little HP away.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 05:06 PM
  #29  
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
 
Joined: May 11, 2006
Posts: 10,648
Likes: 2,519
From: Carnegie, PA
It's just as Darkfire mentioned ! dyno numbers don't mean squat, without the stock numbers first.

Otherwise how can you really be sure, what your car gained from stock to modified..
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 06:02 PM
  #30  
DarkFireGT's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 26, 2006
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
From: East Moline, IL
Yup. If you see my mods for my '07, when I say I threw down 284HP, it doesn't sound all that great. But when you realize I put down 241 stock, it sounds pretty decent. You need a reference point, and since dynos differ, it has to be from the same one.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 07:03 PM
  #31  
tom281's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: October 8, 2005
Posts: 12,395
Likes: 29
From: Medina county, OH
Take it to the track, and rule out ET but instead, focus on the MPH. Driver skill, tires, traction, etc. all will affect ET but MPH is hard to screw up.

Dyno's vary too much..... unless like some of you have said, you dyno before and after and have that reference point, there's just too many variables. The track is the same way with ET; however if you know the weight of the car, the MPH at the track is a good indicator of what kind of real power you have.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 07:54 PM
  #32  
karman's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: January 4, 2006
Posts: 3,904
Likes: 32
This is what a little K&N can do (STD correction).
Attachment 35215
I know the numbers are lower than the Steeda, but considering the size difference I am not all that impressed.
Attached Thumbnails CAI and tune CHALLENGE!  Show me via dyno what is better than a Steeda CAI and Bama ?-std-graph.jpg  
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 11:05 PM
  #33  
DynamicmustangGT's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2007
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
all i know is the headers claim around 30-40 with the o/r x , the steeda cai+ elbow add around 25, and figuring around 285 stock, I figured that was about right, like I said i dont really care about dynos
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 11:06 PM
  #34  
DynamicmustangGT's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2007
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
i do have udp and cmdp's installed also
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 11:08 PM
  #35  
DynamicmustangGT's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: January 12, 2007
Posts: 1,875
Likes: 0
i need to update all that stuff, i have cams and new heads ready to go on before the supercharger this winter, hoping for around 600rwhp
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2007 | 11:20 PM
  #36  
DarkFireGT's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 26, 2006
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
From: East Moline, IL
You can't stack mods. Alone each item may add that much. But when you put them together, they give a little here and there, so once you already have a list of bolt-ons and you add on headers, you may not achieve the advertised gains.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 12:18 AM
  #37  
05BlackGT's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: September 15, 2004
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
Bamachips Email vs Dyno tunes

Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 12:30 AM
  #38  
tifo's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: December 14, 2006
Posts: 151
Likes: 0
From: San Gabriel Valley, CA
Here are the numbers my car produced before being modded (stock) and after the mods were installed. These dyno numbers are what my car produced during the process of being custom-tuned at Swanson Performance. I have the Ford Racing 90mm CAI, which is the same as your Steeda CAI, but I also have the high-flow inlet elbow and other mods listed in my signature.

As mentioned by other board members, STD smoothing produces higher numbers than SAE. My dyno numbers reflect SAE smoothing on 5. My best dyno run showed 300RWHP 308TOR, but that's because the shop had the SAE smoothing on SAE 3. When the SAE smoothing was adjusted to 5, you see that I made 294RWHP 307Tor.

In comparison to your dyno numbers you made with STD smoothing on 5, the numbers my car produced with SAE smoothing on 5 may be slightly better than yours.

Either way, I think comparing my "stock" dyno numbers to "modded" dyno numbers is an accurate way of seeing how much HP you can pick up from the mods. The other factor to consider is that the "stock" dyno numbers were done when my car only had 700 miles on it and I'm sure the engine loosened up a bit by the time my car was modded three months later. It feels like my car has loosened up even more since it was custom-tuned 8 months ago as I am now approaching 9000 miles on the OD....

Sorry about the two different formats of my dyno runs.

my two cents,
~Ray
Attached Thumbnails CAI and tune CHALLENGE!  Show me via dyno what is better than a Steeda CAI and Bama ?-stock.jpg  
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
after mods.pdf (65.0 KB, 210 views)
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 07:23 AM
  #39  
302svt's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 26, 2006
Posts: 1,030
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 05BlackGT
Looks like bamachips was almost right on.
Reply
Old Nov 7, 2007 | 09:15 AM
  #40  
RKNMACH's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 10, 2006
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
From: NOVA
Originally Posted by DarkFireGT
You can't stack mods. Alone each item may add that much. But when you put them together, they give a little here and there, so once you already have a list of bolt-ons and you add on headers, you may not achieve the advertised gains.

exactly right.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:35 PM.