GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Agent 47 working on CAI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 11:36 AM
  #1  
JonW's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 23, 2005
Posts: 733
Likes: 1
Agent 47 working on CAI

I sent an email to Corey at Agent 47, asking him if he had any plans to build a CAI kit using the air intakes from his brake cooling package. He said he had something in the works, and to check back with him in about a month or so. This is very cool!

My '68 442 W30 had scoops under the bumper and hoses leading to the air cleaner, from the factory. Very cool looking setup.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 05:28 PM
  #2  
70MACH1OWNER's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 9, 2005
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 6
From: New Carlisle, Ohio (20 miles north of Dayton)
Originally Posted by JonW
I sent an email to Corey at Agent 47, asking him if he had any plans to build a CAI kit using the air intakes from his brake cooling package. He said he had something in the works, and to check back with him in about a month or so. This is very cool!

My '68 442 W30 had scoops under the bumper and hoses leading to the air cleaner, from the factory. Very cool looking setup.

Hey Jon,
This is way off topic... but who faster... the Stang or the Dodge??? Inquiring minds want to know. BTW...Agent 47 stuff if top shelf!
Scott
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 06:36 PM
  #3  
JonW's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 23, 2005
Posts: 733
Likes: 1
I'd have to say the Dodge is faster, but not by much. The extra 50 horsepower is offset by extra weight. And 2.82 gears.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 07:40 PM
  #4  
Rapture's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 27, 2006
Posts: 875
Likes: 2
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by JonW
I'd have to say the Dodge is faster, but not by much. The extra 50 horsepower is offset by extra weight. And 2.82 gears.

I am really suprised, most people I know that Have R/Ts are turning 14s stock
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 08:15 PM
  #5  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by 70MACH1OWNER
BTW...Agent 47 stuff if top shelf!
And ridiculously overpriced.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 08:21 PM
  #6  
DarkFireGT's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 26, 2006
Posts: 2,019
Likes: 5
From: East Moline, IL
The Charger must have a more spirited tune, then, because my Magnum R/T could not keep up with our '05 when it was stock. It was close, but definitely not faster. The cars are pigs, and the gears are very steep. I don't know why DC didn't give customers a choice on that, and there's no aftermarket support. I loved my Magnum, but it was definitely no Mustang. I have not seen a stock LX (barring SRT's) break into 13's, let alone low 13's, which is what the Mustangs run. In fact, I believe Car and Driver got 13.5 out of the SRT-8, if I remember correctly.

In any event, I'll be interested to see this intake.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 08:31 PM
  #7  
JonW's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 23, 2005
Posts: 733
Likes: 1
One of the mags, I think it was either Hot Rod or Car Craft, tested a Mustang and a Charger as part of a "Bullitt reunion". IIRC, it was pretty much a dead heat in the quarter. To me, the Charger feels a little quicker SOTP, but I've not run either the Charger or the Mustang thru the traps.

You're right in that the Mustang does handle much better in tight quarters, and is much easier to mod. The Charger excels on the highway. It's a great touring car.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 08:44 PM
  #8  
Rapture's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 27, 2006
Posts: 875
Likes: 2
From: Maryland
Guys Remember we are talking about Charger RTs. If you want to compare SRT8s (425+) compare them to the GT500 LOL 300s and Magnums included! I think a mildly modded GT could take them!

BTW RTs cost more than GT Mustangs
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 08:48 PM
  #9  
burningman's Avatar
Bow Chica Bow Wow
TMS Staff
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 7,446
Likes: 12
From: Proudly in NJ...bite it FL
Originally Posted by JonW
My '68 442 W30 had scoops under the bumper and hoses leading to the air cleaner, from the factory. Very cool looking setup.
So did my 82 Mustang GT
and yes a very cool setup
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 09:24 PM
  #10  
pebkac's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: July 31, 2004
Posts: 256
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Rapture
Guys Remember we are talking about Charger RTs. If you want to compare SRT8s (425+) compare them to the GT500 LOL 300s and Magnums included! I think a mildly modded GT could take them!

BTW RTs cost more than GT Mustangs
I know a stock GT can take a 300 for sure. I missed 3rd from a dig but had a fender on him and his slush box. Missing 3rd didn't really matter though as 60 in a 55 was enough that day.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2007 | 09:28 PM
  #11  
don_w's Avatar
 
Joined: June 21, 2005
Posts: 4,276
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Rapture
If you want to compare SRT8s (425+) compare them to the GT500
OK... they are both fat pigs at over 4,000 lbs.
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2007 | 07:00 AM
  #12  
blkstang06's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: October 9, 2006
Posts: 2,757
Likes: 1
From: It's tough in the jungle !
Originally Posted by JonW
One of the mags, I think it was either Hot Rod or Car Craft, tested a Mustang and a Charger as part of a "Bullitt reunion". IIRC, it was pretty much a dead heat in the quarter. To me, the Charger feels a little quicker SOTP, but I've not run either the Charger or the Mustang thru the traps.

You're right in that the Mustang does handle much better in tight quarters, and is much easier to mod. The Charger excels on the highway. It's a great touring car.
I read that article! Ford even painted the Stang green for the photo shoot! Actually the Stang edged out the Charger Hemi !.. Yep! coup verses four door boat...
Reply
Old Jul 17, 2007 | 10:35 PM
  #13  
2K05GT's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 5, 2006
Posts: 191
Likes: 2
From: Virginia
I don't know what you are saying that the chargers are fast, I raced a couple of them, one stock Daytona and a Modded Daytona.

Modded 2006 Dodge Daytona R/T
http://youtube.com/watch?v=bqf7X9nmTYo

Stock Daytona
http://youtube.com/watch?v=8XMCt81hlho
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 07:47 AM
  #14  
JonW's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 23, 2005
Posts: 733
Likes: 1
There's a technique you have to use to launch a Charger. You can't just stomp it when the light turns green. The vehicle stability assist system doesn't like that.

Can we get back on subject now?
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 06:02 PM
  #15  
70MACH1OWNER's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 9, 2005
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 6
From: New Carlisle, Ohio (20 miles north of Dayton)
Originally Posted by JonW
There's a technique you have to use to launch a Charger. You can't just stomp it when the light turns green. The vehicle stability assist system doesn't like that.

Can we get back on subject now?
Sorry Jon... I asked question that started your thread in a totally different direction. I am sorry. Agent 47 stuff is good stuff. Post a pic when it is released. WE would like to see it.
Scott
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2007 | 11:42 PM
  #16  
Lokius's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 29, 2005
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Back to topic. I am interested in seeing what Agent 47 comes out with, they do rapid prototyping work, so we should see something soon.

I always wanted them to do a CAI as well as some more spoiler/splitters for the front, rear and sides.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 02:18 AM
  #17  
rrobello's Avatar
TMS West Coast Correspondent
 
Joined: October 14, 2004
Posts: 3,581
Likes: 0
Ill ask about it when I am over there in the next couple of days.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DarrenGT
2010-2014 Mustang
33
Apr 2, 2020 11:52 AM
DrisStang
Repair and Service Help
3
Sep 14, 2015 06:20 PM
Grabber5.00
5.0L GT Modifications
4
Sep 13, 2015 06:53 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:17 AM.