GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

Achieving 340-400 bhp naturally aspirated

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 30, 2011 | 09:20 PM
  #41  
harristotle's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 8, 2008
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
From: California
Originally Posted by bob
Probably a longevity issue using the 4.6 deck height, anytime you add stroke and limit the R/S ratio, side loading on the piston goes up which effects longevity and mechanical effciency due to increased friction. Its not really an issue in the aftermarket but for an OE trying to keep the EPA off its back (more emissions than mileage), you've got to take every advanate you can get.

My question has always been; Why didn't Ford do an aluminum 3v 5.4 with an M6/A6 trans from the get-go?

That would have been 350hp/375tq if trimmed out like the 05-09 4.6 3v GT motor and about 370hp/380tq in 2010 trim, plus Ford could have had an all aluminum 5.4 4v in 2007 with the GT500.
Forgive my ignorance, but what does the R/S ratio reference?

And amen to a 3v aluminum 5.4 in the GT!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PonyMuscletang13
2010-2014 Mustang
14
Sep 24, 2015 01:40 PM
Evil_Capri
Mustang Motorsports
1
Sep 11, 2015 08:39 AM
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
Sep 8, 2015 10:45 AM
Omegaprime92
1994-2004 V-8
2
Sep 8, 2015 08:53 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:52 PM.