GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

5.3 N/A mill for my Bullitt.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 02:11 PM
  #1  
eighty6gt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: December 17, 2004
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
5.3 N/A mill for my Bullitt.

Ever since I learned the FRPP Iron big bore 5.0 block is only 60 lb heavier than the aluminum factory block, the gears in my head have been turning.

My Bullitt is my daily companion, my year round daily driver, from -40 to 100 above, rain, snow, mud! It's been a fantastic car for the 2+ years I've been driving it - hard!

I've done the dreaming and dismissed so many FI options. Never could pull the trigger.

I like playing lego, so I'd get the block finished either by the vendor or locally, if someone has torque plates, honed to fit whatever pistons I choose. Get a stroker crank and rods - shoot for 11:1 CR. I'd need a new flywheel so I'd throw in a fresh clutch.

I'd probably even leave some power on the table (unheard of!) and use the Ford Racing Parts Direct top end kit. FRPP ported heads, the Hot Rod cams, and the new intake and TB. Use my factory CAI. I think the FRPP intake clears my strut brace. (?)

Using JBA LT headers, I'd fab up my own 2-1/2" H pipe (probably butcher the JBA Piece, add some cats) with a factory style crossover (mostly blocked! Reuse the stock cat back.

$10,000.00 with a dyno tune! Should have more torque than the new 5.0. Don't know about hp...
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 05:42 PM
  #2  
70MACH1OWNER's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 9, 2005
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 6
From: New Carlisle, Ohio (20 miles north of Dayton)
Don't take this wrong...but if I had 10K to spend I would do this http://site.brenspeed.com/b302/B302.pdf And put this on top on it. http://www.brenspeed.com/saleenstage1.html A whole lot more power and very reliable. But that is me I guess.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2010 | 07:07 PM
  #3  
eighty6gt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: December 17, 2004
Posts: 356
Likes: 0
Tell me about it. It's not that I have $10k to spend, it's that I like the car, and don't like blowers that much. Heh.

There's a reason something like this is unique!
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2010 | 06:02 PM
  #4  
70MACH1OWNER's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 9, 2005
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 6
From: New Carlisle, Ohio (20 miles north of Dayton)
Hey no problem. I am a N/A guy myself. Check out this option...save the 60 lbs on the nose and stay with the aluminum block. You can't do any better than these guys.

http://www.livernoismotorsports.com/...t.phtml?p=1885
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2010 | 10:36 PM
  #5  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
And I contend that Ford missed the boat from 2005 to 2010 by not putting the 5.4 (all aluminum course) in 3v trim from the get go. It would have easily produced 50-70 more HP and and an equal amount of torque with little in the way of a weight penalty. Mods aside, that would have been kicking sand in the face of LS1/2 powered cars from the get go.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 03:06 PM
  #6  
Bullitt995's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 17, 2006
Posts: 939
Likes: 0
Has anybody actually built a 5.3 big bore out of a 3v block? Not sure I've seen that done yet. I know of a 5.3 that came from a teksid but that's it.
Reply
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 04:43 PM
  #7  
70MACH1OWNER's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 9, 2005
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 6
From: New Carlisle, Ohio (20 miles north of Dayton)
Cali HP Addict is running a 326 CI stroker in a 3V block. He has been doing it for 3-4 years. Largest displacement I know of. Not sure who's rotating assembly he is using.
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 07:54 AM
  #8  
CO_VaporGT_09's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 5, 2008
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
From: Arvada, CO
I'd love to do this as a racing mill in a few years, probably stick to the Ford 5.0 for durability. I'd imagine this is a big job for a shop to do, what do you figure on price for the install work (don't think I'd ever take it on myself).
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 02:22 AM
  #9  
Ghost's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: March 30, 2010
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Littleton, CO
You might also take a look at this:
http://www.dssracing.com/ProductDeta...e=PM53ALUMLB3V
I keep coming back to this; 10,500 in standard configuration with some pretty decent included features (compression from 8.5-11.5:1, all aluminum 5.3 long block). 12,500 for the "Super-Mod" option; ported heads, cams, ARP studs, etc......doesn't seem like a horrible way to go for a stroker.

Last edited by Ghost; Oct 21, 2010 at 02:24 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 03:11 PM
  #10  
redruder's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: October 29, 2008
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu, HI
Originally Posted by Ghost
You might also take a look at this:
http://www.dssracing.com/ProductDeta...e=PM53ALUMLB3V
I keep coming back to this; 10,500 in standard configuration with some pretty decent included features (compression from 8.5-11.5:1, all aluminum 5.3 long block). 12,500 for the "Super-Mod" option; ported heads, cams, ARP studs, etc......doesn't seem like a horrible way to go for a stroker.
For NA set up that would have plenty of bite to with the bark.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jim74656
SN95 Mustang
8
May 1, 2023 02:15 AM
JTB
Motorsports
0
Sep 7, 2015 10:20 PM
celticstanger
Off-Topic Chatter
14
Jun 18, 2005 09:02 PM
Dan
General Vehicle Discussion/News
15
Jan 30, 2005 07:30 PM
TomServo92
05-09 Exterior Modifications
11
Dec 25, 2004 09:15 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:44 PM.