GT Performance Mods 2005+ Mustang GT Performance and Technical Information

4.6 4V or 5.4 3V

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12/21/09, 06:23 PM
  #1  
V6 Member
Thread Starter
 
ranebowcyxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 11, 2006
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
4.6 4V or 5.4 3V

I currently have a nice 5.4 3V ready to go to the builder. A 4.6 4V just came across my path. Till it is all said and done both motors will cost about the same when I'm done. The main advantage the 4.6 is already done and buttoned up, complete from TB to the pan. It has 98 Cobra cams and some serious head work including larger valves.

I know the extra 50 cubes is worth a lot, but so is the 4v over 3v. All things being equal dollar wise, which motor should I go with?

My goal is to beat my 4.0 V6 current best of 12.03 @ 117, I'd like to get thier N/A if possible, my power adder of choice for now is Nitrous. I have had a Pro Charger, a turbo and currently a 100 shot. I like the juice for the simplicity especially when tuning so that's how the build (either motor) will play out.

Thoughts?
Old 12/21/09, 06:57 PM
  #2  
I don't do trannies
or rear-ends anymore!
 
EagleStroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Location: Memphis
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Both have readily available parts, put what's easier to get in the car. Either way you have to buy a new ECU, either way you have a lot of work. The 4v probably weighs less doesn't it? Are you swapping the guts of either or just running as is? If it's the latter I would chose the 4v personally.
Old 12/21/09, 07:18 PM
  #3  
V6 Member
Thread Starter
 
ranebowcyxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 11, 2006
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 4v has has everything but the ECU, I'm not sure which one to use. The 5.4 can use an 06 ECU, my car is an 06. The 4v also has the wiring harness, other than the computer it is ready to run.
Old 12/22/09, 09:02 AM
  #4  
Cobra Member
 
classix_stang289's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 10, 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,064
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
im curious to see how this topic develops, cause i have plans to either do a terminator build, or get an aluminator shortblock and keep the stock heads and throw on my supercharger of choice. I have other options but i wont get into it right now as these plans are being saved for spring time so things may or may not change.

what are these stock 3v heads rated to? when do they develop a HP restriction?
im trying to do a nice build without changing the heads if i dont have to, but if i do then straight to livernois i will go.
Old 12/22/09, 05:13 PM
  #5  
Legacy TMS Member
 
tom281's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 8, 2005
Location: Medina county, OH
Posts: 12,397
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
What 4v? The Mach 1 aluminum block or the Terminator iron block? We know the 5.4 is iron. Either way, I would lean towards the 4.6 since it has cams and head work unless the 5.4 has something comparable.
Old 12/22/09, 05:35 PM
  #6  
Legacy TMS Member
 
70MACH1OWNER's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 9, 2005
Location: New Carlisle, Ohio (20 miles north of Dayton)
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
[quote=classix_stang289;5783436]im curious to see how this topic develops, cause i have plans to either do a terminator build, or get an aluminator shortblock and keep the stock heads and throw on my supercharger of choice. I have other options but i wont get into it right now as these plans are being saved for spring time so things may or may not change.

what are these stock 3v heads rated to? when do they develop a HP restriction?
im trying to do a nice build without changing the heads if i dont have to, but if i do then straight to livernois i will go.[/quot




Uh well...if you do a search you will find that twin turbo'd 3V motors can push upwards of 1000 rwhp in extreme builds. Remember the Chevykillers engine build???? Had it survived it would have been an outstanding example of what they a capable of.
Old 12/22/09, 06:18 PM
  #7  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
then there's always the "there's no replacement for displacement" argument...
Old 12/22/09, 06:59 PM
  #8  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
conv_stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 3, 2004
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Im a fan of the 4V.... but I am biased. You can make some killer power and with the right parts really rev the snot out of them
Old 12/22/09, 08:09 PM
  #9  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by conv_stang
Im a fan of the 4V....
I always have been too going back to 70's Lotus days...

However, Ford's 'new' 3V has only 50% of the cam drag of the 4V, but has less than 25% of the airflow reduction compared to the 4V (I say less than 25% because the 3V's singular ex valve is much bigger than one of the two ex valves in each cyl of the 4V).

In theory, the 3V should be able to put out more HP/Torque per cylinder...

I think the only reason to go back to the 4 Cam/4V, is with Ford's new iVCT where you can really tweak the in & ex cam timing/overlap at different rpm ranges. That's pretty cool!

Last edited by cdynaco; 12/22/09 at 08:11 PM.
Old 12/22/09, 11:09 PM
  #10  
Bullitt Member
 
NastyStang113's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 24, 2009
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
How about a 5.4L 4V?
Old 12/22/09, 11:29 PM
  #11  
I don't do trannies
or rear-ends anymore!
 
EagleStroker's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Location: Memphis
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by NastyStang113
How about a 5.4L 4V?
I was just going to say sell both for a 5.4 4v and a whipple
Old 12/28/09, 05:45 AM
  #12  
GT Member
 
firestang70's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 11, 2005
Posts: 166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
rb6 if the 4v is forged already, go that route. Throw a big shot of nitrous on it and let it eat.
Old 12/31/09, 06:43 PM
  #13  
Bullitt Member
 
bigray327's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 12, 2007
Location: League City, TX
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This is all about what you want to do with the car. If your goals are just to get into the 11s like you stated, you can do that (and much more) with the 4.6L, which is going to be 70ish pounds lighter than the iron 5.4L block. Seventy pounds is nothing to sneeze at.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
redrock35
05-09 Exterior Modifications
9
7/31/16 08:50 PM
Ray11
2010-2014 Mustang
2
9/25/15 12:43 PM
VinnyD
Introductions
2
9/18/15 01:19 PM
ccc
Repair and Service Help
3
9/14/15 06:56 PM
bconboy
2005-2009 Mustang
6
9/10/15 02:31 PM



Quick Reply: 4.6 4V or 5.4 3V



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:16 AM.